2008/10/16 Xavier Lamien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
musuruan_[AT]_gmail.com | e-uae | Not found in nonfree-devel
musuruan_[AT]_gmail.com | e-uae | Not found in nonfree-F-8
musuruan_[AT]_gmail.com | e-uae | Not found in nonfree-F-9
- Import problems, being worked on afaik
Status?
Xavier?
should
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49
Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rpmfusion-package-
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karel Volný wrote:
hi,
* having libdvdcvs in one of our repos could lead to
projects or cooperation's not to mention or link to us.
That's not limited to Fedora or Red Hat; also some
journalists and howto-writers will
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
NicolasChauvet [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|49 |
--
Configure
Christopher Stone wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karel Volný wrote:
this is a really bad attitude, and I'm sad to hear that from you :-(
basically, you have two options: the gutless way or the brave way
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Stone wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Karel Volný wrote:
this is a really bad attitude, and I'm sad to hear that from you
:-(
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49
NicolasChauvet [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
* having libdvdcvs in one of our repos could lead to
projects or cooperation's not to mention or link to us.
That's not limited to Fedora or Red Hat; also some
journalists and howto-writers will also chose to *not*
mention RPM Fusion and thus not link to us, as it might be
to
Am Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:01:38 +0200
schrieb Karel Volný [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi,
* having libdvdcvs in one of our repos could lead to
projects or cooperation's not to mention or link to us.
That's not limited to Fedora or Red Hat; also some
journalists and howto-writers will also
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56
Xavier Lamien [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4
NicolasChauvet [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|59 |
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49
--- Comment #3 from Stewart Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-16 18:42:20 ---
Okay, the package no longer include the headers or the binaries. Instead, I've
added a requirement for wxsvg and wxsvg-devel where applicable to pull in the
original
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 1
xmms-mp3-1.2.11-2.20071117cvs.fc9
Packages built and released
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68
Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rpmfusion-package-
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67
--- Comment #1 from Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-16 20:00:18
---
Just a note for interested parties: help for reviewing this is highly
appreciated; the kmod stuff is sane apart from the stuff mentioned in the fist
comment
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 18:34 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
For now just continue to obtain it where you got it from until now (e.g.
livna or freshrpms)
, so let's have the people willing to endorse that do it,
+1 -- I suppose those people will start to act once we definitely
decided
Hi all!
I just downloaded the latest F8 and F9 srpm for all freshrpms packages,
extracted them using rpmdev-extract, moved the big source files (*tar,
*zip, *run, *bz2, *gz, ...) away and uploaded everything else to:
http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/freshrpms-sources/
(Full srpms
On Thursday, 16 October 2008 at 16:38, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
Am Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:01:38 +0200
schrieb Karel Volný [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
basically, you have two options: the gutless way or the brave way
the first one is to write about it in a way which cannot be seen
in violation
2008/10/16 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
should be fixed now
Thanks. I'll try later this evening - I have no svn access from where I am.
Import worked :-)
But build failed :-/
There is no libcapsimage-devel for x86_64, ppc and ppc64. But the
first two should be available. Probably
2008/10/16 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all!
I just downloaded the latest F8 and F9 srpm for all freshrpms packages,
extracted them using rpmdev-extract, moved the big source files (*tar, *zip,
*run, *bz2, *gz, ...) away and uploaded everything else to:
2008/10/16 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
@packages: If your package was in dribble or livna as well as in
freshrpms(¹) then for the sake of the RPM Fusion project and the merge
between those three reps: please go and recheck now that the merge of those
packages that were in multiple
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/16 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
should be fixed now
Thanks. I'll try later this evening - I have no svn access from where I am.
Import worked :-)
But build failed :-/
There is no libcapsimage-devel
Hi!
I took a closer look at the list of freshrpms packages that have been in
in freshrpms only up to now (and not in dribble or livna). Find the
list below. If nobody complains it'll likely start this weekend (e.g.
quite soon!) to import all those packages to RPM Fusion's CVS that are
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:33:01 -0400, Thorsten Leemhuis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hardlink++
- Still needed/wanted? Not on http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge
http://www.sodarock.com/hardlink/ (url given in freshrpms hardlink++
package) leads to
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49
Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
25 matches
Mail list logo
