Hi!
I see that there is still no fglrx driver available for F10. What's the
current status?
Thanks!
Regards
--
Richard Körber
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227
--- Comment #14 from NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2008-12-16 10:29:55 ---
Well, It seems that the related mac package is nonfree. so It won't be enabled
in the freeworld version I guess.
--
Configure bugmail:
Current status is ATi still sucks. Nothing new.
I was afraid I would hear that answer. ;-)
On Phoronix somebody claims he has found a way to get the 8.12 driver
working with F10.
http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showpost.php?p=55104postcount=17
Maybe this is helpful?
--
Richard Körber
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-16 12:12:35
---
(In reply to comment #4)
Ah, that's a good idea :).
I tried the above and got this in %doc, though:
error: magic_file(ms,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:59:19 +0100, Karel wrote:
but the breakage isn't reported for Rawhide but for version 10
You're mistaken.
Notice the repository ids as well as the message subject.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227
NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #15
but the breakage isn't reported for Rawhide but for version
10
You're mistaken.
Notice the repository ids as well as the message subject.
argh, this drives me mad
if I do make mockbuild in the devel directory I get qmmp-plugins-
freeworld-0.2.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
within the email, there
OMG, who stole my package?
qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386 requires qmmp =
0:0.2.2
[r...@dhcp-lab-227 mock]# yum list qmmp
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
qmmp.x86_64
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:21:04 +0100, Karel wrote:
OMG, who stole my package?
qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386 requires qmmp =
0:0.2.2
[r...@dhcp-lab-227 mock]# yum list qmmp
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
qmmp.x86_64
qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386 requires qmmp =
0:0.2.2
[r...@dhcp-lab-227 mock]# yum list qmmp
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
qmmp.x86_64
0.2.2-1.fc10
installed
Available Packages
qmmp.i386
0.2.2-1.fc10
fedora
... but looking at
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165
--- Comment #7 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-16 14:51:23
---
(In reply to comment #6)
OK, I have incorporated your suggestions into this set of spec/srpm:
http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cmus.spec
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #16 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-16 14:16:07 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
this would not be required if the package would own that directory ... ;-)
But I can't do that, can I, since on a real system that package
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165
--- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-16 12:41:31 ---
OK, I have incorporated your suggestions into this set of spec/srpm:
http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cmus.spec
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227
Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On 15.12.2008 23:36, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:08:17 +0100, Julian wrote:
Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64:
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0
gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #18 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-16 14:33:08
---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
this would not be required if the package would own that directory ... ;-)
But I can't do that, can I,
On 16.12.2008 08:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
Oh, I get it. I had both x86_64 and i386 versions of freetype from F10.
I guess freetype-freeworld is not an _upgrade_ of freetype, so yum install
freetype-freeworld doesn't automatically grab both versions.
It's not. It's an
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:47:09 +0100, Thorsten wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:08:17 +0100, Julian wrote:
Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64:
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0
gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2008-12-17 02:38:28
---
* There is no compile output. Makefile must be patched to see it. This is a
blocking issue. A reviewer must see the output of what is happening when
building
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165
--- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-17 02:49:54 ---
Using %{name} and %{version} macros is not mandated. I use %{version} macros,
but prefer not to use %{name} especially when %{name} is longer than cmus
(what it
On 16.12.2008 19:47, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 15.12.2008 23:36, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:08:17 +0100, Julian wrote:
Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64:
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires
libfaac.so.0
21 matches
Mail list logo
