http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19
--- Comment #18 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2008-12-22 10:43:47
---
Can't the bug which requires -fno-stack-protector be fixed?! IMHO this is a
blocker, packages should NEVER use -fno-stack-protector, it's an invitation for
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19
--- Comment #19 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2008-12-22 10:45:09
---
Or let's say it differently: WHY is -fno-stack-protector needed? Where's the
evidence that the stack protector isn't catching a legitimate buffer overflow?
--
On Sunday, 21 December 2008 at 20:24, rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org wrote:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 33
Any broken dependencies after this push?
Regards,
R.
--
Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
kqemu
mimms
mythtv
open-vm-tools
smc
vdr-burn
vdrsync
Summary of broken packages (by primary owner):
denis AT poolshark org
open-vm-tools
felix AT fetzig org
vdr-burn
vdrsync
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #24 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-22 14:31:46 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
I still cannot build on F10/x86_64.
* ...it does not build at least under F9/i386.
Is that a different machine ?
Do you think this will be
On Monday, 22 December 2008 at 13:02, Matthias Saou wrote:
Author: thias
:)
I'm glad to see you're still around!
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
Faith manages.
-- Delenn to Lennier in
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #26 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-22 19:14:06
---
(In reply to comment #24)
(can you rpm -qa qt3\* |sort for me ?)
$ rpm -qa qt3\* |sort
qt3-3.3.8b-17.fc10.x86_64
qt3-devel-3.3.8b-17.fc10.x86_64
--
Hi all,
I'm having difficulty connecting to CVS: Permission denied. I last
connected successfully a month or so ago but can't get in now... I have
resubmitted my RSA public key to FAS and re-downloaded all the
certificates but no joy.
Here's an example session:
$ export
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #27 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-22 19:33:38
---
Problem is that both libqt and libqt-mt are not found. On my system I have
libqt-mt but not the former with the BR you require.
$ locate libqt
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #28 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2008-12-22 20:08:03
---
There's no libqt.so in Fedora, it's the obsolete build of Qt with thread
support disabled, nothing should try to link that version. qt-mt is what should
be
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208
Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||269
--
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Chris Nolan ch...@cenolan.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having difficulty connecting to CVS: Permission denied. I last connected
successfully a month or so ago but can't get in now... I have resubmitted my
RSA public key to FAS and re-downloaded all the certificates
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #29 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-22 22:34:01 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
There's no libqt.so in Fedora, it's the obsolete build of Qt with thread
support disabled, nothing should try to link that version. qt-mt
Xavier Lamien wrote:
Could you clean up your know_hosts files and give a new try ?
If it's still falling, send me your ip to track down if you aren't
blocked due to wrong passwd attempt.
Done, still no joy.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19
--- Comment #20 from Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com 2008-12-23 00:47:02 ---
OK, I believe we have all issues addressed.
* Static libs in static package
* Patched to eliminate -fno-stack-protector
Builds, links, passes test suite on x86_64
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19
--- Comment #21 from Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2008-12-23 01:02:47
---
* Package doesn't build with mock. It fails with:
Patch #1 (blcr-stackcheck.patch):
+ /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/blcr-stackcheck.patch
+
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19
--- Comment #23 from Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com 2008-12-23 02:46:02 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
* Package doesn't build with mock. It fails with:
Patch #1 (blcr-stackcheck.patch):
+ /bin/cat
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19
Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |4
http://imdbpy.sourceforge.net/
The MythVideo part of MythTV will soon require this library for
certain functionality. I suspect that because it violates the IMDB
website terms (by being a scraper), it wouldn't get into Fedora proper,
but I'm wondering if it would be allowed here.
I'll have an
On Monday 22 December 2008 07:28:17 pm Chris Petersen wrote:
http://imdbpy.sourceforge.net/
The MythVideo part of MythTV will soon require this library for
certain functionality. I suspect that because it violates the IMDB
website terms (by being a scraper), it wouldn't get into Fedora
20 matches
Mail list logo
