2012/8/19 Richard Shaw :
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> As it's already done in fedora, RPM Fusion needs to be branched.
>>
>> Until it's done, please try not to submit build job in devel. Thoses are
>> likely to be provided as .fc19 in the related tree and n
2012/8/19 Julian Sikorski :
> W dniu 11.06.2012 18:08, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As you may know, the libaacs package from RPM Fusion rely on openssl
>> functions that have been disabled in the fedora package for some
>> reason.
>> This lead the libaacs package to be partially unuseable f
2012/8/20 Sérgio Basto :
> On Sáb, 2012-08-18 at 10:24 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> 2012/8/18 Julian Sikorski :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > where do we stand on ffmpeg-0.11.x rebuild? I it good enough to warrant
>> > pushing to F-17?
>
> Since we are talking about push things from F18 to F17.
> First we
On Sáb, 2012-08-18 at 10:24 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/8/18 Julian Sikorski :
> > Hi,
> >
> > where do we stand on ffmpeg-0.11.x rebuild? I it good enough to warrant
> > pushing to F-17?
Since we are talking about push things from F18 to F17.
First we need push x264 , how about push fi
On 08/18/2012 06:24 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/8/18 Julian Sikorski :
where do we stand on ffmpeg-0.11.x rebuild? I it good enough to warrant
pushing to F-17?
Nope, ABI breaking packages are not expected in stable release. I'm
not even sure every package was rebuilt with the new ffmpeg
W dniu 11.06.2012 18:08, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> Hi,
>
> As you may know, the libaacs package from RPM Fusion rely on openssl
> functions that have been disabled in the fedora package for some
> reason.
> This lead the libaacs package to be partially unuseable for it's target usage.
>
> I would
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi
>
> As it's already done in fedora, RPM Fusion needs to be branched.
>
> Until it's done, please try not to submit build job in devel. Thoses are
> likely to be provided as .fc19 in the related tree and not .fc18 as you may
> expect.
>
>
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34
--- Comment #27 from Nicolas Chauvet 2012-08-19 16:42:52
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > (In reply to comment #24)
> > > (In reply to comment #23)
> > > > There is still no spec update.
> > >
> > > https://dl.d
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2219
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #56 from leigh scott 2012-08-19 15:59:01
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #54)
> (In reply to comment #53)
> > (In reply to comment #52)
> > > You could try
> > >
> > > %build
> > > autoreconf -fi
> > > intltoolize -f
> > > %configure
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |3
--- Comment #19 from Andrea Musuru
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #55 from Mattia M.
2012-08-19 15:51:54 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #54)
> I wouldn't have approved this package if I was the reviewer with this
>
> %build
> ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr
> make %{?_smp_mflags}
>
>
> The autogen li
Thank you.
By the way, Leigh Scott has suggested me some improvements to the spec file
of my package. Please, read starting from
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017#c49
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #54 from leigh scott 2012-08-19 15:47:23
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #53)
> (In reply to comment #52)
> > You could try
> >
> > %build
> > autoreconf -fi
> > intltoolize -f
> > %configure --prefix=%{_prefix}
> > make %{?_smp_mfla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #53 from Mattia M.
2012-08-19 15:39:34 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #52)
> You could try
>
> %build
> autoreconf -fi
> intltoolize -f
> %configure --prefix=%{_prefix}
> make %{?_smp_mflags}
I think there's nothing wrong in our sp
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #52 from leigh scott 2012-08-19 15:35:29
CEST ---
You could try
%build
autoreconf -fi
intltoolize -f
%configure --prefix=%{_prefix}
make %{?_smp_mflags}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #51 from Mattia M.
2012-08-19 15:27:45 CEST ---
Thank you.
(In reply to comment #49)
> How did this package past review with this or was it added later?
>
> %build
> ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr
> make %{?_smp_mflags}
The %build se
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34
--- Comment #26 from Richard 2012-08-19 14:42:02 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> (In reply to comment #24)
> > (In reply to comment #23)
> > > There is still no spec update.
> >
> > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/xmltv.spec
>
> I haven't
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34
--- Comment #25 from Nicolas Chauvet 2012-08-19 14:25:56
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> > There is still no spec update.
>
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/xmltv.spec
I haven't received the related src.rpm s
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34
--- Comment #24 from Richard 2012-08-19 14:02:24 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> There is still no spec update.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/xmltv.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
2012/8/18 Mattia :
> I tried to build gnome-shell-extension-weather (branches: devel, F-16, F-17)
> on Plague, but all builds failed. Here are the logs:
>
> *
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/14212-gnome-shell-extension-weather-0-0.4.gitb9358f2.fc18/
> *
> http
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #50 from leigh scott 2012-08-19 12:33:00
CEST ---
Original Message
Subject: Fwd: gnome-shell-extension-weather
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:32:15 +0100
From: Leigh Scott
To: hal8...@hotmail.it
I mad
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #49 from leigh scott 2012-08-19 12:29:13
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #48)
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:41:06 +0200
From: Mattia
To: rpmfusion-develop
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2400
--- Comment #5 from leigh scott 2012-08-19 11:10:28
CEST ---
The bump from -0.1 to -1 release version is correct as ATI have bumped the beta
driver to final release.
http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/linux/legacy/Pages/legacy-radeon_linux.
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 17: 2
nvidia-settings-1.0-20.fc17
nvidia-xconfig-1.0-18.fc17
Packages b
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 16: 7
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-16-49
ndiswrapper-kmod-1.57-3.fc16.16
openafs-kmod-1.6.1-1.fc16.18
staging-kmod-3.4.2-1.fc16.8
VirtualBox-kmod
26 matches
Mail list logo
