On 08/29/2013 12:14 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Yep but BTW what to do with xine-lib 1.2 ?
I've not tried to rebuild and thus neither to possibly fix xine-lib 1.2
if needed. I'll take a look.
Is it possible to bundle the libav.. .so into the fedora build and add a
xine-lib-extras with
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2549
NVieville nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2550
NVieville nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
On 08/29/2013 11:16 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
On 08/29/2013 12:14 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Yep but BTW what to do with xine-lib 1.2 ?
I've not tried to rebuild and thus neither to possibly fix xine-lib 1.2 if
needed. I'll take a look.
fwiw, xine-lib-1.2.3 builds unpatched against ffmpeg
2013/8/29 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org
On 08/29/2013 04:16 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
What's not clear to me is if the depending packages that will be moved
from Fedora need a re-review or not. See [3].
They will (but doing so should be relatively easy, the packages *should*
be
