https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3034
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3034
--- Comment #26 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com 2014-01-29 09:43:31
CET ---
Sorry, I used the Fedora branch name. Updated request:
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: lpf-skype
New Branches: EL-6
Updated EPEL
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
--- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com 2014-01-29 09:55:52
CET ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
I'm going to close this bug as WONTFIX, but if anyone wants to step up and
maintain gstreamer* packages
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
--- Comment #5 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com 2014-01-29 10:45:37
CET ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Can I proceed in asking permissions on the original Review Requests?
Yes feel free to do so.
I can't find the original reviews
On 1/29/14, RPM Fusion Bugzilla nore...@rpmfusion.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
--- Comment #38 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2014-01-29 08:56:22
CET ---
(In reply to comment #30)
Less legal/policy concerns but will give more work to develop.
Not
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/20: 7
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-20-6
libvdpau-va-gl-0.3.2-1.fc20
ndiswrapper-kmod-1.59-5.fc20.5
openafs-kmod-1.6.6-0.pre1.fc20.9
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Formally, this is about review request 3152 for dropbox-repo [1]. From
a more practical POV, it's about users being able to install software
like dropbox more or less out of the box, an area where I think we
really
On 1/29/14, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
At the start of RPM Fusion we had a sort of steering committee which
handled such decisions (IIRC Hans, Matthias and Thorsten). Each of them
represented one of the
Update from the CMPlayer developer [1]:
I can't be sure till I see the actual result. However, because they
have very nice attitude to accept suggestions, if somethings are lacked
in the result, I think I can make acceptable patch that point once it is
released.
So it doesn't seem like
Guide Lines...
--a
On 1/29/14, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Qua, 2014-01-29 at 11:22 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 1/29/14, RPM Fusion Bugzilla nore...@rpmfusion.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
--- Comment #38 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043
--- Comment #23 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2014-01-29 19:42:53 CET
---
flash-plugin: install completed, no errors
flash-plugin is now updated
thanks
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043
--- Comment #24 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2014-01-29 19:45:44 CET
---
(In reply to comment #23)
flash-plugin: install completed, no errors
flash-plugin is now updated
thanks
sorry. reported in wrong bug report, but cvs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
--- Comment #2 from Matias Kreder mkre...@gmail.com 2014-01-29 20:17:46 CET
---
Thank you. I have contacted the requester of one of the previous BZs to see if
he is still interested in packaging it. If so, I will help him with the review.
--
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
--- Comment #3 from Matias Kreder mkre...@gmail.com 2014-01-29 20:22:27 CET
---
The requester of #2577 replied saying he is no longer interested in packaging
it. #1539 is almost dead.
I think we should go ahead using this BZ.
--
Configure
Would it be possible to start building against RHEL 7 beta?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301
Hello,
I just wanted to know since work on epel has started a while ago for the
EL7 repo do you think you will make a repo for the EL 7 beta in the
meantime or once epel is done ?
Thank you
Claudio
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #11 from Stuart Gathman stu...@gathman.org 2014-01-29 23:14:28
CET ---
I submitted this package quite some time ago. Did I miss something? Was there
a next step I was supposed to take? I don't believe I have priv to build on
the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
---
21 matches
Mail list logo
