Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 20: 15
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-20-7
ffmpeg-2.1.3-1.fc20
libvdpau-va-gl-0.3.2-1.fc20
mpv-0.3.3-1.fc20
ndiswrapper-kmod-1.59-5.fc20.5
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 20: 13
lpf-flash-plugin-11.2.202.335-1.fc20
nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.38-4.fc20.5
nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.38-4.fc20.6
Hi,
On 02/03/2014 02:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
[2nd attempt to answer to this. My initial response from quite a while age
seems to have gone lost.]
On 01/29/2014 12:12 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Formally, this is about review request 3152 for dropbox-repo [1]. From
a more practical POV, it's
On 02/03/2014 10:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/03/2014 02:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
[2nd attempt to answer to this. My initial response from quite a while
age seems to have gone lost.]
On 01/29/2014 12:12 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Formally, this is about review request 3152 for
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:30:42AM +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
One concern is that some of the rpms that third parties provide do ship
their own repo files. So, after the user installs a package, he might
end up with two repo files? We'll have to use proper conflicts in the
specs. What about
n 2/3/14, Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org wrote:
On 02/03/2014 10:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/03/2014 02:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
[2nd attempt to answer to this. My initial response from quite a while
age seems to have gone lost.]
On 01/29/2014 12:12 PM, Alec Leamas
If RPMFusion ships configuration for other repos, the package should
also include the GPG key, set gpgcheck=1 and include only the intended
packages with includepkgs to minimise security problems.
Regards
Till
I have done some examples in the system-config-repo upstream, all
includes the
On 2/3/14, Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org wrote:
[cut]
I'm in agreement with Ralf too.
imho, one of the biggest selling point for repositories like RPM
Fusion is the insurance the Fedora packaging guidelines are enforced and
thus the packages will integrate properly with the remaining of
On 2/3/14, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
[cut]
One concern is that some of the rpms that third parties provide do ship
their own repo files. So, after the user installs a package, he might
end up with two repo files? We'll have to use proper conflicts in the
specs. What about GPG
Hi,
On 02/03/2014 10:03 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
On 03.02.2014 10:52, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/03/2014 02:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: [...]
In other words, I'd recommend not doing so, because you guys are
likely to be facing very tough times in cases something goes
wrong with
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
velo100 peto@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||3161
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161
Bug #: 3161
Summary: Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver
kernel module
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
On 2/3/14, Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 02/03/2014 10:03 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
On 03.02.2014 10:52, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/03/2014 02:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: [...]
In other words, I'd recommend not doing so, because you guys are
likely to be
13 matches
Mail list logo
