Re: Safe to build for rawhide?

On Ter, 2016-08-23 at 19:23 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > I realize some packages > aren't updated in F25 and F26 , like gstreamer1-plugins-ugly 1.8.1 in > f25 [1] and 1.8.2 in f24 [2] OK I check all package published on F25 and rawhide and everything is absolutely correct.

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-23 22:03 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > On 08/23/2016 12:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : >>> Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for >>> preferring anything other than the

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 22:03, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 08/23/2016 12:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > 2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > >> Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for > >> preferring anything other than the

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/23/2016 12:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : >> Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for >> preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does ffmpeg >> have a long-term-support

Re: Safe to build for rawhide?

The package are published thanks !  On Ter, 2016-08-23 at 19:23 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2016-08-23 at 18:20 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > > 2016-08-23 18:16 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw : > > > > > > > > > I remember reading some weeks ago to suspend

Re: Safe to build for rawhide?

On Ter, 2016-08-23 at 18:20 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-08-23 18:16 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw : > > > > I remember reading some weeks ago to suspend building for rawhide. It was just a few hours ... IIRC   > > Is it safe to build for rawhide yet or do I need to

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for > preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does ffmpeg > have a long-term-support branch? There is issue with stable vlc-2.2x which I

ffmpeg for EL7

Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does ffmpeg have a long-term-support branch? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office

[Bug 4009] Review request: qmplay2 - A Qt based media player, streamer and downloader

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4009 --- Comment #18 from MartinKG 2016-08-23 19:46:12 CEST --- new rpm files: Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/qmplay2.spec SRPM URL:

Safe to build for rawhide?

I remember reading some weeks ago to suspend building for rawhide. Is it safe to build for rawhide yet or do I need to continue to wait? Thanks, Richard

Re: rfpkg build fixed, you can build on koji !

2016-08-19 23:11 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > On 08/19/2016 03:08 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 07/13/2016 07:02 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> I've regenerated the repos, you can try any package for now. >>> I'm still away until the end of the week, for other

[Bug 4009] Review request: qmplay2 - A Qt based media player, streamer and downloader

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4009 --- Comment #17 from Vasiliy Glazov 2016-08-23 09:31:55 CEST --- Use cmake can be very simple: mkdir %{_target_platform} %build pushd %{_target_platform} %cmake .. popd %make_build -C %{_target_platform} %install

[Bug 4009] Review request: qmplay2 - A Qt based media player, streamer and downloader

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4009 --- Comment #16 from Vasiliy Glazov 2016-08-23 09:08:45 CEST --- 1. Drop Patch0 at all because not using compile_unix script. 2. Change %setup -q -n %{pname}-src-%{version} to %autosetup -n %{pname}-src-%{version} 3.

[Bug 4009] Review request: qmplay2 - A Qt based media player, streamer and downloader

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4009 rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment