On Dom, 2017-03-19 at 11:16 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> For heading the mass rebuild, I'm using the same script fedora rel-
> eng
> uses adapted for rpmfusion.
> It means the builds are sorted alphabetically and not by
> dependencies.
> So the first pass expects packages having dependencies in
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4256
--- Comment #19 from Xavier Bachelot ---
You won't have to resubmit, the mass rebuild will do it for you.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4256
--- Comment #18 from Michal Ambroz ---
Hi Xavier,
no problem at at all, it is not anything urgent to me. I will try to rebuild in
a week or two.
Mik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
As you might see the mass rebuild has started for f26.
The reason it was late, despite my own time, is that I was waiting to
access aarch64 builders.
The builders are provided by Linaro and are now operating !
Also the ppc64/ppc64le builders are provided by OSUOSL.
A big thanks for both Linaro
On 09/03/2017 17:11, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to update libbluray in rawhide (and f26 as I believe its early
> enough in the release cycle) to version 1.0.0, which includes a soname
> bump. This is a critical path package.
>
> According to repoquery, the following packages will
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4256
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|