[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 Andrew Bauer changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|3 | ---

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 --- Comment #21 from Ben Rosser --- Quick question, does the ticket need to be put from RF_REVIEW into RF_ACCEPT? (I can do this, but I'm not sure if I should as the submitter). -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 4441] Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4441 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #11) ... > We should probably add the requires shown in this spec file, but add them > one per line please: >

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #19) > Awesome, thanks for finishing the review! > > When I asked about BR: coreutils I was told it was "up to the packager's > discretion", so

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 --- Comment #19 from Ben Rosser --- Awesome, thanks for finishing the review! When I asked about BR: coreutils I was told it was "up to the packager's discretion", so yeah, sadly there isn't a firm guideline here. --

[Bug 4441] Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4441 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Bauer --- To expand a bit further on package dependencies, here is content of the deb package control file: >Package: discord >Version: 0.0.1 >Depends: libc6, libasound2,

[Bug 4441] Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4441 Andrew Bauer changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 Andrew Bauer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review?

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 --- Comment #17 from Ben Rosser --- > 2) rpmlint incorrect-fsf-address errors. tilem is definitely quiet upstream. I have filed a bug on their issue tracker about this though: https://sourceforge.net/p/tilem/bugs/11/. My

[Bug 4441] Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4441 --- Comment #9 from Sean Callaway --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #6) > Also have you checked that "re-"distribution is permitted for this software > ? If not explicitely mentionned, can you check with

[Bug 4441] Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4441 --- Comment #8 from Sean Callaway --- I've added `ExclusiveArch: x86_64` to the .spec file. (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #7) > btw, you shoudn't expect Discord to rely on any system ffmpeg. I expect it >

[Bug 4441] Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4441 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet --- btw, you shoudn't expect Discord to rely on any system ffmpeg. I expect it has ffmpeg builtin. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the

[Bug 4441] Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4441 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet --- You need to use ExclusiveArch: x86_64 if you are packaging a closed source binary application. Also have you checked that "re-"distribution is permitted for this software ? If not

Re: rebuilding perl packages against perl 5.26.0

On 2017-07-26 01:50, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 16:26 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: These are all now done (not all by me), with the exception of pangzero  as it requires perl-SDL, which FTBFS in F-27 on ppc64*  (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427880).