Not again!
thanks, for the warning
pulse auto did the same thing before and we patched it to limit logging
rate
but on fedora ML some people said that we should actually fix the logging
system
As far as I know l7-filter provides also an userspace solution for this.
Marek Mahut https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Astronomy/
from http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/HOWTO-userspace
For Linux 2.6.20 and newer, Netfilter has new Layer 3 Independent
Connection tracking
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:01:36 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 18:24, مؤيد السعدي wrote:
Btw, I recently checked adobe's flash agreement. That one definitely
forbids redistribution.
-oget
I don't have any problem with flash
So shall we ask Adobe for a special permission? Note that, although our
chances of an approval are quite slim, asking won't hurt.
And is there anyone who wants to take the lead?
-oget
maybe it's much easier to ask them to fix their .spec file
(then we ask or allow us to fix it)
We already ship java-1.6.0-openjdk and gcj.
no this is not the same we
we in fedora do ship java-1.6.0-openjdk and gcj
we in rpmfusion don't
so we are fine here
for those who suggested that it could be a bug in Sarf or openjdk
I don't care because I don't use any java stuff
but if I can type Arabic letters in GTK+ and QT but not Java then it's
openjdk bug
anyway it's not my choice nor yours
as free system is not a system which you can't run proprietary
there was a long heated thread on fedora ML titled Proposal: Rolling
Release
and some people mentioned something about sun's java and ubuntu was
mentioned
How many years has fedora policy forced a horribly fractured 3rd party
repository situation - and not had a working java at all while
why we don't pack suns' java like them ? is there any legal issue ?
and
We build from source. this includes the jdk.
hello! I'm talking about nonfree branch of rpmfusion
that's why I'm not posting to fedora-devel
rpmfusion contains re-distributable binary only stuff like nvidia
and I hate
it's the mirror manager and it's supposed to be fixed
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121#c5
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:28:18 +0100, Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
As far as I can tell, rpmfusion-free-rawhide's repodata is
broken/corrupt/incomplete or similar.
Hi,
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:09:33 +0100, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
It has been brought to my attention that the Configuration page misses
RHEL/CentOS configuration info, as I'm not familiar with that I won't be
adding
it, but I thought it would be good to pass this remark
nice patch in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135592
but way after all those 4 years the bug is still assigned!!
hello,
BTW: some people suggested lzma which will give us about 60MB
RPM now accepts LZMA payloads as well as sources. Squashfs + LZMA
patches would save some additional space if you want to go that route.
Rahul
I meant Squashfs + LZMA
because I don't want to repack the rpms ..etc.
the
hi,
* have you included nvidia drivers
Not by default. The repository is enabled by default however. So it is
just a yum install away. One of the reasons not to include drivers is
because a live cd installs everything and I am not sure including all
the drivers is appropriate. There is
I have two questions
* have you used generic logos or have you used your own
* have you included nvidia drivers
we have launched Ojuba 1 based on fedora and livna (with our own logos)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DerivedDistributions/LiveCDs#Ojuba_Linux
the overburn version contains
*
14 matches
Mail list logo
