Re: shotcut needs a rebuild for qt6 version 6.6 for F-38

On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 11:15:42 +0100 Dan Horák via rpmfusion-developers wrote: > Hello, > > seems the shotcut-23.11.04-1.fc38 build has been done with qt6 version > 6.5 in the buildroot, but qt6 has been rebased to 6.6 in the meantime. > The F-39 and Rawhide builds of shotcut

shotcut needs a rebuild for qt6 version 6.6 for F-38

Hello, seems the shotcut-23.11.04-1.fc38 build has been done with qt6 version 6.5 in the buildroot, but qt6 has been rebased to 6.6 in the meantime. The F-39 and Rawhide builds of shotcut look good to me. Thanks, Dan ___

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:24:31 +0100 Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2018-01-02 12:53 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler : > > Sérgio Basto wrote: > .. > > The only other solution would be for RPM Fusion to get faster > > 32-bit ARM builders, but it doesn't look like that is

Re: [leftovers] FTBFS in F26

On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 14:21:39 +0200 Alexandre Moine wrote: > Le 17 avril 2017 00:17:32 GMT+02:00, "Sérgio Basto" > a écrit : > >Hello  > > > >These packages are the remain packages that not build in F26 mass- > >rebuild  > > > > > >openmw-0.41.0-2.fc26

Re: avidemux and gcc6

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:32:48 -0500 Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, July 11, 2016, Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > because I wanted avidemux on F-24 I've spend some time to find the > > missing gcc6 fixes, se

avidemux and gcc6

Hi, because I wanted avidemux on F-24 I've spend some time to find the missing gcc6 fixes, see the result in http://fedora.danny.cz/avidemux-2.6.12-gcc6.patch It now builds under F-24 mock. Mostly cherry-picked from

Re: rpms/OCE/devel OCE.spec,1.4,1.5

Nicolas Chauvet píše v Po 18. 02. 2013 v 23:03 +0100: 2013/2/18 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/2/18 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@rpmfusion.org Author: hobbes1069 Update of

Re: buildsystem mame

Nicolas Chauvet píše v So 27. 10. 2012 v 12:40 +0200: Yesterday. Le 27 oct. 2012 10:43, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com a écrit : W dniu 11.10.2012 07:28, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 11.10.2012 00:27, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2012/10/10 Julian Sikorski

Re: buildsystem mame

Dan Horák píše v So 27. 10. 2012 v 12:48 +0200: Nicolas Chauvet píše v So 27. 10. 2012 v 12:40 +0200: Yesterday. Le 27 oct. 2012 10:43, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com a écrit : W dniu 11.10.2012 07:28, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 11.10.2012 00:27, Nicolas Chauvet pisze

Re: rpms/openmotif/devel openmotif.spec,1.4,1.5 sources,1.3,1.4

Nicolas Chauvet píše v Čt 25. 10. 2012 v 21:46 +0200: 2012/10/25 Jochen Schmitt s450...@rpmfusion.org: Author: s4504kr --- openmotif.spec 5 Jun 2012 21:14:46 - 1.4 +++ openmotif.spec 25 Oct 2012 19:15:15 - 1.5 @@ -1,15 +1,13 @@ -%global major 2.3

Re: OpenCascade license?

Richard Shaw píše v Po 19. 12. 2011 v 12:27 -0600: On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: yes, I am, taking for review now Ok, now that you've approved it I need your RPM Fusion account name to add as a co-maintainer :) My account is sharkcz. And thanks

Re: OpenCascade license?

Richard Shaw píše v St 07. 12. 2011 v 15:22 -0600: Dan, Are you still interested in reviewing this package? https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054 Version 0.8.0 is about to be released which includes patches I got upstreamed. (Yay for for packages that build with zero

Re: OpenCascade license?

Richard Shaw píše v Po 14. 11. 2011 v 16:09 -0600: Dan, I'm cleaning up the spec file getting it ready for submission. Are you interested in reviewing and co-maintaining OCE rather than OCC? Sure, I am interested. Do you know if there is a clean relation between OCC releases (and thus API)

Re: OpenCascade license?

Richard Shaw píše v So 05. 11. 2011 v 09:03 -0500: I finally got it to build! that's great news I had to go through the debian *.install files to clean up all the %files sections as there were a lot of libraries removed and a couple added. Let me know if you're still interested. yes, I

Re: OpenCascade license?

Richard Shaw píše v Út 01. 11. 2011 v 08:57 -0500: On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: Richard Shaw píše v Po 31. 10. 2011 v 16:16 -0500: I'm taking a shot a building FreeCAD since I'm a CAD jockey in my day job and a good free CAD solution would be neat

Re: OpenCascade license?

Richard Shaw píše v Čt 03. 11. 2011 v 07:46 -0500: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: Richard Shaw píše v Út 01. 11. 2011 v 08:57 -0500: On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: Richard Shaw píše v Po 31. 10. 2011 v 16:16 -0500: I'm

Re: OpenCascade license?

Richard Shaw píše v Po 31. 10. 2011 v 16:16 -0500: I'm taking a shot a building FreeCAD since I'm a CAD jockey in my day job and a good free CAD solution would be neat. It has OpenCascade as a major dependency, which uses their own license[1]. They claim it's LGPL-like. Would this have to

Re: avidemux: need some programming help

Richard Shaw píše v St 01. 06. 2011 v 11:28 -0500: Ok, so something in the new js (1.8.5) broke avidemux in Fedora 15[1] and I'm in over my head so some direction would be appreciated. The only error info I have from the build log is: I have seen js-1.8.5-related patches in some packages in

Re: x264 ABI bump in rawhide

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski píše v Út 06. 07. 2010 v 21:00 +0200: Hi all Out of these, libquicktime doesn't build because of gtk2 changes in rawhide: libquicktime_config.c: In function 'create_main_window': libquicktime_config.c:115: warning: implicit declaration of function

Re: How to move on with infrastructure?

Thorsten Leemhuis píše v St 21. 10. 2009 v 20:27 +0200: Hi! Some of you might be aware of it, other not, but we afaics have a (whole) lot of medium-sized and small problems in the infrastructure area(¹). The main ones from the top of my head: - our infrastructure team basically consists

Re: Spectrum ROMs in RPM Fusion

Jussi Lehtola píše v So 25. 07. 2009 v 22:02 +0300: On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 17:45 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Hi all, I'm going to submit FBZX, a Spectrum emulator, for review in Fedora. Fedora allows the packaging of Spectrum emulators but it doesn't allow Spectrum ROMs, even

Re: BRing qt3 on both fedora and EPEL

David Timms píše v Pá 03. 04. 2009 v 08:19 +1100: Hi, I got a few hints reqarding this on IRC: I'm trying to adjust my spec to BR qt 3, in a way that works on EPEL and Fedora. mharris suggested this might work: BuildRequires: qt-devel = 3 BuildRequires: qt-devel 4, which -bs ok, actual

Re: Stronger Hashes (was: Re: Outage Notication: Build System)

Thorsten Leemhuis píše v St 11. 03. 2009 v 08:15 +0100: On 10.03.2009 19:31, Julian Sikorski wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: So we got the new rpm and build for i586 now on x86-32. Are any other changes needed? Do we want to do a mass rebuild? How: Manual or scripted? And are there any

Re: Stronger Hashes

Thorsten Leemhuis píše v Čt 12. 03. 2009 v 10:53 +0100: On 12.03.2009 10:15, Dan Horák wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis píše v St 11. 03. 2009 v 08:15 +0100: On 10.03.2009 19:31, Julian Sikorski wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: So we got the new rpm and build for i586 now on x86-32. Are any other

Re: Where we are and where do we what to go?

Thorsten Leemhuis píše v Po 09. 02. 2009 v 19:58 +0100: On 09.02.2009 14:28, Dan Horák wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis píše v Ne 08. 02. 2009 v 10:06 +0100: On 04.02.2009 14:24, Rex Dieter wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 04.02.2009 14:00, Rex Dieter wrote: Andrea Musuruane wrote

Re: Where we are and where do we what to go?

Thorsten Leemhuis píše v Út 10. 02. 2009 v 10:14 +0100: On 10.02.2009 09:57, Dan Horák wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis píše v Po 09. 02. 2009 v 19:58 +0100: On 09.02.2009 14:28, Dan Horák wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis píše v Ne 08. 02. 2009 v 10:06 +0100: On 04.02.2009 14:24, Rex Dieter wrote

CA certificate for bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

Hi, where can be downloaded CA certificate for bugzilla.rpmfusion.org? My Galeon is complaining and wants a manual exception to be added, but that can't be done with one click, so I would prefer the real solution. Dan

Re: kino pulseaudio packaging dependency

Christopher Stone píše v Pá 31. 10. 2008 v 09:31 -0700: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher Stone píše v Pá 31. 10. 2008 v 01:33 -0700: I needed to remove pulseaudio after upgrading to rawhide the other

Re: kino pulseaudio packaging dependency

Christopher Stone píše v Pá 31. 10. 2008 v 01:33 -0700: I needed to remove pulseaudio after upgrading to rawhide the other day, and in doing so I noticed that kino has a requirement on pulseaudio. Should kino Requires be pulseaudio-libs instead? It must be an indirect dependency via esound.

Re: Call for help: mock configs for RPM Fusion

Thorsten Leemhuis píše v Út 02. 09. 2008 v 20:53 +0200: On 02.09.2008 20:38, Dan Horák wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis píše v Út 02. 09. 2008 v 19:48 +0200: More and more people asked for mock configs files that they can use for test-building RPM Fusion packages. I don't have such files, but I

Re: RPM Fusion for EL/EPEL 5

Thorsten Leemhuis píše v Po 11. 08. 2008 v 19:09 +0200: Hi all! More and more people talk to me and ask when will RPM Fusion for EL/EPEL 5 start. As a big junk of the livna import is now done I might over the next few weeks slowly start to do the same work for EPEL. But I need to know

Re: Notification: Dribbles CVSsync done

Julian Sikorski píše v Út 03. 06. 2008 v 13:06 +0200: Xavier Lamien pisze: Hello folks, All dribbles packages are now branched into cvs repository with following branches : F-8, F-9 EL-5 Regards, -- Xavier.t Lamien -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien GPG-Key

sponsor needed

Hi, few months ago we spoke that I will become new Kino maintainer after Dominik. The rpmfusion infrastructure is coming near, so I have created an account at rpmfusion's fas and now I am waiting for a sponsor. The account name is sharkcz, the same as in Fedora. Thanks

Re: Orphaned Packages from Dribble

Hans de Goede píše v So 26. 04. 2008 v 12:33 +0200: Patrice Dumas wrote: On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:12:46PM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: I'd be happy to but I'm going on holiday tomorrow. I'll be back on May 4th. If no-one else has already picked it up I'll do my duty :) I had a