http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-07-01 17:41:34
---
The license you quote applies only to a small portion of the software. There
are several other licenses on the page you link to, including the lengthy
license
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #18 from leigh scott leigh123li...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-01
17:48:07 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
The license you quote applies only to a small portion of the software. There
are several other licenses on the page you link
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #19 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-07-02 00:16:32
---
Yes, this makes sense, and it also gives the true reason truecrypt is being
packaged at all.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #12 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-06-30
18:14:20 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
If I wanted to take over from Dominik would I need to start a new request?
No need to, but you can if you want a fresh start
I
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #13 from leigh scott leigh123li...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30
19:12:44 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
But seems it's hard to find someone to review it. Maybe you ask around (maybe
even on fedora-devel-list) for someone to
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #14 from leigh scott leigh123li...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30
22:41:18 ---
In preparation for the review I updated the version and cleaned up a bit.
SPEC:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-07-01 01:16:50
---
You need to remove this Free open-source part from the summary. This is a
blocker, non-Free packages have no business calling themselves Free
open-source.
--
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #16 from leigh scott leigh123li...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-01
02:22:31 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
You need to remove this Free open-source part from the summary. This is a
blocker, non-Free packages have no business calling
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
leigh scott leigh123li...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #11 from leigh scott leigh123li...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-12
12:36:32 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
If I wanted to take over from Dominik would I need to start a new request?
I also need to know that rpmfusion is willing to
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #7 from Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-13 16:23:56
---
An update from RH BZ #454667.
License as-is is non-free. Tom spot Callaway has mailed upstream to see if
they are interested in resolving the issues (plural)
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-19 14:49:42
---
I just noticed that truecrypt has also been submitted to Fedora for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454667
It has been marked for legal
13 matches
Mail list logo
