https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
Jeremy Newton alexjn...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #32 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-01-13 23:41:24 ---
I'm sorry to hear you've retracted this package for review. I personally think
this package is welcome for RPMFusion. We've uncovered some issues
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #30 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-01-11 14:45:52 ---
I just found another bug in this package. When trying to open a wma9 file, I
get this error:
$ totem attachment.cgi\?id\=122237\action\=view
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #25 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-01-10 13:57:29 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
What one can do is to apply Andreas's suggestion (i.e. ship the free bits),
own the directory were the codecs should land and
-
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
alsadi als...@ojuba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||als...@ojuba.org
---
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #27 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-01-10 17:53:55 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
should we put something like
find /home -type d -name '.gstreamer-0.10' | xargs -r /bin/rm -rf
in %post
or in
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #28 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-01-10 19:56:55 ---
(In reply to comment #27)
No, that doesn't solve the problem. The problem is that the w32codecs need to
be installed before any gstreamer application is launched
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-09 18:00:05 ---
So? It still needs w32codecs -- just because we cannot provide it does not mean
it is not a dependency for this package (to be at all useful).
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #17 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-01-09 20:49:19 ---
I just looked into autodownloader. Unfortunately this program is a non-root
program, so it can't write files to /usr/lib/codecs.
If we patch
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #19 from Andreas Thienemann andr...@bawue.net 2009-01-09
21:07:22 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Having a Requires: dependency on the w32 codecs makes this package not
installable on most systems.
This is surely not what is
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #20 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-09 21:17:46 ---
No, there is actually a w32codec package floating around various places.
(Search for it on rpm.pbone.net.)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #21 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-09 21:18:35 ---
(Mine came from ATrpms, but it appears they no longer ship it.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #23 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-09 21:42:32 ---
As opposed to not explicitly listing the dependency at all and expecting users
to somehow provide the pieces? How is that better?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #24 from Manuel Wolfshant wo...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-10
03:03:06 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
As opposed to not explicitly listing the dependency at all and expecting users
to somehow provide the pieces? How is that
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #10 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 14:28:08
---
spec:
http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/gstreamer-pitfdll/gstreamer-pitfdll.spec
srpm:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #8 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 12:51:10
---
Update package:
spec:
http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/gstreamer-pitfdll/gstreamer-pitfdll.spec
srpm:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-01-04 15:05:31 ---
Here's the review:
Please add an extra comment to the description mentioning this plugin requires
external win32 codecs which can't be
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||erik-
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||3
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-01 20:17:25
---
(In reply to comment #1)
- This package is only useful in combination with win32 codecs. Are you (or
someone else) willing to package/maintain this for
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-01 22:21:41
---
The w32codecs aren't legally distributable. I know some sites do it anyway, but
that doesn't mean it's legal. ;-)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-02 01:41:21
---
There's no license (at least not from the actual copyright holders) which would
allow distributing them. The default in copyright law is that distribution is
not
24 matches
Mail list logo
