http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #19 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-08-05 14:48:21
---
Ping ping.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #18 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-06-04 12:11:55
---
Ping.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #17 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-02-18 14:07:16
---
(In reply to comment #16)
You should not post SPEC file in a bugzilla entry but you must provide two link
one to the spec file and one to the src.rpm. These
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #13 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-02-17 10:22:40
---
Ping. Any update?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #15 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-02-17 12:14:24
---
(In reply to comment #14)
I have been trying to get a sponsor with no luck. I will keep trying though.
Update this package (and any other package you have
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #14 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-02-17 12:06:43
---
(In reply to comment #13)
Ping. Any update?
I have been trying to get a sponsor with no luck. I will keep trying though.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #16 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-02-18 01:30:17
---
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #14)
I have been trying to get a sponsor with no luck. I will keep trying though.
Update this package (and
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||30
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #8 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 15:03:21 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
I will make the proper changes and report back. Can you suggest a hosting
site?
Because you already have a
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 12:15:07
---
(In reply to comment #4)
The application already installs a .desktop file itself. I will take a look at
the mupen64 srpm.
If that is the case, you are not
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #3 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 11:26:23 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Please be as kind as to NOT ignore the warning about the line too long. Proper
formatting helps in displaying properly in package
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 11:20:37
---
You are not providing a desktop file, which is mandatory for a GUI application:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
Please also see
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #4 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 11:27:40 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
You are not providing a desktop file, which is mandatory for a GUI
application:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
Manuel Wolfshant wo...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-06 04:59:33
---
And for the optflags I am guessing I am supposed to split out a devel package?
No, you are supposed to make sure that the optimization flags contained in the
18 matches
Mail list logo
