[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|2 | Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 FeRD (Frank Dana) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ferd...@gmail.com --- Comment #52

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #51 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- >From https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Create_a_package_review_request : "Please do not submit more than one package per per Bugzilla entry. It would be very very difficult to follow the review

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #50 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #49) ... > The correct procedure per Fedora policy would have been to open a new ticket. Indeed, this also apply to RPM Fusion, even as an admin we cannot bypass

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||susi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #49

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #48 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- And applied to packagers group. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list --

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #47 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- Thank you for the review Donimique and Leight for the pointers. I will request new package right away. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #45 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- Better keep the i686 for the time being to prevent complaints. It will be removed in a future. Here is the updated spec and srpms build for mendeley 1.19.4 SPEC:

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #44 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- You can package 1.19.4, which doesn't require the private symbols, in the meantime. By the way, does it still make sense to package the i686 version? -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #43 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- Interesting enough, Fedora 27 version of qt5-qtbase provided the missing libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5_PRIVATE_API) as seen on https://pkgs.org/download/libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5_PRIVATE_API). I contacted upstream

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #42 from leigh scott --- (In reply to Vitaly Zaitsev from comment #41) > > What remained is the bundled qt library issue when attempting to install > > mendeleydesktop > > You must unbundle it. > > Then add to your SPEC: >

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vit...@easycoding.org --- Comment #41

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #40 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- (In reply to leigh scott from comment #39) > Koji will probably choke on this > > > # Set exclusivity for x86 based architecture > %ifarch x86_64 > ExclusiveArch:x86_64 > %else >

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #39 from leigh scott --- Koji will probably choke on this # Set exclusivity for x86 based architecture %ifarch x86_64 ExclusiveArch: x86_64 %else ExclusiveArch: i686 %endif Use ExclusiveArch: x86_64 i686 also change

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #38 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- Updating from upstream following the reviewer suggestion unfortunately failed to execute. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #37 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- Here is the updated files SPECS: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/luyatshimbalanga/mendeley-rpm/master/mendeleydesktop.spec SRPMS:

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #36 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- > I'd suggest something like: > %prep > %ifarch i686 > %setup -q -n mendeleydesktop-%{version}-linux-i486 > %else > %setup -q -b 1 -T -n mendeleydesktop-%{version}-linux-%{_target_cpu} > %endif I

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #35 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #33) > Actually you can't even do that. Making the Source: conditional is wrong and > leads to non-reproducible SRPMs (i.e. if you rpmbuild -bs

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #34 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} Strict arched dependency is not actually necessary. The plugin communicates with mendeleydesktop over HTTP on localhost TCP socket, so

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #33 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #32) > (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #30) [...] > > 2. The application is available for i686 as well: > >

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #32 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #30) > 1. Latest version is 1.19.3. Fixed. > > 2. The application is available for i686 as well: > https://www.mendeley.com/download-desktop/

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #31 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- (In reply to leigh scott from comment #29) > (In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #28) > > > I am seeking for sponsorship. > > It isn't required as your fedoraproject.org packager status is

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #29 from leigh scott --- (In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #28) > I am seeking for sponsorship. It isn't required as your fedoraproject.org packager status is recognized here. I note you haven't completed the CLA.

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #26 from Mark Harfouche --- Sorry Nicolas, I had totally forgotten about this. I guess a lot has changed since 2016 and I no longer have Fedora installed. Ultimately, I couldn't afford to stay on bleeding edge gcc (and the lib64

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Mark Harfouche from comment #24) > Works On My Machine. You were expected to add the updated RPM links on this report. Please consider to remind if the no communication by one week. Also

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #24 from Mark Harfouche --- Works On My Machine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Sérgio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #22 from Mark Harfouche --- I updated and tested it on my F27 machine. See github. WOMM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Mark Harfouche from comment #19) > Sorry, the lastest version is untested. Don't have access to Fedora at the > moment. Please try to update the review as soon as

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added namespace||nonfree -- You

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #19 from Mark Harfouche --- Sorry, the lastest version is untested. Don't have access to Fedora at the moment. (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #18) > (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #18 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #14) > (In reply to Mark Harfouche from comment #13) > > Reviving this bug because I think I addressed the previous

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #17 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #16) [...] > Then maybe you can drop the i486 package and only package the x86_64 as > ExclusiveArch: x86_64. > > If any

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Mark Harfouche from comment #15) ... > > Fedora default to i686 nowadays (-march), so if this binary is really built > > for i486, it could lead to issue. Anyone tested it

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #15 from Mark Harfouche --- Hi Nicolas Thanks for replying. (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #14) > > This is my first RPM Fusion Package. I am seeking a sponsor. > Rathann can sponsor you. Thanks

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Mark Harfouche from comment #13) > Reviving this bug because I think I addressed the previous issues. Thanks > Dominik. ... > This is my first RPM Fusion Package. I am

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #12 from Mark Harfouche 2016-05-04 00:40:57 CEST --- In the meantime, it is probably worth upvoting this bug:

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #11 from Mark Harfouche 2016-05-04 00:39:49 CEST --- Ok Mendeley's website is being problematic with me. I can't even open links in chrome, nor can I post something to feedback.mendeley.com I'm trying to

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #10 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2016-05-03 21:33:02 CEST --- I see it now, thanks. Maybe adding these screenshots (especially the one from the dock with original 48px and 64px icons present) will

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #9 from Mark Harfouche 2016-05-03 20:23:24 CEST --- I added screenshots showing the problem. You can see that mendeley looks to have a white background. While it is not a horrendous mistake to have a white

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #8 from Mark Harfouche 2016-05-03 20:21:06 CEST --- Created attachment 1570 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1570 Mendeley icons 128, 64 and 48 side by side for comparison Notice how

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #7 from Mark Harfouche 2016-05-03 20:19:55 CEST --- Created attachment 1569 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1569 Mendeley on the dock removing icons 64 and 48 -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #6 from Mark Harfouche 2016-05-03 20:19:35 CEST --- Created attachment 1568 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1568 Mendeley on the dock keeping icons 64 and 48 -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2016-05-02 21:30:12 CEST --- (In reply to comment #4) > 1. Is the permission I got from message boards enough to distribute Mendeley > in > RPMFusion? (See github

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #4 from Mark Harfouche 2016-05-02 21:01:50 CEST --- Hi, I wanted to summarize the previous posts: 1. Is the permission I got from message boards enough to distribute Mendeley in RPMFusion? (See github

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #3 from Mark Harfouche 2016-04-26 01:36:14 CEST --- 1. Wow, OK I understand what you did. You basically went through every binary that was inside mendeleydesktop and tried to find where it was from. You

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Comment #2 from Mark Harfouche 2016-04-26 01:18:39 CEST --- I removed my package from COPR. Thank you for your notes. I did get permission to redistribute, at least through their forum. Do we need a more

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Mark Harfouche changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||30 --

[Bug 4041] Review request: mendeleydesktop - rpm of Mendeley

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Mark Harfouche changed: What|Removed |Added URL|