https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
Andrew Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #50 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #49)
> Pardon my newness to rpmfusion. After seeing the note stating bohdi is not
> running yet, I did an "rfpkg update" from the command line,
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #49 from Andrew Bauer ---
Pardon my newness to rpmfusion. After seeing the note stating bohdi is not
running yet, I did an "rfpkg update" from the command line, similar to what I
would do to push a
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #46 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #45)
@Antonio can you push the "fedora-review" flag to "+" in this review.
This is the new way to approve package (same as Fedora IIRC).
--
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #44 from Antonio Trande ---
$ mock --no-clean -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free --shell 'rpmlint
zoneminder-debuginfo'
INFO: mock.py version 1.4.2 starting (python version = 3.6.1)...
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #41 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #40)
>
> F26 SRPM:
> http://zmrepo.zoneminder.com/f/testing/26/x86_64/zoneminder-1.30.4-3.fc26.
> x86_64.rpm
>
SRPM??
--
You are
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #38 from Andrew Bauer ---
ZoneMinder uses the CakePHP project as the framework for ZoneMinder's API.
We've also added the Crud project as a plugin to the CakePHP framework. Crud is
configured as a
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #36 from Andrew Bauer ---
After upgrading my workstation F25 -> F26, I observed that rpmlint -v
zoneminder takes an unusually long time to complete.
If I wait 1-2 minutes, it eventually completes
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #35 from Andrew Bauer ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #34)
> - There something wrong after installing zoneminder: 'rpmlint' does not
> finish its checks:
>
> $ rpmlint -v zoneminder
>
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #34 from Antonio Trande ---
- There something wrong after installing zoneminder: 'rpmlint' does not finish
its checks:
$ rpmlint -v zoneminder
zoneminder.x86_64: I: checking
zoneminder.x86_64: E:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #33 from Andrew Bauer ---
Understood. Thanks for the heads up.
perl-Net-SFTP-Foreign is experiencing dependency issues in rawhide due to some
per-math package not building on latest perl.
--
You
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #32 from Antonio Trande ---
I can't build on rawhide yet, because of some broken dependencies among
packages.
I will review this package as soon as possible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #31 from Andrew Bauer ---
Thanks for the feedback. It turns out I needed to make some additional changes
as well.
I can mock build the following on f27.
srpm:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #30 from Michael Cronenworth ---
(In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #29)
> Right, you guys are building against F27 now, which I have not tested yet.
> This does build against f24, f25, el6, & el7, but I image
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #29 from Andrew Bauer ---
Right, you guys are building against F27 now, which I have not tested yet.
This does build against f24, f25, el6, & el7, but I image you will want this to
build against
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #28 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #27)
> Thank you Antonio for reviewing this.
>
> The latest release, 1.30.4, srpm & specfile are here:
>
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #27 from Andrew Bauer ---
Thank you Antonio for reviewing this.
The latest release, 1.30.4, srpm & specfile are here:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #25 from Andrew Bauer ---
Greetings Xavier,
Thank you for the prodding me. Following up here has been in the back of mind
for a couple weeks now.
With the help of Damian, all of ZoneMinder's
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #24 from Xavier Bachelot ---
The review was on hold because of missing dependencies in Fedora.
Andrew, are all the dependencies available now ? And is the specfile up to date
?
I can take care of the review
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #23 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Is there any spec file update for this review ?
Anyone can step in as a reviewer ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Bauer ---
This is just a ping to let everyone know I am still making progress on this,
even though it doesn't show in this particular bug report.
I have been making slow, but steady
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Bauer ---
I've made further progress on this.
(In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #19)
> A couple more comments on the spec...
>
> - Which supported distro/releases don't have
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Bauer ---
I can absolutely knock those those changes out, but what follows are some
questions to help get it right in one pass.
(In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #19)
> -
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #19 from Xavier Bachelot ---
A couple more comments on the spec...
- Which supported distro/releases don't have %make_build ?
Thus, is this really needed :
"""
# In some cases older distros do not have this
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #18 from Xavier Bachelot ---
No worries, keep on learning, you are on the right track :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Bauer ---
You bet. These are my first two Fedora package requests:
perl-X10: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409869
perl-Astro-SunTime:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #16 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Answering myself :
perl-X10 : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409869
perl-Astro-SunTime : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409866
--
You are
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #15 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Can you please provide links to the review requests for the missing perl
modules ? perl-Astro-Suntime at least, others if any.
Error: nothing provides perl(Astro::SunTime) needed by
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Bauer ---
A new SRPM and specfile is ready for peer review:
srpm:
https://zmrepo.zoneminder.com/f/testing/25/SRPMS/zoneminder-1.30.1-2.fc25.src.rpm
spec:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Bauer ---
Excellent feedback. Seems we are getting some momentum.
I am part of the upstream development team and will push the changes concerning
runtimedirectory.
I'm falling
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #12 from Damian Wrobel ---
(In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #9)
> (In reply to Damian Wrobel from comment #8)
> >
> > 2) Missing directory for pid file:
> > Creating /var/run/zoneminer directory
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
Tomasz Torcz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zdzi...@irc.pl
---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Bauer ---
(In reply to Damian Wrobel from comment #8)
> Please find a few additional comments from an attempt to run version:
> 1.30.1-1 on a new F25:
>
> 1)
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Bauer ---
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #4)
> CentOS/RHEL 6 must have %make_build macro. You not need to define it
> manually.
I took a harder look at where %make_build
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #6 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
And it is realy require vlc-devel?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #5 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Next suggestions:
1. %global zmuid $(id -un)
%global zmgid $(id -gn)
Not used and can be removed.
2. If COPYING - is a license text it must be not in %doc, but
%license COPYING
--
You
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
(In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #2)
> I noticed that my centos 6 environment did not have the %make_build macro so
> I defined it at the top of the specfile should it not exist at
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Bauer ---
Thank you for the feedback. I have made all five suggested changes.
I noticed that my centos 6 environment did not have the %make_build macro so I
defined it at the top of
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
45 matches
Mail list logo