[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-26 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-21 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 Richard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-16 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #32 from Richard --- The specific error is that the noarch -data packages are different on different arches. I have moved the symlink to the main package and started new builds. -- You are receiving this mail

Re: [Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-16 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2018-03-16 16:14 GMT+01:00 Richard Shaw : > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:45 AM, RPM Fusion Bugzilla > wrote: >> >> Comment # 31 on bug 4647 from Nicolas Chauvet >> >> (In reply to Richard from comment #25) >> > SPEC:

Re: [Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-16 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:45 AM, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: > *Comment # 31 on > bug 4647 from Nicolas > Chauvet * > > (In reply to Richard

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-16 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #31 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Richard from comment #25) > SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3fy23xaw163ap5/unifi.spec?dl=0 > SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q6vi2pfpv5wgkbi/unifi-5.7.20-1.fc27.src.rpm >

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-16 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #30 from Richard --- (In reply to leigh scott from comment #28) > (In reply to Richard from comment #27) > > Yes, I was just trying to get something to work for now :) I'll see about > > implementing your

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-15 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #29 from leigh scott --- or you forgot the name space (free,nonfree) [leigh@localhost ~]$ pkgdb-admin list #212 (Awaiting Review) - hobbes1069 requested the new package "rpms/unifi" on "master"

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-15 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-15 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 Richard changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||4 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-15 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #27 from Richard --- Yes, I was just trying to get something to work for now :) I'll see about implementing your method. I was trying to think of a way that if a new arch is added that it will cause the build

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-15 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review?

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-03-14 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #25 from Richard --- SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3fy23xaw163ap5/unifi.spec?dl=0 SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q6vi2pfpv5wgkbi/unifi-5.7.20-1.fc27.src.rpm * Thu Mar 08 2018 Richard Shaw

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-02-21 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #24 from Richard --- SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3fy23xaw163ap5/unifi.spec SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/yojdfmlddxvf3dk/unifi-5.6.30-2.fc27.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Feb 21 2018 Richard Shaw

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-02-21 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #23 from Richard --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #22) > 1. Simplify this: > # For execstack > %if 0%{?rhel} > Requires: prelink > %else > Requires: execstack > %endif > > into: >

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-02-21 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #22 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- 1. Simplify this: # For execstack %if 0%{?rhel} Requires: prelink %else Requires: execstack %endif into: BuildRequires: %{_bindir}/execstack It should be

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-01-26 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #21 from Richard --- SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3fy23xaw163ap5/unifi.spec SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ekiicxjcbj9g1yg/unifi-5.6.30-1.fc27.src.rpm * Fri Jan 26 2018 Richard Shaw

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-01-19 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #20 from Richard --- I'm not a web/css expert so maybe you can help but while I see FontAwesome setup as a fontface I can't find anywhere where it's actually used grepping through the webroot... -- You are

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-01-18 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #19 from Richard --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #18) > > SPEC and SRPM spec differ: Whoops, I moved my Fedora stuff to a different dropbox account and they just got out of sync.

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-01-17 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #18 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to Richard from comment #17) > SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3fy23xaw163ap5/unifi.spec > SRPM:

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2018-01-03 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #17 from Richard --- SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3fy23xaw163ap5/unifi.spec SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/s0lbqv7xxslf9g4/unifi-5.6.29-1.fc27.src.rpm * Tue Jan 02 2018 Richard Shaw

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-12-05 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #16 from Richard --- SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dz2x7dlixt2qjju/unifi.spec SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/grue05674f5qnjp/unifi-5.6.22-2.fc26.src.rpm * Tue Dec 5 2017 Richard Shaw

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-11-28 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #15 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to Richard from comment #14) > (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #13) > > Some easy things to fix: [...] > > 2. Run execstack in

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-11-28 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #14 from Richard --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #13) > Some easy things to fix: > 1. Don't ship both armv7hl and x86_64 jni binary. Easy enough. > 2. Run execstack in %prep or

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-11-26 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-11-25 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #12 from Richard --- Sorry, I had already updated to a newer version, the HTML was for a 404 not found :) SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dz2x7dlixt2qjju/unifi.spec SRPM:

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-11-25 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #11 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- I have quite a lot of experience packaging vendor binaries, so I can pick this up. However, please check the src.rpm URL. What I get with wget is not a src.rpm but

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-10-28 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #10 from Richard --- SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dz2x7dlixt2qjju/unifi.spec SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/tk2m6wpaosdcev6/unifi-5.5.20-5.fc26.src.rpm * Sat Oct 28 2017 Richard Shaw

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-09-16 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #9 from Richard --- SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dz2x7dlixt2qjju/unifi.spec SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/rp7ud31vi0cjhbd/unifi-5.5.20-4.fc26.src.rpm * Sat Sep 16 2017 Richard Shaw

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-09-14 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #8 from Richard --- Ok, per Dan Walsh doing the selinux stuff in %post is acceptable, I can combine the commands though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-09-13 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #7 from Richard --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #1) > It doesn't look acceptable to edit the selinux configuration on post > installation. First you need not to assume selinux might not run at all

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-09-13 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-09-13 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #5 from Richard --- I tried adding the "missingok" and commenting out the touch for EL6 but the build failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee

Re: [Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-09-12 Thread Stuart Gathman
On 09/12/2017 04:00 PM, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: > > *Comment # 4 > on bug 4647 from > Richard * > (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #1

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-09-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #4 from Richard --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #1) > %ghost is availabe with EL6. I don't understand why you think it was not. > What is available with newer OS is that it does not require the

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-09-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #3 from Richard --- I guess I can create a bash script and put it in /usr/sbin... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-09-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #2 from Richard --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #1) > I expect you talked about the nonfree section since it's proprietary > (the namespace is set as appropriate). > > > You can use NoSource: 0

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

2017-09-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet --- I expect you talked about the nonfree section since it's proprietary (the namespace is set as appropriate). You can use NoSource: 0 (After Source0) instead of using with conditional