https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |4
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #21 from Petr Menšík ---
In the mean time minizip-ng were made backward compatible with previous
minizip, so no change is needed to use it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #20 from Petr Menšík ---
SPEC URL: https://github.com/pemensik/etlegacy/raw/fedora/etlegacy.spec
SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/srpm/etlegacy-2.81.0-1.fc39.src.rpm
Prepared a new update of etlegacy. Removed renderer
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
FeRD (Frank Dana) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ferd...@gmail.com
--- Comment #19
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #18 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Also, please filter the internal libraries from Provides:
Provides: ... librenderer_opengl1_x86_64.so()(64bit)
librenderer_opengl2_x86_64.so()(64bit)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #16 from Petr Menšík ---
SPEC URL: https://github.com/pemensik/etlegacy/raw/fedora/etlegacy.spec
SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/srpm/etlegacy-2.80.2-3.fc36.src.rpm
Still built also on COPR as well:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #15 from Petr Menšík ---
I think JPEGTURBO dependency is satisfied by normal jpeg-devel library. So it
can be just ignored for now. I doubt it would make a visible difference
anywhere with the game.
Okay, glvnd seems like preferred
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||domi...@greysector.net
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #13 from Petr Menšík ---
SPEC URL: https://github.com/pemensik/etlegacy/raw/fedora/etlegacy.spec
SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/srpm/etlegacy-2.80.2-2.fc36.src.rpm
Found strange issue in F36+, where it did not work
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
namespace|free|nonfree
--- Comment #12 from Petr Menšík
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #11 from Petr Menšík ---
Another update, adds more integrated installer in separate subpackage
etlegacy-installer. It should run installer if data are not yet installed, can
be run by etl-installer manually too.
Supports both
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #10 from Petr Menšík ---
Forgot to increase release, current SRPM is different. Scratch build remains.
SPEC URL: https://github.com/pemensik/etlegacy/raw/fedora/etlegacy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #9 from Petr Menšík ---
I have finally found why is x86_64 build unusable! I disabled autoupdates in
package build and deleted *.mp.$(arch).so from ~/.etlegacy/legacy. Then found
that is mandatory part and unlike i386 arch, the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #8 from Petr Menšík ---
Scratch build including 32b builds:
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=507508
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #7 from Petr Menšík ---
Found and fixed quite strange issues on my F34, which just always crashed the
process.
Also made good usability improvement (I think), the game instructs you how to
obtain data from local HTML page if data
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #6 from Petr Menšík ---
I have updated etlegacy for a new release.
SPEC URL: https://github.com/pemensik/etlegacy/raw/fedora/etlegacy.spec
SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/srpm/etlegacy-2.78.0-1.fc34.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Thanks for this submission. It would be fine for this package to be reviewed.
Can you rise the point on the rpmfusion-devel mailing list ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #4 from Petr Menšík ---
Rebased to new version. Tried new test build [1].
SPEC URL: https://github.com/pemensik/etlegacy/raw/fedora/etlegacy.spec
SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/srpm/etlegacy-2.77.1-1.fc34.src.rpm
1.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík ---
Spec URL: https://github.com/pemensik/etlegacy/raw/fedora/etlegacy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/srpm/etlegacy-2.76-2.20201102git886f0ef0.fc34.src.rpm
Updated a bit spec. Updates to more
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #2 from Petr Menšík ---
Easier way to install:
dnf install game-data-packager
game-data-packager enemy-territory
sudo dnf install ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/enemy-territory-data-*.noarch.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5824
--- Comment #1 from Petr Menšík ---
How to download additional data:
- Download original client [1].
- curl -LO https://cdn.splashdamage.com/downloads/games/wet/et260b.x86_full.zip
- unzip et260b.x86_full.zip
- sh et260b.x86_keygen_V03.run
24 matches
Mail list logo
