https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
>All items looks good
>
>Package APPROVED
Thanks for the review (and work on rpmfusion-review !)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Marcus Müller from comment #2)
...
> In that case allow me the uplifting remark that if you feel like the project
> is ready to get packaged, it's probably good enough for a 1.0.0 release.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
--- Comment #3 from Sérgio Basto ---
/usr/bin/fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org -b 5932 -m
fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free
with this patch [1] to have a better user experience :
[1]
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
--- Comment #2 from Marcus Müller ---
General question:
You're actively involved with upstream libndi, right?
In that case allow me the uplifting remark that if you feel like the project is
ready to get packaged, it's probably good enough for
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
Marcus Müller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcus_rpmfusion@hostalia.d
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Group|Package Reviews |
CC list accessible|1
