[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-21 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-15 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from

[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-15 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 --- Comment #8 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place

[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-15 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 --- Comment #7 from Julian Sikorski --- Fair enough. Feel free to pick up any of the parts of my spec you find useful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___

[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-14 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Julian Sikorski from comment #5) > Is there a reason for this to go to RPM Fusion? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077910 As said earlier, there is a need for a nvdec

[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-14 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 Julian Sikorski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||beleg...@gmail.com --- Comment #5

[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-14 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet --- FYI, I don't remember the previous discution with upstream about this issue: https://github.com/intel/libva/pull/554#issuecomment-1155341757 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-14 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 --- Comment #3 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- Please add Conflicts: libva-vdpau-driver%{?_isa} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing

[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-14 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 --- Comment #2 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- This package contains %{_libdir}/dri/nvidia_drv_video.so and conflicts with libva-vdpau-driver. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-14 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug 6331] Review request: nvidia-vaapi-driver - VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend

2022-06-14 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6331 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Group|Package Reviews | CC list accessible|1