>Antonio , some time ago we (RPMFusion) agree use x264-0.148 in el7
Does exist any else past decision that i need to know before to do again
everything?
PS.
Mail sent without GPG signature via gmail.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 3:32 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-11-22 at 14:00 +0100, Anton
On Thu, 2018-11-22 at 14:00 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
> It's a possibility, but i must rebuild all related packages again!
Antonio , some time ago we (RPMFusion) agree use x264-0.148 in el7 ( I
was not sure when wrote to you some day ago) .
We choose x264-0.148 because is really stable. After 3
It's a possibility, but i must rebuild all related packages again!
On 22/11/18 13:16, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Use x264-0.148 instead!
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpm
Use x264-0.148 instead!
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Hi all.
As you know, i'm rebasing some packages on el7 branch against x264-0.155.
'gstreamer-plugins-ugly-1.10.5' on epel7 is not ready for 'x264-0.155'
but can be patched for this. Is anyone able to create a patch for
'gstreamer-plugins-ugly-1.10.5'?
For info:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstr