On 07/11/2012 03:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/02/2012 03:11 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
What I expect is that ffmpeg in EL-6 will better match with mplayer in
F-17 as the ffmpeg version is the same. But others
On 07/02/2012 03:11 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
What I expect is that ffmpeg in EL-6 will better match with mplayer in
F-17 as the ffmpeg version is the same. But others components are
involved, so you have to test a mock
2012/7/2 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com:
Need some help here. When I did a local mock build of mplayer
1.0-0.139 it built fine but now I'm getting this error with 1.1:
fmt-conversion.c:68: error: 'PIX_FMT_YUVA422P' undeclared here (not in
a function)
Any ideas?
You constantly fail to
2012/7/2 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/7/2 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com:
Need some help here. When I did a local mock build of mplayer
1.0-0.139 it built fine but now I'm getting this error with 1.1:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
What I expect is that ffmpeg in EL-6 will better match with mplayer in
F-17 as the ffmpeg version is the same. But others components are
involved, so you have to test a mock built and do a minimal runtime
test.
Building
The mplayer from F-17 branch built fine locally against mpg123-1.13.7.
Richard
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Need some help here. When I did a local mock build of mplayer
1.0-0.139 it built fine but now I'm getting this error with 1.1:
We should probably stick with mplayer-1.0-0.139. I've been using
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Need some help here. When I did a local mock build of mplayer
1.0-0.139 it built fine but now I'm getting this error with 1.1:
We should probably
