On Dom, 2014-11-02 at 08:02 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 15.10.2014 o 07:42, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 15.10.2014 o 00:38, Sérgio Basto pisze:
Hi,
On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the
W dniu 15.10.2014 o 07:42, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 15.10.2014 o 00:38, Sérgio Basto pisze:
Hi,
On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the maintained
branches list:
Hi, I don't believe in myself , I call it ffmpeg-2.4.3 , to emphasize that
was a new ffmpeg release , not 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 , but in fact was a rebuild
for ffmpeg-2.4.2 , is the 3rd release of ffmpeg-2.4 (0, 1 and 2) but it is
ffmpeg-2.4.2 . I just notice this today .
Sorry about this confusion ...
On 23/10/14 09:15, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2014-10-22 14:26 GMT+02:00 David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au
mailto:dti...@iinet.net.au:
On 22/10/14 23:23, David Timms wrote:
No testing of the binary package at all, but I think the changes seem
good. I don't have commit access so
On 21/10/14 01:22, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com
mailto:kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Please lead the rebuild so everything can be done in one push.
I may hold the rawhide push until everything get in.
But I would also have
On 22/10/14 23:23, David Timms wrote:
No testing of the binary package at all, but I think the changes seem
good. I don't have commit access so someone else will need sort that
side out, see attached.
If no super-packager can commit, then I can make a bug to hold the
patches, just let me
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:26 PM, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On 22/10/14 23:23, David Timms wrote:
No testing of the binary package at all, but I think the changes seem
good. I don't have commit access so someone else will need sort that
side out, see attached.
If no
2014-10-22 14:26 GMT+02:00 David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au:
On 22/10/14 23:23, David Timms wrote:
No testing of the binary package at all, but I think the changes seem
good. I don't have commit access so someone else will need sort that
side out, see attached.
If no super-packager can
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-10-19 2:27 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
On Sex, 2014-10-17 at 07:37 +1100, David Timms wrote:
I expect to have another look this weekend; however, don't hold up the
update just due dvbcut...
OK,
2014-10-19 2:27 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
On Sex, 2014-10-17 at 07:37 +1100, David Timms wrote:
I expect to have another look this weekend; however, don't hold up the
update just due dvbcut...
OK, so seems we don't have big issues , kwizart also agreed.
So if no
On Sex, 2014-10-17 at 07:37 +1100, David Timms wrote:
I expect to have another look this weekend; however, don't hold up the
update just due dvbcut...
OK, so seems we don't have big issues , kwizart also agreed.
So if no impediments, I plan star mass rebuild for ffmpeg-2.4, tomorrow
Sunday,
On 15/10/14 16:42, Julian Sikorski wrote:
...
I don't think anything has changed since last time: dvbcut and
kmediafactory fail to rebuild, vlc needs a patch, everything else builds
fine. David Timms was working on making dvbcut work, but I have not
heard from him regarding whether he was
Hi,
On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the maintained
branches list:
https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-September/162904.html
Thus, if we ever rebase F-20, we should use 2.2 and not 2.3.
The mode
W dniu 15.10.2014 o 00:38, Sérgio Basto pisze:
Hi,
On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the maintained
branches list:
https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-September/162904.html
Thus, if we ever rebase
W dniu 04.10.2014 o 11:39, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 21:04, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto
ser...@serjux.com
mailto:ser...@serjux.com:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2014-09-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Julian
W dniu 07.10.2014 o 08:02, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 04.10.2014 o 11:39, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 21:04, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto
ser...@serjux.com
mailto:ser...@serjux.com:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 21:04, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto
ser...@serjux.com
mailto:ser...@serjux.com:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2014-09-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski
beleg...@gmail.com
On 02/10/14 22:52, David Timms wrote:
On 02/10/14 15:36, Julian Sikorski wrote:
..
Which packages are remaining please ?
dvbcut and kmediafactory.
I should have time this weekend to look at my dvbcut package.
Any hints welcome...
Dave.
I did a mock test build with:
mock -r
W dniu 02.10.2014 o 07:41, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 02.10.2014 o 01:46, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qua, 2014-10-01 at 19:38 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:51, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26,
On 02/10/14 15:36, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 01.10.2014 o 23:03, David Timms pisze:
On 02/10/14 03:51, Julian Sikorski wrote:
...
Looks like we are almost there. The two remaining packages have not been
touched by upstream in ages and maybe we should reconsider whether it is
worth
On Qui, 2014-10-02 at 07:41 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 02.10.2014 o 01:46, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qua, 2014-10-01 at 19:38 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:51, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2014
On Qui, 2014-10-02 at 08:00 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hi , Julian , that is the point, this is cvs , we don't have
upgrading
in parallel, I try rolling devel to branches and yes overwrite
the f20
spec and what is in f20 spec is discard. Is the only rule of
organization that we have .
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 14:29 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
mplayer
I'm still seeing this on my F21 up to date system:
Error: nothing provides libavutil.so.54()(64bit) needed by
mplayer-1.1-28.20140919svn.fc21.x86_64. nothing provides
libavutil.so.54()(64bit) needed by
On Qua, 2014-10-01 at 15:38 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 14:29 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
mplayer
I'm still seeing this on my F21 up to date system:
Error: nothing provides libavutil.so.54()(64bit) needed by
mplayer-1.1-28.20140919svn.fc21.x86_64. nothing provides
W dniu 01.10.2014 o 16:38, Ankur Sinha pisze:
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 14:29 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
mplayer
I'm still seeing this on my F21 up to date system:
Error: nothing provides libavutil.so.54()(64bit) needed by
mplayer-1.1-28.20140919svn.fc21.x86_64. nothing provides
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:51, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200,
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 19:23 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
t is related. Try doing
# yum downgrade ffmpeg\*
I only have 2.3.3 here:
[asinha@localhost 99_Current_papers]$ rpm -qa \*ffmpeg\*
ffmpeg-libs-2.3.3-3.fc21.x86_64
gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.13-13.fc21.x86_64
ffmpeg-2.3.3-3.fc21.x86_64
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 19:11, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 19:03, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is
not bad given the extent of API changes:
On 02/10/14 03:51, Julian Sikorski wrote:
...
Looks like we are almost there. The two remaining packages have not been
touched by upstream in ages and maybe we should reconsider whether it is
worth carrying them.
Which packages are remaining please ?
On 10/01/2014 12:43 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Should I still attempt the downgrade?
No. You need to downgrade mplayer.
mplayer was built against ffmpeg 2.4, but you do not have ffmpeg 2.4 installed.
Hi
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
mplayer was built against ffmpeg 2.4, but you do not have ffmpeg 2.4
installed.
Well, ffmpeg 2.4 is not available in the repository yet for some reason
Rahul
On Qua, 2014-10-01 at 19:38 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:51, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2014
On Qua, 2014-10-01 at 18:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 10/01/2014 12:43 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Should I still attempt the downgrade?
No. You need to downgrade mplayer.
mplayer was built against ffmpeg 2.4, but you do not have ffmpeg 2.4
installed.
yes ,
The packages
W dniu 01.10.2014 o 23:03, David Timms pisze:
On 02/10/14 03:51, Julian Sikorski wrote:
...
Looks like we are almost there. The two remaining packages have not been
touched by upstream in ages and maybe we should reconsider whether it is
worth carrying them.
Which packages are remaining
W dniu 01.10.2014 o 19:43, Ankur Sinha pisze:
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 19:23 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
t is related. Try doing
# yum downgrade ffmpeg\*
I only have 2.3.3 here:
[asinha@localhost 99_Current_papers]$ rpm -qa \*ffmpeg\*
ffmpeg-libs-2.3.3-3.fc21.x86_64
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 21:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
SO I NAK the ffmpeg update in F-20 because the way the update was
done
in Rawhide.
I don't want to hear about it. This is not acceptable not to have
coordinated the update.
Sorry I'm in work and can't focus, I already sent
Hi!,
On Sex, 2014-09-26 at 07:24 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hi,
it seems like we had a bit of misunderstanding. I was under the
impression we are good to go with 2.4 in rawhide, and 2.2/2.3 for F20
is
what we were discussing.
yes , as we have cvs, to avoid confusions etc, we like
On 26/09/2014 14:15, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 21:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
SO I NAK the ffmpeg update in F-20 because the way the update was
done
in Rawhide.
I don't want to hear about it. This is not acceptable not to have
coordinated the update.
Sorry I'm in work and
On 09/26/2014 07:29 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
Ssome packages were published already :
ffmpeg
mplayer
xine-lib
Additionnaly, k3b-extras-freeworld was built earlier today but is not
pushed yet.
I'm not sure what remains to be rebuilt against ffmpeg 2.4, but at least
mplayer, xine-lib and
On 25/09/2014 07:47, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed,
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 10:06 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
xine-lib passed a local rebuild and is now building in plague.
Hi,
I get this at the moment:
Error: package mpd-1:0.18.11-2.fc21.x86_64 requires
libavcodec.so.55()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed.
package
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
coming up. I have done a test and only 4
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
2014-09-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2014-09-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:56, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is
not bad given the extent of API
On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 06:50 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 22.09.2014 o 05:35, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
On 09/21/2014 11:20 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another
W dniu 22.09.2014 o 16:57, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 06:50 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 22.09.2014 o 05:35, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
On 09/21/2014 11:20 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released
On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 18:46 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
The upstream-tracker.org website reveals that no symbols were removed
between ffmpeg-2.1 and ffmpeg-2.3. Conversely, ffmpeg-2.4 has 20
symbols
removed vs 2.3.3.
Finally, the reason I was suggesting moving away from ffmpeg-2.1 is
due
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is
not bad given the extent of API changes:
- alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45: error: 'struct a52_ctx' has
no member named 'frame'
- dvbcut:
W dniu 21.09.2014 o 19:03, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is
not bad given the extent of API changes:
- alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is
not bad given the extent of API changes:
- alsa-plugins-freeworld:
On 09/21/2014 11:20 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is
not bad given the extent of API changes:
W dniu 22.09.2014 o 05:35, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
On 09/21/2014 11:20 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed,
56 matches
Mail list logo
