After my fail on mention subtitleripper is not is repos, I made another
report, for example subtitleripper was missed on F17 but backed on F18
-subtitleripper 16_17
+subtitleripper 17_18
On Ter, 2016-08-30 at 02:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2016-08-25 at 20:58 +0100, Sérgio Basto
On Qui, 2016-08-25 at 20:58 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Thanks, when is the next push ? , after that I can run my scripts
> again
> and check the remain issues .
Hello ,
Checking again (list it attach), now looks good , we just need properly
retire some packages and check some other packages
On Qui, 2016-08-25 at 16:29 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2016-08-25 6:37 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto :
> >
> > After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches.
> > Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the
> > packages that was removed and
2016-08-25 6:37 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto :
> After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches.
> Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the
> packages that was removed and add to repos, I checked since F16 to F26
> (rawhide), and now I found
2016-08-25 10:14 GMT+02:00 Andrea Musuruane :
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
>> After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches.
>> Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the
>> packages
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches.
> Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the
> packages that was removed and add to repos, I checked since F16 to F26
> (rawhide), and
After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches.
Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the
packages that was removed and add to repos, I checked since F16 to F26
(rawhide), and now I found some issues , see file in attach, we got
some strange results,