Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-25 7:13 GMT+02:00 Ralf Corsepius : > On 08/24/2016 08:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >> >> One suggestion that's been getting more traction on the EPEL side of >> things is >> to just start with versioned packages that can co-exist. So start with >> ffmpeg2.8 and

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-24 20:19 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > On 08/24/2016 11:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2016-08-24 18:55 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : >>> On 08/23/2016 12:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 09:10 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2016-08-25 7:13 GMT+02:00 Ralf Corsepius : On 08/24/2016 08:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: One suggestion that's been getting more traction on the EPEL side of things is to just start with versioned packages that can

Re: review all packages published, retired and added since F16

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches. > Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the > packages that was removed and add to repos, I checked since F16 to F26 > (rawhide), and

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: I don't quite understand the proposition related to ffmpeg. Using version in name doesn't seem to say which one should be chosen by default for link. As you probably know, ffmpeg supports versioned executables, installdirs etc. Building an

Re: review all packages published, retired and added since F16

2016-08-25 10:14 GMT+02:00 Andrea Musuruane : > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches. >> Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the >> packages

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: [...] > > Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol version, if one process has > > dependencies using both version, it will crash. > AFAIU, as long as these packages are properly linked (and

[Bug 4165] Review Request: nvidia-video-codec-sdk - Hardware accelerated video encode and decode

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4165 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 4009] Review request: qmplay2 - A Qt based media player, streamer and downloader

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4009 --- Comment #19 from MartinKG 2016-08-25 16:06:06 CEST --- could somebody please finish the review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 4165] Review Request: nvidia-video-codec-sdk - Hardware accelerated video encode and decode

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4165 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||33 --- Comment

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 02:28 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: [...] Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol version, if one process has dependencies using both version, it will crash.

[Bug 4165] Review Request: nvidia-video-codec-sdk - Hardware accelerated video encode and decode

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4165 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|33 | -- Configure

[Bug 4155] Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4155 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|33 | -- Configure

Re: review all packages published, retired and added since F16

2016-08-25 6:37 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches. > Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the > packages that was removed and add to repos, I checked since F16 to F26 > (rawhide), and now I found

[Bug 3001] Review request: nouveau-firmware - Firwmare files used by the nouveau Linux kernel driver

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3001 --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2016-08-25 16:57:20 CEST --- (In reply to comment #7) > OK, I could try the other approach (used by ArchLinux): > > - include the blob > - include the script > -

[Bug 3001] Review request: nouveau-firmware - Firwmare files used by the nouveau Linux kernel driver

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3001 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-25 22:34 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > As a tangential question - anyone know why the ffmpeg package doesn't use the > %configure macro? Because it's not based on autotools, so lot of expected behavior won't match, produce warning if not errors. -- - Nicolas

[Bug 118] Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118 --- Comment #76 from Sérgio Basto 2016-08-25 22:45:38 CEST --- https://cinelerra-cv.org/ August 6, 2016 Good Guy has constantly improved Cinelerra 5.1 I think I could try version 5.1 which support HD videos etc. --

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 07:39 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/25/2016 02:28 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: >> On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> [...] Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol version, if one

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-25 22:19 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > On 08/25/2016 06:28 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: >> On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> [...] Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol

Re: review all packages published, retired and added since F16

On Qui, 2016-08-25 at 16:29 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-08-25 6:37 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > > > > After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches. > > Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the > > packages that was removed and

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

As a tangential question - anyone know why the ffmpeg package doesn't use the %configure macro? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 02:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-08-24 20:19 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : >> One suggestion that's been getting more traction on the EPEL side of things >> is >> to just start with versioned packages that can co-exist. So start with >> ffmpeg2.8 and

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 06:28 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > [...] >>> Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol version, if one process has >>> dependencies using both version, it will

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 02:30 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-08-25 22:19 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : >> On 08/25/2016 06:28 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: >>> On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

[Bug 3048] Review request: SimpleScreenRecorder - screen recorder to record programs and games

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3048 --- Comment #7 from Sérgio Basto 2016-08-26 02:45:38 CEST --- new release available https://github.com/MaartenBaert/ssr/releases/tag/0.3.6 Do you still want review and add it ? -- Configure bugmail: