http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286
--- Comment #30 from Sérgio Basto ---
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #28)
> As I understand pepper-flash can't be added to rpmfusion by legal and this
> ticket can be closed?
Comment #25 and #26 , I propose moving
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286
--- Comment #31 from Sérgio Basto ---
more instruction for howto build lpf-pepper-flash:
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-users/2016-October/001035.html
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4222
--- Comment #7 from Ben Rosser ---
Belated, but thanks! I was able to build cAudio-freeworld on all branches.
And *nod*, I will request an epel branch once the infrastructure is capable of
building for epel and we've
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293
Bug ID: 4293
Summary: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments
Z80-based graphing calculators
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286
--- Comment #28 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
As I understand pepper-flash can't be added to rpmfusion by legal and this
ticket can be closed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2016-10-12 2:49 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto :
> Hi,
> Nicolas, ask me to bring this discussion to the mailing list .
> Nicolas sorry for the delay , I had a big cold, I'm ok now (it just an
> excuse :) )
>
> OK, all story is in
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260
>
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286
--- Comment #29 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #28)
> As I understand pepper-flash can't be added to rpmfusion by legal and this
> ticket can be closed?
My point is that it cannot be
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4216
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #3 from
On Thursday, 13 October 2016 at 10:01, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
[...]
> (on a side note I would like to have a my ffmpeg-nonfree patches
> reviewed/merged before any backport to f24 - rfbz#4243)
I'll try to take a look at those before the weekend.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora
2016-10-12 16:15 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler :
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> This is not ideal. The ffmpeg 3.0.x branch is not going unmaintained
>> AFAIK. We can't push out a big rebuild of a major library so one, new
>> package can be introduced into F24.
>
> Huh? Upstream
10 matches
Mail list logo