https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #24 from starws vsncn...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 12:12:22 CET ---
New spec file with some minor bugfixes and improvements.
Tested on deadbeef 0.5.1/fedora 16.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
starws vsncn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #733 is|0 |1
obsolete|
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com wrote:
FWIW, I'd love to see this in RPM Fusion and would be willing to review
it. I know there's some history behind the fact that it's not in right
now, but I don't know any of the history, so I don't know if it's still
On 24.11.2011 14:28, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
[...]
Food for though, let's discuss.
You didn't mention the IMHO two most important points. They are
mentioned somewhere in the mailing list archives, but for the sake of
the discussion I'll mention them quickly here:
What influence will shipping
W dniu 24.11.2011 15:01, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
On 24.11.2011 14:28, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
[...]
Food for though, let's discuss.
You didn't mention the IMHO two most important points. They are
mentioned somewhere in the mailing list archives, but for the sake of
the discussion I'll
On 11/24/2011 04:21 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
The more important question is what do we really gain by moving
libdvdcss from livna. It only needs an update every few years it seems,
so does it really matter where it is housed?
Julian
I would be fine with libdvdcss in Livna, but please go
W dniu 24.11.2011 16:28, Xavier Bachelot pisze:
On 11/24/2011 04:21 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
The more important question is what do we really gain by moving
libdvdcss from livna. It only needs an update every few years it seems,
so does it really matter where it is housed?
Julian
I
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #2 from Mattia Meneguzzo hal8...@hotmail.it 2011-11-24 16:38:13
CET ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Have you already been sponsored in Fedora? If so, I don't think you need a
separate RPM Fusion sponsor. If not, I'm not sure how it
Richard Shaw wrote:
Sponsorship can happen on RPM Fusion first, as was the case for me,
but it's not common.
The reason it's not common is that Fedora does not automatically recognize
RPM Fusion sponsorship the way RPM Fusion recognizes Fedora sponsorship, so
you end up having to go through
On 2011/11/24 8:28 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
On 11/24/2011 01:52 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Jonathan Dieterjdie...@lesbg.com wrote:
FWIW, I'd love to see this in RPM Fusion and would be willing to review
it. I know there's some history behind the fact that it's
10 matches
Mail list logo
