On 06/11/2012 06:06 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Brendan Jones wrote:
Hi all
I'm returning to implementing alternatives rather than providing an
upstream patch at this stage.
There is only one binary in this package. The only other files are an
icon, desktop file and a Qt translation. Is it
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2347
--- Comment #5 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com 2012-06-11
15:24:49 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
The proper way to handle alternative libraries is to use ld.so.conf.d, as
used
We want to
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2347
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2012-06-11 15:30:51
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
...
The api in the bundled squish in nvtt is slightly different from the latest
Can you compare the three libsquish API (internal
Hi,
As you may know, the libaacs package from RPM Fusion rely on openssl
functions that have been disabled in the fedora package for some
reason.
This lead the libaacs package to be partially unuseable for it's target usage.
I would like to list what would be possible workarounds for this
issue.
Unless something other than libaacs will use the freeworld package, I
think this is a prime example of why there needs to be exceptions to
the rules :)
I don't know of any formal approval mechanism here, but my vote would
be to allow the bundled/static linking for this and just following the
On 06/11/2012 06:08 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Hi,
As you may know, the libaacs package from RPM Fusion rely on openssl
functions that have been disabled in the fedora package for some
reason.
This is actually libgcrypt, not openssl, but this is the same issue. ECC
is possibly
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/17: 3
nvidia-kmod-295.59-1.fc17
openmotif-2.3.3-3.fc17
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-295.59-1.fc17
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless something other than libaacs will use the freeworld package, I
think this is a prime example of why there needs to be exceptions to
the rules :)
I don't know of any formal approval mechanism here, but my vote
So, I have built my package bombono-dvd. It has been in updates now for
some time (1 month) and I have tested it. Obviously, I want it to
become part of rpmfusion main repo. I dutyfully read the process
description on http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors, but this last piece
seems to be missing
