Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

2012-06-12 Thread Xavier Bachelot
On 06/11/2012 10:56 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: Unless something other than libaacs will use the freeworld package, I think this is a prime example of why there needs to be exceptions to the rules :) I don't know of any

Re: ffmpeg-0.11

2012-06-12 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 27.05.2012 12:46, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2012/5/27 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com: Dear RPM Fusion developers, ffmpeg-0.11 was released a few days ago. Do you think we should try to push it to Fedora 17? I'm not against having it as an update, but: - Is the ABI the same ? -

Re: ffmpeg-0.11

2012-06-12 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 12.06.2012 23:55, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 27.05.2012 12:46, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2012/5/27 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com: Dear RPM Fusion developers, ffmpeg-0.11 was released a few days ago. Do you think we should try to push it to Fedora 17? I'm not against having it

Re: ffmpeg-0.11

2012-06-12 Thread Joseph D. Wagner
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:11:00 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 12.06.2012 23:55, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 27.05.2012 12:46, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2012/5/27 Julian Sikorski : Dear RPM Fusion developers, ffmpeg-0.11 was released a few days ago. Do you think we should try to push it

Re: ffmpeg-0.11

2012-06-12 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 2012-06-13 00:28, Joseph D. Wagner pisze: On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:11:00 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 12.06.2012 23:55, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 27.05.2012 12:46, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2012/5/27 Julian Sikorski : Dear RPM Fusion developers, ffmpeg-0.11 was released a