Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

2013-10-22 Thread Xavier Bachelot
On 10/15/2013 10:13 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: ECC seems to be allowed in Fedora now. I've filled a bug against libgcrypt requesting to enable it : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019126 Once this is done, the libgcrypt-freeworld will become useless. ECC-enabled libgcrypt is now

Re: Appstream data for rpmfusion

2013-10-22 Thread David Timms
On 10/21/2013 11:42 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 11:49 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote: ... http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2013/10/16/how-to-generate-appstream-metadata-for-fedora/ Would rpmfusion be able to provide appstream data? My understanding is that we can best play a part by

[Bug 2997] New: Review Request: spinroot - Formal verification of multi-threaded software applications

2013-10-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2997 Bug #: 2997 Summary: Review Request: spinroot - Formal verification of multi-threaded software applications Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version:

[Bug 2997] Review Request: spinroot - Formal verification of multi-threaded software applications

2013-10-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2997 Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: wl-kmod for F-18

2013-10-22 Thread Nicolas ViƩville
It was just pushed. As it's the latest, please submit a new job, the root cause of this is still unknown It happened again this morning with wl-kmod for F-18. This time it was a mock error. I have a question. If I submit a new job, I'll probably have to change the minor release version

[Bug 2979] Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service

2013-10-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mgans...@alice.de ---

[Bug 2979] Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service

2013-10-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 --- Comment #22 from leigh scott leigh123li...@gmail.com 2013-10-22 16:17:51 CEST --- (In reply to comment #21) a review of steam displays the following messages fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-i386-rpmfusion_nonfree -n steam error: File

[Bug 2979] Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service

2013-10-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 --- Comment #23 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com 2013-10-22 16:26:01 CEST --- Spec URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/steam.spec SRPM URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/steam-1.0.0.43-4.fc19.src.rpm - Added build requirements on

[Bug 2979] Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service

2013-10-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||musur...@gmail.com

[Bug 2979] Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service

2013-10-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 --- Comment #25 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com 2013-10-22 16:30:39 CEST --- (In reply to comment #24) No. To take the review, reviewer should assign the review to himself, remove the block from #2, and block #3:

[Bug 2979] Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service

2013-10-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 --- Comment #26 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de 2013-10-22 20:09:59 CEST --- remove 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' from %install section, it's not longer required. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25install_section --

[Bug 2997] Review Request: spinroot - Formal verification of multi-threaded software applications

2013-10-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2997 --- Comment #2 from Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com 2013-10-22 21:03:48 CEST --- I forgot to upload the .spec file. but I didn't see a 403 error. Strange. NB : source dir is not indexed but spinroot dir is ok. -- Configure

Re: Appstream data for rpmfusion

2013-10-22 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2013/10/22 David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au On 10/21/2013 11:42 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 11:49 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote: ... http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2013/10/16/how-to-generate-appstream-metadata-for-fedora/ Would rpmfusion be able to provide appstream data?

RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2013-10-22

2013-10-22 Thread rpmfusion-pkgs-report
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/19: 5 catalyst-kmod-13.9-2.fc19.3 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.38-1.fc19.5 nvidia-304xx-kmod-304.108-1.fc19.5 nvidia-kmod-325.15-1.fc19.5

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2013-10-22

2013-10-22 Thread rpmfusion-pkgs-report
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/19: 6 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-19-29 fceux-2.2.2-1.fc19 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.58-6.fc19.6 openafs-kmod-1.6.5.1-1.fc19.2

Re: Appstream data for rpmfusion

2013-10-22 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 23:28 +1100, David Timms wrote: My understanding is that we can best play a part by providing upstream with suitable content that can get used, and included in the upstream release tarballs. I guess that is a bit of work, so if there are any helpers who feel like

Re: Appstream data for rpmfusion

2013-10-22 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: I would say that the implementation really must take into accounts third parties vendors, not only one third party repository like us. And not only the vendor ... 2cts If appdata files are provided by upstream, all vendors will be able