Le mardi 22 octobre 2013 à 15:19 +0200, Nicolas Viéville a écrit :
It was just pushed.
As it's the latest, please submit a new job, the root cause of this is
still unknown
It happened again this morning with wl-kmod for F-18. This time it was a
mock error.
I have a question. If I
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
--- Comment #27 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de 2013-10-23 08:32:09 CEST ---
package steam contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
please update-desktop-database in spec file
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
--- Comment #28 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com 2013-10-23 09:57:37
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #27)
package steam contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
please update-desktop-database in spec file
On 10/22/2013 11:27 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:13 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
ECC seems to be allowed in Fedora now.
I've filled a bug against libgcrypt requesting to enable it :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019126
Once this is done, the libgcrypt-freeworld will
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2857
--- Comment #14 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2013-10-23 11:26:30
CEST ---
No answer from Martin Sourada yet, but we need to move forward in order to be
ready for F20 Beta (2013-10-29).
Package CVS request
==
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.orgwrote:
Tested OK and karma given.
A major roadblock has been removed, enjoy :-)
Awesome!
Thanks,
Richard
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |3
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
--- Comment #31 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com 2013-10-23 15:27:17
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #29)
Issues:
[!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
Disabling debuginfo is fine here, but needs a
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
--- Comment #32 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com 2013-10-23 15:31:58
CEST ---
Spec URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/steam.spec
SRPM URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/steam-1.0.0.43-6.fc19.src.rpm
Added all changes except this:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842
Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
Bug 30 depends on bug 2842, which changed state.
Bug 2842 Summary: Review request: openssl-freeworld - Utilities from the
general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
--- Comment #34 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com 2013-10-23 16:02:13
CEST ---
Alec Leamas wrote:
Looks fine. Two more issues:
- In the README.fedora you refer to
http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/flash-plugin/README.txt. This
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 19: 10
ffmpeg-1.2.4-2.fc19
ndiswrapper-kmod-1.58-6.fc19.5
ndiswrapper-kmod-1.58-6.fc19.6
openafs-kmod-1.6.5.1-1.fc19.1
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 19: 11
catalyst-kmod-13.9-2.fc19.2
catalyst-kmod-13.9-2.fc19.3
nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.38-1.fc19.4
nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.38-1.fc19.5
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2909
--- Comment #3 from Alberto bebo.s...@gmail.com 2013-10-23 16:17:09 CEST ---
Hi all,
I wrote again to Gtkradiant ML about the permission errors[1] but the upstream
doesn't want to solve this problem, due to an enormous work in the code, which
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2909
--- Comment #4 from Alberto bebo.s...@gmail.com 2013-10-23 16:20:17 CEST ---
Created attachment 1197
-- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1197
allow the use of gtkradiant in linux
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2857
--- Comment #15 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2013-10-23 18:36:54
CEST ---
I just got an answer from Martin, so here's an updated CVS request, please
discard the one from comment 14.
Please note Martin Sourada (username mso) needs to
Hello,
the Steam review has been taken, however the reviewer wonders if the
infrastructure can cope with i686 binary packages being pushed to the
x86_64 repository. I thought it was possible, but this is my first review
in RPMFusion so I don't know details of the infrastructure.
When installing
Hello,
I would like to merge my current CDRtools package [1] in RPMFusion. It
currently has quite a large user base. It is used by people who needs to
burn Dual Layer DVDs or Blue Ray discs. Currently cdrkit (wodim) is not
able to burn them; actually it never had since its first exception.
I
On 2013-10-23 19:22, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
the Steam review has been taken, however the reviewer wonders if the
infrastructure can cope with i686 binary packages being pushed to the
x86_64 repository. I thought it was possible, but this is my first
review in RPMFusion so I don't know
On 23 October 2013 19:58, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-10-23 19:22, Simone Caronni wrote:
I wonder if the simple answer is just No, you can't . OTOH, isn't it
perfectly viable to install a 32-bit package on a x86_64 host using e. g.,
yum install steam.i386?
It can be
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I would like to merge my current CDRtools package [1] in RPMFusion. It
currently has quite a large user base. It is used by people who needs to
burn Dual Layer DVDs or Blue Ray discs. Currently cdrkit (wodim)
2013/10/23 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com
Hello,
the Steam review has been taken, however the reviewer wonders if the
infrastructure can cope with i686 binary packages being pushed to the
x86_64 repository. I thought it was possible, but this is my first
Hi Simone
From the plague
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
--- Comment #35 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com 2013-10-23 21:34:33
CEST ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Issues:
- Nicholas suggests
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
Depends
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||4
--- Comment #36
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
--- Comment #37 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com 2013-10-23 21:38:55
CEST ---
Latest comments, just for reference...
On 23 October 2013 20:06, Alec Leamas wrote:
Besides that, this discussion draws my attention to all these %{_isa}
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
--- Comment #38 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com 2013-10-23 21:46:39
CEST ---
Thanks for the review!
One question about ExclusiveArch; %{ix86} already contains i686 and if (ever)
Fedora would switch to i786 or anything like that it
On 23 October 2013 20:49, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
From the plague infrastructure perspective there is no issue with having
the i686 package automatically copied into the x86_64 repository. From the
package you will only need to use ExclusiveArch: i686
Quick question. I have
2013/10/23 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com
On 23 October 2013 20:49, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
From the plague infrastructure perspective there is no issue with having
the i686 package automatically copied into the x86_64 repository. From the
package you will only need to
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:39:57 -0500
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I would like to merge my current CDRtools package [1] in RPMFusion. It
currently has quite a large user base. It is used by
On 23 October 2013 22:17, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Susi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
IANAL, but I believe the same reasons that prevent inclusion of
CDRtools into Fedora prevent it from inclusion into RPMFusion. The
program
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.comwrote:
On 23 October 2013 22:17, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Susi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
IANAL, but I believe the same reasons that prevent inclusion of
Once upon a time, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com said:
I would say, possibly. You'd need to make sure it doesn't link to
anything GPL...
I don't think the compiler used is the problem (the output of gcc is not
affected by gcc's license). IIRC the cdrecord problem is that some of
the code is
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 7
NEW gxine-0.5.907-11.fc20 : GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library
k9copy-2.3.8-6.fc20
NEW kaffeine-1.2.2-7.fc20 : KDE media player
NEW
35 matches
Mail list logo
