Hi Xavier , Could you please fix rawhide links in "Browse available
packages"
links for rawhide:
download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything/source/SRPMS/repoview/index.html
we miss the world "Everything/" in URL and we also have links to armhfp .
BTW about wikipage
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3492
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3493
Bug 3493 depends on bug 3491, which changed state.
Bug 3491 Summary: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491
What|Old Value |New Value
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3492
Bug 3492 depends on bug 3491, which changed state.
Bug 3491 Summary: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491
What|Old Value |New Value
On Qua, 2016-07-20 at 17:31 -0300, Mauricio Teixeira wrote:
> > Now it seems that we are back to the normal flow , i.e, we build
> > package in koji, after some days it goes to update-testing (manual
> > push
> > by kwizart) and in 3 day / one week the packages are pushed to
> > updates
> > stable
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Comment #33 from Momcilo Medic 2016-07-20
22:34:01 CEST ---
Updated package with Martin's changes.
Thanks Martin!
Installation RPM:
>
> Now it seems that we are back to the normal flow , i.e, we build
> package in koji, after some days it goes to update-testing (manual push
> by kwizart) and in 3 day / one week the packages are pushed to updates
> stable (also by kwizart) and that was what happen today .
>
Ah, I didn't know
On Qua, 2016-07-20 at 16:22 -0300, Mauricio Teixeira wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have a feeling I might have lost a step on the package contribution
> process.
>
> I've built a package [1], and closed the referenced review bug, but
> the package is still not showing up on the pkgdb or the repository.
>
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335
--- Comment #50 from Joachim Bauch 2016-07-20 22:18:27
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #49)
> You need to verify why it's triggered as a build dependency.
> Try to reproduce with mock.
> Also please keep in mind that we
Guys,
I have a feeling I might have lost a step on the package contribution
process.
I've built a package [1], and closed the referenced review bug, but the
package is still not showing up on the pkgdb or the repository.
What needs to be done to get the package live?
[1]
On 07/19/2016 02:26 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
As I state before, I think, even in this case, x264 asm code, have a
fall back when don't have sse2 instructions and don't crash, that is my
point, but just testing to be sure. I don't see any hardware here to
test it, even though it is a big
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335
--- Comment #49 from Nicolas Chauvet 2016-07-20 10:11:10
CEST ---
You need to verify why it's triggered as a build dependency.
Try to reproduce with mock.
Also please keep in mind that we are using yum instead of dnf to
On 07/20/2016 01:47 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2016-07-20 at 00:37 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2016-07-20 at 00:28 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 at 00:00, Leigh Scott wrote:
Summary of changes:
3dc7333... Change from gtk2 to gtk3 (*)
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33
--- Comment
15 matches
Mail list logo