Il giorno sab, 03/11/2007 alle 18.16 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis ha
scritto:
BTW, did we agree on RPM Fusion or RPMFusion? I think it was RPM
Fusion.
Yes, it was RPM Fusion :-)
Bye,
Andrea.
Il giorno dom, 04/11/2007 alle 15.09 +0100, Julian Sikorski ha scritto:
today I was bored so I packaged bsnes:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
Comments are more than welcome.
I hope you get bored more often ;-)
Bye,
Andrea.
Il giorno sab, 10/11/2007 alle 16.08 -0700, Richi Plana ha scritto:
Well, here's a what-if situation: What if Fedora made a reference to RPM
Fusion's free repositories? According to Tom, if someone asserted
their patents against something in Livna, we would need to take the page
down. If the
Hi!
2008/2/23, Sebastian Vahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is my first package for RPM Fusion (but I'm maintaining several packages
in Fedora [1]). Someone has listed my private repo on the wiki [2] and
finally I've found some time to contribute. :) I'm not sure if I need a
sponsor. But if so
Hi!
2008/3/10, Xavier Lamien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
5. Send your signed CLA, then wait until receive the confirmation.
- just post if no mail is sent to you.
I haven't received any confirmation.
Bye,
Andrea.
Hi,
I can take the following packages:
arcem
* Acorn Achimedes emulator
e-uae
* Amiga Emulator
plus4emu
* Plus4emu is an open source, portable emulator of the Commodore 264
family of computers
psemu-base
* Meta package for base psemu directories, primarily for plugins with
2008/4/25, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
simcoupe
I've passed this by Spot and he has ok-ed it, so we're good to go to move
simcoupe to Fedora. In order to get it legally cleared, the builtin copy of
the
rom had to be placed in an external file, as the rom comes without source
and
thus
2008/5/13 Andre Robatino [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been following the rpmfusion mailing lists for weeks, and except for
mention of Dribble being frozen and talk of Rpmfusion going active in a
few days, I haven't seen anything explaining what people using
Livna/Freshrpms/Dribble will need to
2008/6/7 Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was getting such errors until I regenerated my certificate.
I'd love to give a try, but FAS is off-line. I get an Internal Server Error.
Bye,
Andrea.
2008/6/8 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd love to give a try, but FAS is off-line. I get an Internal Server Error.
FAS's working again. I downloaded a new cert. Now everything seems to
work now :)
Thanks.
Bye,
Andrea.
Hi all,
there are some packages that were orphaned by Ian that still need
a maintainer. They are:
fuse-emulator-roms
gcube
KmPg2
mupen64
mupen64-ricevideo
nes_ntsc
sms_ntsc
snes_ntsc
Nes_ntsc is required to build Nestopia. I have an updated RPM but it
cannot be built until nes_ntsc is in RPM
2008/7/18 David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does the maintainer need to submit a review as normal ?
Does the maintainer need to already be a rpmfusion accepted maintainer {ie
already maintaining packages in fusion} ?
If you are already a Fedora sponsored packager (i.e. you have packages
in
2008/7/20 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Are these still needed/wanted?
Fedora|pine|A commonly used, MIME compliant mail and news
reader.|[EMAIL PROTECTED]||
Fedora|unrar|Utility for extracting, testing and viewing RAR archives| --
none -- ||
I think unrar support should be
2008/8/11 Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Probably I would have done so, if rpmfusion had lifted off officially.
It hasn't. It's still struggling to fill its repositories.
I cannot really understand why you are complaining about somebody else
not having finished a work when you are not
2008/8/11 Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The situation is clear, isn't it? To merge livna+freshrpms+dribble for
fedora 8 and later means that there *must* be an upgrade path for either
one.
So, clearly it needs some sort of feature freeze at livna+freshrpms+dribble
for the following:
2008/8/16 Mario Chacon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
HI!
I want to offer my to help with like a maintainers to some package, I
have never done, but i would like to know how to do it, How can i
help you?...
Please read:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors
Bye,
Andrea.
2008/8/25 David Juran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dan Walsh is implying executable heap really shouldn't be used, see
http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/6117.html?thread=23525 For the reasons
listed there, I'm not sure it's even possible to allow. Could uae be
fixed instead?
I read that. Unluckily
2008/9/3 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
musuruan at gmail.com e-uae
Working on it. SELinux issues.
BTW, even if I solve these, we'll be unable to build it because of
missing BR: libcapsimage-devel.
Bye,
Andrea.
2008/9/5 Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I need to build my akmod for EL-5. Will there be a port of akmods stuff to
EL-5?
Is there a sense in having akmod for EL? AFAIK the EL kernel is ABI
stable. Therefore kmod should be enough.
Bye,
Andrea.
Hi Hans,
2008/8/27 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try java_exec_t, otherwise try making it require an executable stack by
doing:
execstack -s /usr/bin/uae
And combine that with either unconfined_execmem_exec_t or java_exec_t, it
has been a while for me, but in my memory requiring an
2008/9/23 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can manually put nes-ntsc into the private buildsys-repo if needed. That
repo is configured on each of the RPM Fusion builders, but normally empty
and prepared for use-cases like this. But I would prefer to not spend my
time with things like
Hi,
I just tried to import e-uae to nonfree, but I get the following error:
$ ./cvs-import.sh -b devel
/home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/e-uae-0.8.29-0.10.wip4.fc9.src.rpm
Checking out module: 'e-uae'
Unpacking source package: e-uae-0.8.29-0.10.wip4.fc9.src.rpm...
L e-uae-0.8.29-WIP4.tar.bz2
A
2008/10/5 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I just tried to import e-uae to nonfree, but I get the following error:
$ ./cvs-import.sh -b devel
/home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/e-uae-0.8.29-0.10.wip4.fc9.src.rpm
Checking out module: 'e-uae'
Unpacking source package: e-uae-0.8.29-0.10
2008/10/16 Xavier Lamien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
musuruan_[AT]_gmail.com | e-uae | Not found in nonfree-devel
musuruan_[AT]_gmail.com | e-uae | Not found in nonfree-F-8
musuruan_[AT]_gmail.com | e-uae | Not found in nonfree-F-9
- Import problems, being worked on afaik
Status?
Xavier?
should
2008/10/16 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
should be fixed now
Thanks. I'll try later this evening - I have no svn access from where I am.
Import worked :-)
But build failed :-/
There is no libcapsimage-devel for x86_64, ppc and ppc64. But the
first two should be available. Probably
2008/10/16 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
@packages: If your package was in dribble or livna as well as in
freshrpms(¹) then for the sake of the RPM Fusion project and the merge
between those three reps: please go and recheck now that the merge of those
packages that were in multiple
2008/10/27 Denis Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For the record, this is also submitted to Fedora. My original odds for
fuse-zfs making it into Fedora were originally poor, but I recently
upgraded them to good after talking to Simon Phipps (Sun Open Source Chief
Officer). However this may still take
2008/10/27 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also note that Uwe mentioned the Fedora review request in his RPM Fusion
bugzilla review request.
My fault. Sorry, I should have read RPM Fusion BZ and not assuming things.
Therefore you should ask for a review only if the package will be
2008/10/27 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, that is double work for a lot of people (reviews, branch creation,
import, initial builds and some other things ned to be done in both Fedora
and RPM Fusion). Hence I'd say the way Uwe took was the right one -- go to
Fedora, if it looks
2008/10/28 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Though the real fun will begin when upstream bumps it to 0.8.10
(say, after 0.8.F).
We'll be at 16 :) But anyway talking with upstream about changing
their file name scheme is the right thing to do.
Bye,
Andrea.
2008/10/28 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* the wiki could need a lot of love but nobody takes care of it; help
appreciated
I gave the wiki some TLCs today. In particular:
* updated FoundingPrinciples: used present tense and not future, said
that we support kernel module (in kmod2
2008/10/30 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/10/29 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, does anybody want to prepare the two announcement mails for Monday
(more a PR style RPM Fusion launched) and Tuesday (for the fedora-announce
mailing list)?
I'll try to write down something
2008/10/30 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks ok, but I have the feeling it needs a higher advertising rate.
I'm thinking about adding things like: Do you want playback of various
multimedia formats to work painlessly
Are you stuck with an nvidea card and do you want to use 3D?
I
2008/10/30 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks ok, but I have the feeling it needs a higher advertising rate.
I'm thinking about adding things like: Do you want playback of various
multimedia formats to work painlessly
Are you stuck with an nvidea card and do you want to use 3D?
2008/11/1 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
P.S.: Who will actually send out the announcement and where do we send it
besides fedora-announce-list and fedora{-devel,}-list?
I'd say the more the better :)
I thought about:
slashdot.org
linux.com
www.osnews.com
lwn.net
punto-informatico.it (an
2008/11/2 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
thx; I'd say a time somewhere around 14:00 or 15:00 UTC is likely the best
to send it out.
Before sending out the announcement, you should also delete the wiki
page called Configuration and rename ConfigurationNew as
Configuration.
Bye,
Andrea.
2008/11/4 David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I know all that info about don't cross the beams. Is this something we
should provide, obsolete etc when a user has had atrpms and fresh or livna
active ?
Well, I don't think that we should unless the other repository join RPM Fusion.
I cannot think of
Hi,
I've just stumbled upon CentOS Moin Moin theme. I like very much
and I think that is more attractive than the one we currently have.
http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/WikiDesign
I wonder what you think about. If you like it too, I'd like to try to
adapt it to RPM Fusion even though I'm not
2008/11/5 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration
[...cut...]
Note, I didn't do any changes to the wiki, because above maybe might just be
my option. But if it's fine for everybody I'd remove that and create
something else in a different place.
It's fine for
2008/11/9 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I thought we could spread some news there to keep users up2date what
happening in RPM Fusion land; e.g. major new packages (say broadcom-wl),
updates for important packages (amd/nvidia) and things like that.
Do you guys like the idea (we can
2008/11/12 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for the initiative! But I don't know if this is the way forward, a
few of us already have a blog (Me, Xavier, Thorsten, Dominik (iirc)), I
think a blog aggregrator would be better.
I don't agree. The purpose of this initiative is not to post
2008/11/16 Linus Walleij [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I added in a new group for sound emulators (in nonfree F10), put
sidplay in it and took the liberty to also add in uade there.
Isn't Sound and Video a better group for these? I remember that all
the emulators were in a group of their own, now they are
Hi all,
I've noticed that the latest version of plus4emu now ships
copyrighted ROMs in the sources. These ROMs are not installed and the
only place where the user can put them is, as usual, a hidden
directory in his homedir.
I think that we should move plus4emu from free to nonfree because of
2008/11/16 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ship the ROMs in a completely separate package that lives in nonfree? Or is
that to much work or for some other reason not a good idea in general?
Shipping only the ROMs in nonfree would require patching plus4emu to
look for the roms in a
Chris did a amazing work in setting up the news site. It seems it runs
fine and the layout is good and resemble the one the wiki uses.
Can someone please create a DNS entry for news.rpmfusion.org for this
blog? I'll set up a link in the wiki after that. I think that
everything is ready for a
2008/11/25 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
P.S.: I really had hoped someone else would take care of this, but seems
it's one more thing that somehow got onto my (already quite long) todo list
:-/
Maybe we can choose an announce writer. Any volunteer?
Regards,
Andrea.
2008/11/30 David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been working on review of bsnes [1]. One of the issues raised before I
began was the upstream source includes some libraries, some of which are
already packaged and included in either fedora or rpmfusion.
Since I'm not an experienced packager or
2008/12/12 Xavier Lamien laxat...@fedoraproject.org:
I have a lot of things on my todo list already -- due to that and Kwizart
working on it already (
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-October/001589.html
) I tried to completely ignore it ;-)
he he :)
kwizart,
2008/12/13 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
Understood - rpmfusion is not a community-project (important decisions
were made w/o asking community directly).
That is your PoV and it does not reflect, for example, my opinion.
BTW, I've always been a fan of who-does-much-of-the-work is more
2008/12/15 manuel wolfshant wo...@fedoraproject.org:
Sure, let me rephrase:
I would prefer to have a wiki page pointing to other repositories rather
than distributing ourselves unverified packages. I have seen way too many
packages which do not respect our packaging rules.
But we already have
2008/12/15 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net:
On Mon 15-Dec-2008 at 11:50 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
I've noticed that version 2.5.0 of autopano-sift-C has been
released last July. Can you update it in RPM Fusion?
Yes, I even have a .spec for it. I just haven't caught up with the
rpmfusion
2008/12/15 Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info:
I don't think it is a good idea.
You are free to do so. But do you have any other ideas how to get other 3rd
party repos under the RPM Fusion hood to get rid of the repo mess that
confuses users and results in repo mixing problems? Merging
2008/12/15 David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au:
BTW, time is always short, but maybe some kind of FAS integration for
moinmoin would be nice (this is another way to get non-packagers
involved :)
It's mediawiki that fedora uses, and has fas2 auth plugins for from memory,
why does rpmfusion differ
Hi Bruno,
I've noticed that version 2.5.0 of autopano-sift-C has been
released last July. Can you update it in RPM Fusion?
Thanks.
Regards,
Andrea.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:44 AM, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Hrm, at a glance, I'm not seeing anything in the wiki about how one goes
about requesting cvs changes like this, and we don't have cvs flags
available in bz... I vaguely recall seeing other cvs change
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 3:48 AM, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com wrote:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors/CVSRequests
Ah, thank you. Didn't find that linked anywhere when I briefly poked
around earlier. Did it already exist and I just didn't see it, or did it
just get added? Either way, thank
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
I'd say we definitely should do that, which would mean that we EOL RPM
Fusion for F8 now.
I agree.
More info: Livna in the past EOLed support for a Fedora release when that
went EOL -- that worked fine afaics. Does
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously, you should have talked to upstream _prior_ to inventing an
arbitrary soname. Not only is it binary incompatible with other
distributions, it is also incompatible with future releases by upstream.
Just
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
A simple question, I could not find an answer to on RPMFusion's web site:
Who is legitimated to approve RPMFusion package reviews?
* Active RPMFusion contributors/Those with an RPMFusion account?
* All Fedora packages?
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
All Fedora sponsored packagers and RPM Fusion only sponsored packagers.
+1
But who are RPM Fusion sponsors? IMHO only a Fedora sponsor can be an
RPM Fusion sponsor.
+1
I added these details in the wiki.
Bye,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
And some others know the guidelines very well, know just as well that their
packages need fixing to be compliant, but still want them to be available
somewhere until they get around to fixing them. (That's the case of
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl wrote:
We already have a page in the wiki to track third party repositories.
http://rpmfusion.org/FedoraThirdPartyRepos
If all of us contribute a little to track down the maintainers, we
could at least try to contact them,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Many thx for that. Three small details:
You are welcome.
- users in the past could easily see which repos were compatible with RPM
fusion and which not; now that easily lost in the noise; I'm wondering if it
would
Hi all,
it seems to me gcc 4.4 in devel broke desmume:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/2765-desmume-0.9.1-1.fc11/ppc/build.log
I haven't got any problems in building it under F-10 and F-9.
Does anyone knows what is going on? Unluckily I'm not a C++
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone knows what is going on? Unluckily I'm not a C++ developer.
Fix are usually trivials. As explained in fedora-devel (search for gcc44 )
This is a common missing headers problem caused.
Thanks! It worked :)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Andrea, thx for your comments and enhancements. Much appreciated.
You are welcome.
One general remark: I guess we should try to keep the page itself discussion
free once we finish it.
=== Ideas nobody is working
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Sure, but do we have the manpower to mentor someone and will Google think we
have it/accept us as project? I wouldn't do the latter if I would have to
chose; I'd tell us realize your ideas as GSoC project within the
Hi,
I get the following error when trying to build xbill under devel.
I have no problem under F10 and F9.
Bye,
Andrea.
-- Forwarded message --
From: rpmfusion-build...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Date: Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:51 PM
Subject: Build Error (Job 2919): xbill-2_1-2_fc11
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
No, the problem is that you need to use RPM 4.6 on the host system to build
Rawhide packages, see the discussions on the fedora-devel-list.
If the problem is that our build system doesn't yet use RPM 4.6, why
don't we
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Options? (note that I expressed my position above already)
I think that we should do our projects in Fedora GSoC - this would
give us a better visibility.
If this is not possible because Fedora won't welcome our
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Steven Moix steven.m...@axianet.ch wrote:
Hi,
I just made an (in)formal review of
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406 corresponding to all
the points in the Fedora guidelines. I'm currently sponsored as a Fedora
contributor but don't have any
Hi,
I changed the Contributors page in the wiki to explain that it is
reviewer's responsibility to remove the blocker on RF_REVIEW and to
block RF_ACCEPT when he approves a package:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors?action=diffrev2=28rev1=27
The blocker on RF_REVIEW was set at the beginning
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
That was a hickup that was fixed by a requeuing the job. Part of the problem
might have been that the local rawhide tree was updated in the middle of the
build process.
Thanks Thorsten for re-queuing it.
Andrea.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
We haven't discussed how to become a RPM Fusion sponsor yet iirc, but I'd
say we follow the same patter we use in other places as well: If you are a
sponsor in Fedora then you can become a sponsor in RPM Fusion. I'd
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't remember reading a discussion about this. Is there anyone who
made some research about OSSv4? I saw some good reviews and some folks
in fedoraforum are asking about it.
Can it be considered for RPMFusion?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild:
Adding maintainers below.
502 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 snes9x matthias...rpmforge.net
503 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 raine
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
I think we should open bugs in bugzilla
Why open new bugs? The bugs are there already (see Bugs taht are blocking
#501) and IMHO can be used for further discussions (and are the best place
for them IMHO). That's
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote:
On Sun, 3 May 2009 21:53:00 +0200, you wrote:
If you are seeking a sponsor you must also be set to block the
tracker bug: NEEDSPONSORS (bug #30). Thus, some potential sponsors
will look at the NEEDSPONSORS bug to find
Hi all,
I'm going to submit FBZX, a Spectrum emulator, for review in Fedora.
Fedora allows the packaging of Spectrum emulators but it doesn't allow
Spectrum ROMs, even though they are distributable. Therefore I'll have
to remove the ROMs from the tarball as it is currently done by
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Lucian Langaco...@gnome.eu.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 17:45 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to submit FBZX, a Spectrum emulator, for review in Fedora.
I'm interested in this so feel free to cc me when you do. I can help
with review
-- Forwarded message --
From: Colin Watson cjwat...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Date: Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: Spectrum ROMs in RPM Fusion
To: Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com
Cc: RPM Fusion developers discussion list
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
On Sun
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Lucian Langaco...@gnome.eu.org wrote:
Can you please tell me why? I cant see the difference between
fuse-emulator and FBZX.
There is no difference between the two but the current rules forbids it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:SoftwareTypes
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Lucian Langaco...@gnome.eu.org wrote:
I've submitted for review other emulator which didn't require any roms
at that time and it is still not accepted at this time.
It's really clear that no emulator is welcomed in fedora, fuse case (and
perhaps one or two
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:20 PM, solarflow99solarflo...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, I managed to get past this, now there is this error:
# ./cvs-import.sh -b free ../dosemu-1.4.0-3.1905svn.src.rpm
Checking out module: 'dosemu'
ERROR: dosemu/free does not exist!
BTW, I can think of some changes
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:21 AM, solarflow99solarflo...@gmail.com wrote:
hi, I just wondered who I can send corrections about the website to?
It's a wiki, you can correct them yourself.
Bye,
Andrea.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:44 PM, solarflow99solarflo...@gmail.com wrote:
well, I downloaded the plague-client, and created the 3 certs, I see a
variable has to be set to tell it to use them. then im at a loss as what to
do next, where are we supposed to type make build? if only I had an
solarflow99 can you please revert this change in the wiki? Now it is
very unclear that you have to issue a simple command in the branch
directory. Thanks.
-- Forwarded message --
From: RPM Fusion Wiki nore...@rpmfusion.org
Date: Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:54 PM
Subject: [RPM Fusion]
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:01 PM, solarflow99solarflo...@gmail.com wrote:
I just have a question about updating a package in CVS. From the example, I
edit the spec file and it shows to type: make tag build. However this
command fails, and doing make build doesnt seem to take the new spec
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Please don't top-post. You are less likely to get help from list subscribers
if you continue to top-post.
I'm sorry for my previous top-post, but GMail mobile can only
include the previous post at the bottom of the
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Till Maasopensou...@till.name wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:12:40AM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Therefore, to achieve the wanted result you should do something like this:
%if 0%{?fedora} = 12
ExclusiveArch: i686
%endif
%if 0%{?fedora} = 11
Hi,
I've seen that no one has committed Bruno's autopano-sift-C update.
How can we unlock this situation? I don't know who is allowed to
commit this update for him. If it helps, I can be a co-maintainer and
submit this update for him.
Anyway, how can we unlock Bruno impossibility to commit
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
as of 0.051, bsnes is now GPL. This is not the only change, however. It
also now requires an additional library [1] to support compressed ROM
images. The problem is that this library seems (at the first glance)
contain
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
I only had a quick look, and the RAR code is the only problematic one,
but it seems that RAR support can be disabled. Does the fact that the
libsnesreader.so is dlopened and not linked to change anything here?
Yes. It
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:34 PM, solarflow99 solarflo...@gmail.com wrote:
I just have a fairly simple question, i'm trying to use CVS and request a
build in a new branch, and I tried everything:
# cd build/dosemu/F-11
[r...@localhost F-11]# ls
./ ../ branch CVS/ .cvsignore Makefile
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:12 AM, solarflow99 solarflo...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried adding a spec file, and even changing it, and it still fails. I
tried looking at all the examples I could find
Please post the exact operatation you are doing, listing all the
directory you use.
Bye,
Andrea.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, solarflow99 solarflo...@gmail.com wrote:
# ls
./ ../ branch clog CVS/ .cvsignore dosemu.spec Makefile sources
# export CVSROOT=:ext:solarflo...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/free
# export CVS_RSH=ssh
The two lines above are not needed after the first checkout.
Hi all,
a user has reported a segfault in E-UAE under Fedora 11 and an
x86_64 system:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=850
However I do only have Fedora 10 available under my x86_64 system and
I do not experience any problem. Can someone have a look to confirm
it?
Thanks,
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com wrote:
Confirmed. This is all I get from the program on my F11 x86_64
[...]
Do you want me to create a backtrace?
Yes, please.
Thanks!
Andrea.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
0.053 brought yet another code separation, libsnesfilter. Having said
that, in the process of severely crippling snesfilter (only zlib
support), I have managed to make it work with system zlib. Spec files
and srpms are
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
updates-testing is enabled in the configuration of all our builders, so
there is no need to move it afaics.
But note, I'll likely do a stable move soon anyway, so it might get
moved there depending on how old the
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
