Hello,
I just updated to F16 beta. I've installed the rpmfusion repos but
cannot find mpd in here. I can't find kmod-wl either. Could someone
please shed light on when these will be availble?
--
Thanks a bunch,
Regards,
Ankur: FranciscoD
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Hello,
I'd like to co-maintain mpd. Adrian, the current maintainer has agreed
to this. Can someone please point me to the procedure?
PS: kwizart: I didn't exactly understand what you mentioned over the
irc, apologies :)
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1954
--
Thanks,
Regards,
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 23:06 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2011/10/11 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I just updated to F16 beta. I've installed the rpmfusion repos but
cannot find mpd in here. I can't find kmod-wl either. Could someone
please shed light on when
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 13:47 +0100, Chris Nolan wrote:
I can no longer maintain wl-kmod or broadcom-wl either.
After 4 years of Fedora I am bored of having to upgrade every 13
months
so I jumped ship to Arch.
Any takers? Is there some process I need to go through to officially
orphan
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 10:35 +0200, Nicolas Viéville wrote:
Hello Nicolas,
snippy
Hi Nicolas,
I'm sorry I've been a little aloof these couple of days. I was going
through wl-kmod last night when I came across this post.
If you need any assistance with the spec etc, please feel free to ping
me
Hello,
I've noticed that the steps around dracut usage have been removed from
the Nvidia guide here[1]. Why is this? Are they not needed anymore?
Quite a few folks have come into #fedora and have had their borked X
fixed after running the dracut commands. Can these please be added back
to the
Hi folks,
I was wondering if it's worth packaging up the Intersense library[1] to
make it available for Fedora? Intersense makes sensors and chips for
motion tracking. I've recently started working with NavChip[2]. It's how
I ran into the library. Navigation systems are an important research
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 20:35 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I didn't see the source anywhere. Unless they over the sources (and
it's FOSS) then it's a non-starter...
Yeah. That's what I thought too. I'll see if I can get the source code
some place. If I can't, I'll set up a private repository I
Hi folks,
I found this post[1] that tells one how to enable the Dbus interface for
vlc so that it can be controlled via MPRIS2. However, in the vlc that I
installed from RPMFusion on F18, I can't find the option to enable this
as the post describes. Here are the vlc packages I have installed. Am
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 14:21 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Hi,
From a quick look at config.log, it seems that this test fails:
configure:45676: checking for MCE
configure:45683: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors dbus-1 mce
There is no pkgconfig/mce.pc in f17 at least, so this feature might
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 14:21 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Patch is welcomed if you find something is missing.
Thx
From the looks of it, the interface setting's been removed completely[1]
$ vlc --control dbus
seems to work just fine. May be that's the intended usage.
[1]
Hi folks,
I recently realized that the opencv module in Fedora doesn't contain the
nonfree parts, which are the SURF and SIFT feature detectors. I was
wondering if it's OK to make them available via RPMFusion? Both SIFT and
SURF are widely used feature detectors in vision research. Not having
Hi Hans, Alec,
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Note that we would prefer for opencv-nonfree to just contain a couple
of plugins, or some such, and depend on the Fedora package. If that is
not possible it is allowed to simply copy the Fedora package as base,
add the
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 16:55 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Hi,
Please note that despite the shared object is named opencv_nonfree.so,
this library will belong to the RPM Fusion free section.
We used to use the opencv-freeworld as the package name in this case.
(instead of opencv-free).
Hi,
Please forgive me if this is a known issue:
[asinha@ankur ~]$ sudo yum install mpd --skip-broken
[sudo] password for asinha:
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package mpd.x86_64 1:0.17.3-3.fc20 will be installed
--
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 05:34 +1000, David Timms wrote:
How about using a released version aka fedora 19 ?
Excuse me? Is installing an alpha release to help with testing a bad
thing nowadays?
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora!
Hi Sergio,
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 18:29 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Builder as stopped (20 of Aug), so we can't fix it (soon) ... :(
Ah! Yikes! :/
I could use mock to build myself newer packages, though, right? Would
you know what packages need to be rebuilt to fix this issue until the
builder
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 10:53 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Ah! Yikes! :/
Known issue:
http://bugs.musicpd.org/view.php?id=3814#bugnotes
I'll see if I can get it to build off git.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 22:53 +1000, David Timms wrote:
Check for an existing 'upgrade the package/broken dependency/ffmpeg
/fail to build from source etc' bug first, and if it doesn't already
exist, you can create a new bug.
Do not attach SRPM to the bug. Attach a diff -u from the original
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 18:17 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
we need compile new gpac 0.5.0 package against new ffmpeg , but
doesn't
build due a problem in a define [1] that I don't understand if a gcc
incompatibility or what .
Is gpac a requirement for mpd? Doesn't look like it. I just checked
Hi Ken,
I just looked at your email on your cvs2git script. Considering that
Fedora did the same a few releases ago, would it be worth asking releng
how they went about it?
I found Jesse's post here[1], which says they used the cvs2git tool from
cvs2svn[2].
I'm not aware of the work that has
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 21:06 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
mpd
Like I said earlier, I'll have to update this to a git snapshot to get
it to work with the new ffmpeg version. 0.17.5 doesn't work with it. I
have a spec ready. I'll update it whenever I have cycles.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 14:39 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I'll update it whenever I have cycles.
I successfully built mpd for devel. It's a git snapshot of 0.18 since
the 0.17 branch doesn't work with the new ffmpeg at all.
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/18534
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:54 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
The root cause of the failure was not specifically related to plague
and could have appeared with koji. But that's not a reason not to
continue to work on the transition to git/koji. So I still hope to
have this transition before f20.
Hi,
I just read this on the planet:
http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2013/10/16/how-to-generate-appstream-metadata-for-fedora/
Would rpmfusion be able to provide appstream data?
(I'm trying out the process on my machine now to see how it works.)
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 11:49 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi,
I just read this on the planet:
http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2013/10/16/how-to-generate-appstream-metadata-for-fedora/
Would rpmfusion be able to provide appstream data?
(I'm trying out the process on my machine now to see how
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 23:28 +1100, David Timms wrote:
My understanding is that we can best play a part by providing upstream
with suitable content that can get used, and included in the upstream
release tarballs.
I guess that is a bit of work, so if there are any helpers who feel
like
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
I would say that the implementation really must take into accounts
third parties vendors, not only one third party repository like us.
And not only the vendor ... 2cts
If appdata files are provided by upstream, all vendors will be able
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 02:42 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I wrote:
I'm going to complain about this to FPC, and if they ignore the
issue,
escalate it to FESCo. This kind of package has no business being in
Fedora!
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/362
Thank you for filing the ticket,
Forwarded Message
From: Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora
de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Copr
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:54:40 +0100
Dear developers and Fedora contributors,
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 12:12 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
To handle this, my simple proposal is that we handles packaged yum
repositories like this:
- It's ok to package yum repositories listed in [4].
- If anyone wants to change the list in [4] this should be announced
here on rpmfusion-devel,
Hi,
I had brought up the subject of appdata for rpmfusion packages a couple
of months ago. With F21 coming up fast, it'll be good to make some
headway in this regard. A bug is already filed here[1].
Could rpmfusion package maintainers please give their suggestions there?
Like I've said in the
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 11:34 +0300, Nikos Roussos wrote:
+1. I think it's really frustrating for end users that they can't
currently find RPMfusion applications through Software Center (which
is
the default and only preinstalled application for installing new
software).
+1
The fedora
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 18:27 +0300, Nikos Roussos wrote:
Elad's proposal is about deciding if we want RPMFusion packages to be
accessible to Desktop Fedora users or not. It's that simple.
Bringing the thread back to topic. Questions that need answering:
0. Do we want to ship appdata for
On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 02:07 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
2. Who will generate the metadata and where?
3. How will the metadata be packaged to ship in the repositories?
I did a trial run today. Interested folks can see the results on the bug
here:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Hi,
Probably a known issue, but I couldn't find much info on it. I get this
error when I try to play a video in VLC:
- VLC does not support the audio or video format h264
Not really sure what's causing it. I have the x264 packages installed.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 13:37 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
- VLC does not support the audio or video format h264
Running it from the terminal gives me this:
[0x1800118] main libvlc: Running vlc with the default interface. Use
'cvlc' to use vlc without interface.
[0x7fcf24c1ddf8] main decoder error
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 11:04 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I've removed and reinstalled vlc and related packages and also deleted
any vlc configuration in the home directory but there still isn't any
change. VLC plays the audio, but not the video of the file.
Something is off here. I can't play
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 02:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
my vm for tests is an Fedora 21, so I'm saying that is working here in
a
Fedora 21 .
/me scratches head.
What else do you think we can do to debug this? If you come on IRC
sometime, please drop me a ping and we could maybe look at this?
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 11:55 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Something is off here. I can't play webM either. Even totem plays the
file just fine:
This is what I get when I run it with -vvv:
0x7fd4c0008ac8] main input debug: Buffering 0%
[0x7fd4d4003b38] mkv demux debug: Starting the UI Hook
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 10:39 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes, this seems to be the same problem as with running calibre on
f21 / rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124987
Esp see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124987#c15
You could try this glibc
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 19:12 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I'll file a new bug and reference the calibre bug as you suggest.
Bug filed here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133843
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 10:06 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
xine-lib passed a local rebuild and is now building in plague.
Hi,
I get this at the moment:
Error: package mpd-1:0.18.11-2.fc21.x86_64 requires
libavcodec.so.55()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed.
package
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 14:29 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
mplayer
I'm still seeing this on my F21 up to date system:
Error: nothing provides libavutil.so.54()(64bit) needed by
mplayer-1.1-28.20140919svn.fc21.x86_64. nothing provides
libavutil.so.54()(64bit) needed by
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 19:23 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
t is related. Try doing
# yum downgrade ffmpeg\*
I only have 2.3.3 here:
[asinha@localhost 99_Current_papers]$ rpm -qa \*ffmpeg\*
ffmpeg-libs-2.3.3-3.fc21.x86_64
gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.13-13.fc21.x86_64
ffmpeg-2.3.3-3.fc21.x86_64
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 01:53 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi Ankur Sinha
On Dom, 2015-04-26 at 19:51 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2015-04-26 at 10:27 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 09:25 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Sure. I'll send you a patch on the rpmfusion-devel
# repo = nonfree-fedora-22 arch = x86_64 error: invalid repo or arch
# following repositories are available:
...
Erm, not relevant to the thread, but that's known. The nonfree part
hasn't been pushed yet.
Anyway, no comments about appdata then?
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha FranciscoD
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:24 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Erm, not relevant to the thread, but that's known. The nonfree part
hasn't been pushed yet.
Anyway, no comments about appdata then?
Yikes, sorry, wrong thread - low on coffee :/
But yea, non free is still a WIP.
--
Thanks,
Regards
and add an
extra package that the release rpms can pull in. I'm more than happy
to generate the appdata and maintain this package until it can be
automated.
What do you folks think?
[1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2998
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha FranciscoD
http
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 14:33 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
There's no RPMFusion for F22 or rawhide yet.
That's what I'd thought. What are the packages at the URL though?
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha FranciscoD
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
)
perl-Carp-1.36-1.fc21.noarch (no replacement) requires
4:perl-5.18.4-306.fc21.x86_64 (replaced by 4:perl-5.20.2-321.fc22.x86_64)
Some of these packages are from RPMFusion - Do these packages need
rebuilds?
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha FranciscoD
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 21:48 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 20:10 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Anyone?
So, I went ahead and added appdata files for all the rpmfusion packages
that can show up in gnome-software - gui applications that have icons,
basically. The appdata files
the package for devel and F22, can you please
include the appdata file in the package too?
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sanjayankur31/rpmfusion
-appdata/master/appdata-extra-free/desktop/k9copy.appdata.xml
Of course, please feel free to improve it.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha FranciscoD
http
:
http://keys.fedoraproject.org/pks/lookup?search=0xA6708DA3op=vindex
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha FranciscoD
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the appdata files by myself - maintainers would probably
already have accounts and could do it, hopefully :)
Having said that, a number of RPMFusion packages do not have an active
upstream, so for them, the appdata will just have to be carried in the
srpm.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha
-reloaded.sourceforge.net/#Overview
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha FranciscoD
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 20:10 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Anyone?
A temporary repository with appdata files is here:
https://github.com/sanjayankur31/rpmfusion-appdata
I've started adding files to it and will update the rpms when I've done
a few. Please feel free to open pull requests if you'd
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:28 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I've generated and submitted appdata for both repositories here:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3658 ;- nonfree
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 ;- free
I'll be happy to swap reviews to try and get
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 11:16 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
What do you folks think?
Hello,
I've generated and submitted appdata for both repositories here:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3658 - nonfree
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 - free
I'll be happy
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:28 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I'll be happy to swap reviews to try and get these in the repos
before
the F22 release.
Just a note - very few packages have appdata right now. Some of them
have appdata files upstream and should receive them with the next
update
remember seeing messages.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha FranciscoD
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 08:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> This is great news! I wish I had both the time and expertise to have
> been more helpful so thank you very much for your efforts!
+1
Thanks, Nicholas.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedora
sion.org/cgit/free/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.gi
> t/
> https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-d
> ata.git/
I've closed these now.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
egards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
nd then we can get
rid of the wiki page etc?
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
rpmfusion-developers mail
e
please check and let us know if this works?
If it does (as it should), we won't need the wiki page and the other
workarounds.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 14:40 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Please contact the author of this page FrancisoD
Is that page also protected? I was hoping anyone could edit it rather
than waiting for me. :/
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Us
ges) and things
would "just work".
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list
try to fix as many as we can before regenerating the appdata.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4915
Also, if you have some free cycles, please feel free to poke around
these bugs and see if you can fix them. More hands are always welcome!
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "Franc
seen any changes to GitHub that would require it. We all have
copies of our code, and if we do get to a point where things change at
GitHub, we can always move to GitLab/Bitbucket/Pagure. I personally
don't think it's required just yet.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "Fran
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 17:51:50 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2018-07-16 23:52 GMT+02:00 Ankur Sinha :
> >> ???
> >> It's the rhbz instance. Please try with our own instance!
> >
> > Well, I would, but I can't find a single fedmsg notification about an
> >
Resending without the image attachment (message held for moderation)
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 11:06:51 -0700, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 09:18:28 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 2018-07-15 23:59 GMT+02:00 Ankur Sinha :
> > Are you able to run a new-hotness instance loc
> ???
> It's the rhbz instance. Please try with our own instance!
Well, I would, but I can't find a single fedmsg notification about an
update to the rpmfusion packages from datagrepper.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
e not using "resources from Fedora", and I expect it
will not be a problem.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rpmfusion-
] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4897
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 09:33:51 -0700, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I'll ask the infra team if they can find me an rpmfusion related anitya
> notification to test with when I'm back home in ~10 days, if no one has
> done it by then.
Filed: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7121
-
it to #rpmfusion?
[1] t.me/rpmfusion_team
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpm
for your work for this release! and congrats to all.
Thanks for all your work Nicolas. Have a good holiday!
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
would be best if it were picked up by the same person also
> picking up qt5-qtwebengine in Fedora.
Thanks for all your work on the package, Kevin, both here and in Fedora.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Euro
doraproject.org/c/community/contributing-to-fedora
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha
https://ankursinha.in
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
T
uninstallable packages)
Would this be a known issue please, and is there a fix/workaround we can
help test?
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 09:01:54 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Would this be a known issue please, and is there a fix/workaround we can
> > help test?
>
> It is known: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5384 –
> qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 08:33:24 -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> File a bug report so the maintainer sees it!
OK! (5x more exclaiming XD)
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5773
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedorapro
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtwebengine/commits/master
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
From fc9f2762cdbc8e131751dcd13ace66edc54c13ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: &q
,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To u
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 10:37:13 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I hope you're all well.
>
> I am planning to regenerate the appstream data and push updates to all
> release soon. Could you please let me know if there are any new
> packages/builds that I should wai
On Mon, May 09, 2022 12:15:51 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I happily announce that RPM Fusion Fedora 36 is General Available (GA).
>
> Thank you all that make it happen .
Thanks everyone
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
Hi folks,
No -freeworld package is required for qt6-qtwebengine. Neal said:
"
No freeworld package is needed for qt6-qtwebengine. It is linked
against Fedora's system ffmpeg and will gracefully upgrade when
libavcodec-freeworld is installed.
"
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "
with the rebuilds etc., but I don't know
enough about Qt development to do the initial packaging.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP
uld be able to use the fedora version unmodified and just
> switch codecs (swap ffmpeg-libs).
>
> But you need to confirm with the qt6/kde maintainers.
Cool, I'll go check with them to see what needs to be done here.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / H
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 19:28:57 +0200, Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Ankur Sinha via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > I'm not really sure. How would one test this? (Things like Netflix seem
> > to work fine here for me)
>
> Netflix works for you?! I would hav
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 12:56:04 +0200, Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Ankur Sinha via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > No freeworld package is needed for qt6-qtwebengine. It is linked
> > against Fedora's system ffmpeg and will gracefully upgrade when
now---someone more knowledgeable will have to tell us.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rpmfu
quite understand this---shouldn't koji and mock do the same
thing?
Anyway, sorry about that. I'll remember to check koji in the future to
confirm.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
sig
,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpm
95 matches
Mail list logo
