unifi maintainership

Just a heads up guys but I upgraded to a UDM Pro SE recently so I'm no longer running the network application on a PC. I can maintain it for now assuming any issues I run into on ARM are the same as x86_64 but if there's someone who would like to maintain the unifi package I am willing to turn

scm issues?

I'm trying to do a pull on nonfree/unifi in master and it took about 3 minutes to complete. Thanks, Richard ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Stuck PPC build?

I'm working on updating unifi but the f39 package seems to be stuck building: https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=614375 I decided to try and cancel it so I could restart the build before submitting a ticket but that's not working for me either: $ koji-rpmfusion cancel 614375

aarch64 builders down?

I didn't see an open ticket[1] but wanted to ask here first as my unifi build[2] has been stuck for a while. Thanks, Richard [1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/buglist.cgi?component=Build%20System_id=22725=Infrastructure=--- [2] https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=610157

Re: pianobar has moved to Fedora

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 4:11 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via rpmfusion-developers wrote: > > > I also just checked and it is setup on release monitoring but for some > > reason it's saying the latest version is really the oldest... > > > > https://release-monitoring.org/project/320447/ > >

Re: pianobar has moved to Fedora

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 1:09 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via rpmfusion-developers wrote: > Hello all, > > I've just approved pianobar for inclusion in Fedora. Existing maintainer > hobbes1069 was added to the Fedora package ACL. Let me know if anyone > else wants to be added to maintainer

Re: Several multimedia packages moved to Fedora

I know Leigh is not interested in Fedora packaging for whatever reason. Feel free to add me to the Openshot packages once approved. If I have a chance I'll see if I can work in the reviews. Can you reply with the BZs? Thanks, Richard ___

Re: rfpkg scratch-build expected to work?

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 10:18 AM Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers < rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:34 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion- > developers wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:29 PM Sérgio Basto > > wrote:

Re: rfpkg scratch-build expected to work?

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:29 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 23:25 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion- > developers wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion- > > developers wrote: > > > I tried a scratch build on RPM

rfpkg scratch-build expected to work?

I tried a scratch build on RPM Fusion which I haven't done in some time and was greeted with the following: $ rfpkg scratch-build --srpm setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1673913600 Wrote: /home/build/rpmfusion-scm/nonfree/unifi/unifi-7.3.81-1.el8.src.rpm [] 100%