ork? And what's the line with "GBM window" mean?
--
Tomasz Torcz “(…) today's high-end is tomorrow's embedded processor.”
to...@pipebreaker.pl — Mitchell Blank on LKML
___
rpmfusion-developers
ay forward.
>
> See also https://twitter.com/rpmfusion_team/status/1641336945866309634
Were the codecs only difference? What about video-decode acceleration (libva)?
--
Tomasz Torcz 72->|
citation, let's continue: there's
allegely new open-source GPU driver coming. The vendor is undisclosed at
the moment, but it may be NVIDIA:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Big-New-Driver-Coming
--
Tomasz Torcz “If you try to upissue this patchset I
Dnia Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:09:08PM +0100, Sérgio Basto napisał(a):
> On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 14:20 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > Dnia Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:31:48AM +0100, Sérgio Basto napisał(a):
> > > On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 12:22 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-
>
ient you are talking about? Fractal has a spell check, Weechat
too.
(Quaternion, gomuks, nheko on other hand has not).
If we decide to move out of freenode, we should decide if sticking
with IRC is worth. Nothing beats irssi, but nowadays I would prefer
new channels to be created on Matrix netwo
dency on the binary. Then it wouldn't
> matter which package provides it, i.e.:
> Requires: %{_bindir}/xdpyinfo
This may also be a time to revisit those dependencies. "grep" shows no
mention of "xdpyinfo" in currenct Kodi source tree.
--
Tomasz Torcz
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 07:45:52AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I can't get to koji or bugzilla. Is it just me?
Both work for me. I'm in Europe, network AS56324.
--
Tomasz TorczTo co nierealne – tutaj jest normalne.
to...@pipebreaker.pl Zio
of vapoursynth.
According to the bug, it was enabled for mpv features. Yet mpv's
page warns against using vapoursynth (actual words are "Do not use this
filter").
I would vote for disabling vapoursynth in f32, until Kodi works with
python3. This is mpv-vs-Kodi situation, but I'm
this as
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5688
Should be probably reopened.
--
Tomasz TorczTo co nierealne – tutaj jest normalne.
to...@pipebreaker.pl Ziomale na życie mają tu patenty specjalne.
___
rpmfusio
posting to rpmfusion-users would do.
For Fedora releases, there is a common bugs page
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs/Common), which is linked in release
announcment. Users read this page before upgrading to decide if there is
something impacting them. We don't have equivalent for
cember this year. Let's hope it's enough time to get plugins
ported from dead python version to py3.
--
Tomasz TorczOnce you've read the dictionary,
to...@pipebreaker.plevery other book is just a remix.
_
still in the process of evaluating other codecs.
Christian
___
devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- End forwarded message -
--
Tomasz TorczOnly
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 04:12:33PM +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2016-12-11 14:21 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Detiste :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to update my package, by rfpkg is giving the same error for all
> > actions.
> >
> > $ rfpkg push
> > Could not execute push: __init__() got an unexpected ke
to be available in Flatpak. Do we need it in RPM?
--
Tomasz TorczThere exists no separation between gods and men:
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl one blends softly casual into the other.
rebuild is not required for every Fedora release.
--
Tomasz Torcz "God, root, what's the difference?"
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl "God is more forgiving."
os (if not already enabled) and please purge yum/dnf caches
> for yum with:
> yum clean all
>
> for dnf :
> dnf clean all
By the way, is there an ETA for releases for F23 and rawhide (F24)?
--
Tomasz Torcz"Funeral in the morning, IDE hacki
-free
17 k
Transaction Summary
==
Install 1 Package
Total download size: 17 k
Installed size: 13 k
Is this ok [y/N]:
--
Tomasz TorczOnly gods can safely risk perfection,
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl it's a dangerous thing for a man. -- Alia
quires new
review. This is a job for new maintainer, not for me.
Fedora 22 branch is in 3 weeks (10th of February), so it's good
time to orphan motion.
I'd like to thank all bugreporters, whose reports helped to make
motion package a bit more bearable.
--
Tomasz Torcz
enabling Bitcoin one is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021898
But it is stalled. I've sent a query to fedora-legal list, but it got
stuck in moderation queue.
--
Tomasz Torcz "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2013/7/10 Tomasz Torcz
>
> > Author: ttorcz
> >
> > ...
> * Wed Jul 10 2013 Tomasz Torcz -
> 3.3.0-trunkREV557.8
>
> > - correct typo in logrotate patch
> > - rebuild hoping that ffm
/gambatte/
>
> So, I ask you what version should the RPM have? 537 seems a bit odd for me.
Single-number versions are fine. Some important Linux components (systemd,
kmod) already does that. Just make sure the number never goes back.
--
Tomasz Torcz ,,If you try to u
ng a new ffmpeg
> build:
>
> repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rpmfusion-{non,}free-rawhide
> --whatrequires --source `repoquery --provides --disablerepo=*
> --enablerepo=rpmfusion-free-rawhide ffmpeg-libs` | sort | uniq | sed
> 's/-[^-]*-[^-]*\.[^.]*\.[^.]*$//'
Doe
22 matches
Mail list logo
