http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #42
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #37 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-31 12:46:11
---
(In reply to comment #36)
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-5.20081218.fc9.src.rpm
Not found.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #40 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2009-01-01 00:13:36 ---
(In reply to comment #39)
[-] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
Use an %{alphatag} beginning with the date in
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #34 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-31 06:32:27 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
Changelog:
- removed ugly configure hack in %%install
A much needed improvement. You must report upstream that there is no clean
way
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #32 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-29 16:15:28
---
Created an attachment (id=65)
-- (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=65)
Improved spec file
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #33 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-29 16:20:27
---
I've improved your spec file. It is attached to this bug report. Please, let me
know what you think.
Changelog:
- removed ugly configure hack in %%install
A
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #31 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-26 07:03:48 ---
(In reply to comment #30)
It seems to me that the problem is that configure looks for the library in
/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib64/ and not in /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib/.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #30 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-23 10:56:33
---
(In reply to comment #29)
Looks like x86_64 issue ? I'll try to mock and get a x86_64 going.
It seems to me that the problem is that configure looks for the
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #24 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-22 14:31:46 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
I still cannot build on F10/x86_64.
* ...it does not build at least under F9/i386.
Is that a different machine ?
Do you think this will be
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #26 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-22 19:14:06
---
(In reply to comment #24)
(can you rpm -qa qt3\* |sort for me ?)
$ rpm -qa qt3\* |sort
qt3-3.3.8b-17.fc10.x86_64
qt3-devel-3.3.8b-17.fc10.x86_64
--
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #27 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-22 19:33:38
---
Problem is that both libqt and libqt-mt are not found. On my system I have
libqt-mt but not the former with the BR you require.
$ locate libqt
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #28 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2008-12-22 20:08:03
---
There's no libqt.so in Fedora, it's the obsolete build of Qt with thread
support disabled, nothing should try to link that version. qt-mt is what should
be
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #29 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-22 22:34:01 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
There's no libqt.so in Fedora, it's the obsolete build of Qt with thread
support disabled, nothing should try to link that version. qt-mt
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #23 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-21 16:10:41
---
I still cannot build on F10/x86_64. I get the following error when running
configure:
[...]
checking for getpagesize... yes
checking for working mmap... yes
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #20 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-20 14:31:50 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Ping me for reviewing it :)
updated spec:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec
srpm:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #21 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-21 03:50:49 ---
updated spec:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec
srpm:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-0.12.20081218.fc9.src.rpm
- fix
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #22 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-21 05:01:23 ---
updated spec:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec
srpm:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-0.13.20081218.fc9.src.rpm
- remove
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #16 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-16 14:16:07 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
this would not be required if the package would own that directory ... ;-)
But I can't do that, can I, since on a real system that package
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #18 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-16 14:33:08
---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
this would not be required if the package would own that directory ... ;-)
But I can't do that, can I,
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|musur...@gmail.com |
--- Comment #14
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #15 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com 2008-12-15 17:56:38 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
* Missing Requires: hicolor-icon-theme. This is required because
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/ directories are owned by this package.
this
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #10 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-25 15:39:27 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Just a slight addition, a name change for qt between f8 f9
qt in f9 is == qt4 in f8 hence somthing like this should do the trick:
I was
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #9 from dexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-24 15:28:59 ---
Just a slight addition, a name change for qt between f8 f9
qt in f9 is == qt4 in f8 hence somthing like this should do the trick:
%if 0%{fedora} 8
Buildrequires qt3-devel
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #6 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 16:42:20 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
- del BuildRequires gettext desktop-file-utils since they aren't required.
You are using desktop-file-install in
28 matches
Mail list logo
