Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On Thursday, 01 September 2016 at 19:21, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 08/31/2016 07:11 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Orion Poplawski, I'd like have an agreement on how put ffmpeg in epel7. > > What you say ? may we have one ffmpeg ? , should we have multi ffmpegs > > ? etc. > > So would I. But I

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/31/2016 07:11 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Orion Poplawski, I'd like have an agreement on how put ffmpeg in epel7. > What you say ? may we have one ffmpeg ? , should we have multi ffmpegs > ? etc. So would I. But I seem to have offended Nicolas enough that discussion has stopped. I think

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

Hi,  Today I realized that ffmpeg-compat is not required by any package [1], perhaps we may drop it (I still in review some packages that are lost on migration for new infra (like subtitleripper)) . Orion Poplawski, I'd like have an agreement on how put ffmpeg in epel7. What you say ? may we

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On Sex, 2016-08-26 at 13:25 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 08/26/2016 01:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > > 2016-08-26 0:23 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > > > > > > On 08/25/2016 02:30 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > > > > > > 2016-08-25 22:19 GMT+02:00 Orion

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

epository Size > > Installing: > ffmpeg3.1 x86_64 3.1.2-1.el7 ffmpeg 1.4 M > Installing for dependencies: > ffmpeg3.1-libavdevice x86_64 3.1.2-1.el7 ffmpeg 82 k > ffmpeg3.1-libs x86_64

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/26/2016 01:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-08-26 0:23 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : >> On 08/25/2016 02:30 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> 2016-08-25 22:19 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : On 08/25/2016 06:28 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>>>> 2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com>: >>>>>> Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for >>>>>> preferring anything other than the current ffmp

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On Sex, 2016-08-26 at 13:11 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 26 August 2016 at 09:35, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > [...] > > > > You are still in the "How not to make conflicts" question whereas > > this > > question is out of interest over "which version to choose for a > >

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On Friday, 26 August 2016 at 13:11, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: [...] > The oldest FFmpeg branch currently listed on the download page > is 2.5.x, which was branched in December 2014 and last updated > in February 2016. The last major ABI bump was between 2.8 and 3.0. > > I do think

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On Friday, 26 August 2016 at 09:35, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: [...] > You are still in the "How not to make conflicts" question whereas this > question is out of interest over "which version to choose for a > general usage." > You are still in the false premise that you can have any versions as >

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-26 0:23 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > On 08/25/2016 02:30 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2016-08-25 22:19 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : >>> On 08/25/2016 06:28 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 02:30 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-08-25 22:19 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : >> On 08/25/2016 06:28 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: >>> On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-25 22:34 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > As a tangential question - anyone know why the ffmpeg package doesn't use the > %configure macro? Because it's not based on autotools, so lot of expected behavior won't match, produce warning if not errors. -- - Nicolas

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

As a tangential question - anyone know why the ffmpeg package doesn't use the %configure macro? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-25 22:19 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > On 08/25/2016 06:28 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: >> On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> [...] Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 02:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-08-24 20:19 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : >> One suggestion that's been getting more traction on the EPEL side of things >> is >> to just start with versioned packages that can co-exist. So start with >> ffmpeg2.8 and

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 06:28 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > [...] >>> Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol version, if one process has >>> dependencies using both version, it will

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 07:39 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/25/2016 02:28 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: >> On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> [...] Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol version, if one

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 02:28 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: [...] Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol version, if one process has dependencies using both version, it will crash.

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: [...] > > Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol version, if one process has > > dependencies using both version, it will crash. > AFAIU, as long as these packages are properly linked (and

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: I don't quite understand the proposition related to ffmpeg. Using version in name doesn't seem to say which one should be chosen by default for link. As you probably know, ffmpeg supports versioned executables, installdirs etc. Building an

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/25/2016 09:10 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2016-08-25 7:13 GMT+02:00 Ralf Corsepius : On 08/24/2016 08:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: One suggestion that's been getting more traction on the EPEL side of things is to just start with versioned packages that can

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com>: >>>>> Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for >>>>> preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does >>>>> ffmpeg >>>>>

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-25 7:13 GMT+02:00 Ralf Corsepius : > On 08/24/2016 08:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >> >> One suggestion that's been getting more traction on the EPEL side of >> things is >> to just start with versioned packages that can co-exist. So start with >> ffmpeg2.8 and

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/24/2016 08:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: One suggestion that's been getting more traction on the EPEL side of things is to just start with versioned packages that can co-exist. So start with ffmpeg2.8 and ffmpeg3.0 from the start. I would suggest to extend this approach to Fedora-24,

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for >>>> preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does >>>> ffmpeg >>>> have a long-term-support branch? >>> There is issue with stable vlc-2.2x which I plan to have in el7, als

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

>> preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does >>> ffmpeg >>> have a long-term-support branch? >> There is issue with stable vlc-2.2x which I plan to have in el7, also >> the current kodi 0.16 version doesn't cope well with ffmpeg 3.1x >

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/23/2016 12:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com>: >> Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for >> preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does ffmpeg >&g

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

>> preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does >>> ffmpeg >>> have a long-term-support branch? >> There is issue with stable vlc-2.2x which I plan to have in el7, also >> the current kodi 0.16 version doesn't cope well with ffmpeg 3.1x >

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

t; preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does > >> ffmpeg > >> have a long-term-support branch? > > There is issue with stable vlc-2.2x which I plan to have in el7, also > > the current kodi 0.16 version doesn't cope well with ffmpeg 3.1x >

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

On 08/23/2016 12:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com>: >> Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for >> preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does ffmpeg >&g

Re: ffmpeg for EL7

2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com>: > Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for > preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does ffmpeg > have a long-term-support branch? There is issue with stable v

ffmpeg for EL7

Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does ffmpeg have a long-term-support branch? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office