Re: SIMD vs no SIMD on i686 (was: [Bug 3975] executable stack flag prevents use of libx264.so.148 with selinux in enforcing mode)

> On 19 Jul 2016, at 02:12, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 02:55 +0200, domi...@greysector.net wrote: >> Hello, Sérgio. >> >> On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 02:35, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: >>> >>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3975 >>> >>>

Re: [xcpc] Built against libXaw because lesstif has been retired for F24

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 17:01, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > commit a0cdaee43b67a890b569ca6043f73183f9474134 > > Author: Andrea Musuruane > > Date: Sun Jul 17 17:01:36 2016

Re: SIMD vs no SIMD on i686 (was: [Bug 3975] executable stack flag prevents use of libx264.so.148 with selinux in enforcing mode)

2016-07-19 2:55 GMT+02:00 : > Hello, Sérgio. > > On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 02:35, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3975 >> >> --- Comment #4 from Sérgio Basto 2016-07-19 02:35:19 >> CEST --- >> (In reply to

Re: [xcpc] Built against libXaw because lesstif has been retired for F24

On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 09:26, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > > On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 17:01, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > > commit a0cdaee43b67a890b569ca6043f73183f9474134 > > > Author:

Re: SIMD vs no SIMD on i686 (was: [Bug 3975] executable stack flag prevents use of libx264.so.148 with selinux in enforcing mode)

On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 10:31, Simon Farnsworth wrote: > > > On 19 Jul 2016, at 02:12, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 02:55 +0200, domi...@greysector.net wrote: > >> Hello, Sérgio. > >> > >> On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 02:35, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:

Kodi

Hi, Michael I forgot to tell you , I and DavidVa , built kodi 16.1 for Fedora 24 in unitedrpms ,  https://github.com/UnitedRPMs?utf8=%E2%9C%93=kodi https://github.com/UnitedRPMs/kodi https://github.com/UnitedRPMs/kodi-platform (with support for p8- platform ) 

Re: About chromium packaging

On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 14:42 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > chromium is under review on Fedora: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=chromium from https://github.com/UnitedRPMs/packages/issues/13#issuecomment-233225170 Chromium was approved in Fedora Official repositories!!

Fedora 25 rebuild features (python)

I don't think there is a mass rebuilt planned for f25, but at least rel-eng has started to rebuild python packages for: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Automatic_Provides_for_Python_RPM_Packages I think we should do the same, anyone that can take care of this ? (probably require someone in

Re: About chromium packaging

2016-07-19 14:43 GMT+02:00 Andrea Musuruane : > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I've just saw that chromium was banned to RPM Fusion whislist >> http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist >> >> I haven't see any message from

No package on updates-testing

Hello. I can't install my packages (lives and moc) from rpmfusion-free-updates-testing yet. Should they be automatically pushed after their build or not ? -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/

Re: No package on updates-testing

2016-07-19 15:08 GMT+02:00 Antonio Trande : > Hello. > > I can't install my packages (lives and moc) from > rpmfusion-free-updates-testing yet. > > Should they be automatically pushed after their build or not ? both are present in the f24 repository Currently pushing

Re: [xcpc] Built against libXaw because lesstif has been retired for F24

On 07/19/2016 09:26 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 17:01, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > commit a0cdaee43b67a890b569ca6043f73183f9474134

Re: SIMD vs no SIMD on i686 (was: [Bug 3975] executable stack flag prevents use of libx264.so.148 with selinux in enforcing mode)

2016-07-19 13:36 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 09:35 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2016-07-19 2:55 GMT+02:00 : >> > >> > Hello, Sérgio. >> > >> > On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 02:35, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: >> > > >> > >

Re: [xcpc] Built against libXaw because lesstif has been retired for F24

On 07/19/2016 12:48 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 12:16, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/19/2016 09:26 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote:

Re: [xcpc] Built against libXaw because lesstif has been retired for F24

On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 12:16, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/19/2016 09:26 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > > wrote: > > > > On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 17:01, Andrea

Re: About chromium packaging

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hello, > > I've just saw that chromium was banned to RPM Fusion whislist > http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist > > I haven't see any message from the developers mailing list where this > has been discussed. > To be, the only

About chromium packaging

Hello, I've just saw that chromium was banned to RPM Fusion whislist http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist I haven't see any message from the developers mailing list where this has been discussed. To be, the only valid reason why a software can be banned from the repo is that it cannot be redistributed.

Re: SIMD vs no SIMD on i686 (was: [Bug 3975] executable stack flag prevents use of libx264.so.148 with selinux in enforcing mode)

On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 09:35 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-07-19 2:55 GMT+02:00  : > > > > Hello, Sérgio. > > > > On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 02:35, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3975 > > > > > > --- Comment

Re: SIMD vs no SIMD on i686 (was: [Bug 3975] executable stack flag prevents use of libx264.so.148 with selinux in enforcing mode)

2016-07-19 13:36 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 09:35 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2016-07-19 2:55 GMT+02:00 : >> > >> > Hello, Sérgio. >> > >> > On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 02:35, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: >> > > >> > >

Re: SIMD vs no SIMD on i686 (was: [Bug 3975] executable stack flag prevents use of libx264.so.148 with selinux in enforcing mode)

2016-07-19 12:37 GMT+02:00 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski : > On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 10:31, Simon Farnsworth wrote: >> >> > On 19 Jul 2016, at 02:12, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> > >> > On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 02:55 +0200, domi...@greysector.net wrote: >>

Re: [xcpc] Built against libXaw because lesstif has been retired for F24

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/19/2016 09:26 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski >> > wrote: >> >> On Sunday, 17 July 2016

Re: About chromium packaging

chromium is under review on Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=chromium On 07/19/2016 02:38 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hello, > > I've just saw that chromium was banned to RPM Fusion whislist > http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist > > I haven't see any message from the developers

[Bug 4112] Review request: rfpkg-minimal - Fork of fedpkg-minimal for RPM Fusion

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4112 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|33 | -- Configure

[Bug 3688] Review request: vdr-mpv - A mpv player plugin for VDR

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3688 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|33 | -- Configure

Re: SIMD vs no SIMD on i686 (was: [Bug 3975] executable stack flag prevents use of libx264.so.148 with selinux in enforcing mode)

On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 09:35, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-07-19 2:55 GMT+02:00 : > > Hello, Sérgio. > > > > On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 02:35, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3975 > >> > >> --- Comment #4 from Sérgio

Re: SIMD vs no SIMD on i686 (was: [Bug 3975] executable stack flag prevents use of libx264.so.148 with selinux in enforcing mode)

2016-07-19 10:31 GMT+02:00 Simon Farnsworth : > >> On 19 Jul 2016, at 02:12, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 02:55 +0200, domi...@greysector.net wrote: >>> Hello, Sérgio. >>> >>> On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 02:35, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:

Re: strange koji error

2016-07-19 18:18 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : .. > I think mpd have the same problem : > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/mpd.git > > When you got time, could you fix it ? , please Which problem do you see ? I don't see any recent buildSRPMFromSCM attempt for the mpd module.

Re: strange koji error

Hello, On Sex, 2016-07-08 at 10:17 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-07-08 7:29 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > > > > On Qui, 2016-07-07 at 17:50 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > > > > 2016-07-07 16:52 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: strange koji error

On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 18:39 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-07-19 18:18 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > .. > > > > I think mpd have the same problem : > > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/mpd.git > > > > When you got time,  could you fix it ? , now is fixed , but before

[Bug 3335] Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 --- Comment #44 from Joachim Bauch 2016-07-19 21:02:25 CEST --- Builds for f23/f24 are ready now. f23: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1138 f24: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1137

Re: [terminatorX/f24] Change from gtk2 to gtk3

On Qua, 2016-07-20 at 00:37 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2016-07-20 at 00:28 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 at 00:00, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > > > > > > Summary of changes: > > > > > >   3dc7333... Change from gtk2 to gtk3 (*) > > >

[Bug 3429] Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads games

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429 Sérgio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com

[Bug 3335] Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 --- Comment #45 from Nicolas Chauvet 2016-07-19 22:33:57 CEST --- rawhide should build now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

Re: [terminatorX/f24] Change from gtk2 to gtk3

On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 at 00:00, Leigh Scott wrote: > Summary of changes: > > 3dc7333... Change from gtk2 to gtk3 (*) > > (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent Could you explain why you're changing user experience in stable branches? Regards, Dominik --

Re: [terminatorX/f24] Change from gtk2 to gtk3

On Qua, 2016-07-20 at 00:28 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 at 00:00, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > Summary of changes: > > > >   3dc7333... Change from gtk2 to gtk3 (*) > > > > (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail > > sent >

[Bug 3335] Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 --- Comment #46 from Nicolas Chauvet 2016-07-19 23:42:52 CEST --- DEBUG util.py:421: Error: Package: gdal-libs-2.1.0-6.fc25.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:421: Requires: libpoppler.so.60()(64bit) Is there a

[Bug 3335] Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 --- Comment #48 from Joachim Bauch 2016-07-19 23:47:45 CEST --- (In reply to comment #46) > DEBUG util.py:421: Error: Package: gdal-libs-2.1.0-6.fc25.x86_64 (build) > DEBUG util.py:421: Requires:

[Bug 4112] Review request: rfpkg-minimal - Fork of fedpkg-minimal for RPM Fusion

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4112 Ben Rosser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug 3335] Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 --- Comment #47 from Joachim Bauch 2016-07-19 23:46:07 CEST --- (In reply to comment #45) > rawhide should build now Better (the SRPM now worked), but again broken in a different way: