Instead of bouncing back and forth between bugs, I was hoping that
things could be hashed out here instead.
Here's my current status, please let me know if there's something I
need to update:
Missing dependencies for MythTV on EPEL 6.
---
lirc [1] (built, pending for testing)
libfame [2] (built)
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:45 AM, David Timms wrote:
> Are some packages redhat ones ?
> some fedora-epel ?
> and eg ffmpeg etc are RPM Fusion
Well, we don't actually need ffmpeg since MythTV (for better or worse)
bundles it's own, but it is currently a requirement of some of the
other packages tha
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:>>> Instead of bouncing back
> and forth between bugs, I was hoping that>> things could be hashed out here
> instead.>>>> Here's my current status, ple
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>> On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>> I think the biggest roadblock at t
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> If you want to volunteer for one of this package, you need to submit a
> valid bug report that contain a unified patch against the rawhide
> branch.
You didn't mention, but I assume the patch is needed because these
packages are FTBFS with
I've gotten an error twice in a row that I don't think has anything to
do with my package. I got it once on i686 and the second time on
x86_64:
Starting job:
Time: Fri Jan 27 21:24:44 2012
Target: fedora-15-x86_64-rpmfusion_nonfree
UID: 3ea3182623fba11c38570ed43a52edb8b881b1e1
Architec
2012/1/30 Göran Uddeborg :
> Nicolas Chauvet:
>> Here is a list of packages that needs either a primary or co-maintainer:
>
>> lame - update needed in rawhide
>>
>> If you want to volunteer for one of this package, you need to submit a
>> valid bug report that contain a unified patch against the ra
I was trying to build the latest 0.24/fixes branch of MythTV and ran
into an issue where many C files were using functions (usleep, write,
close, gethostname, etc.) that were not available/(in scope?). It
turns out that unistd.h provided these functions so I included it in
all the offending files w
I've never gotten this error[1] before:
ransaction Summary
Upgrade 27 Package(s)
Total size: 30 M
RPM needs to be updated
ERROR You need to update rpm to handle:
rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir) is needed by file
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Can you try to reproduce with a local mock on your machine, if not
> done already ?
Just tried a local mock build and it failed with the same error.
Cleaned the buildroot, will let you know if it fixes it.
Richard
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I was hit by this in my local mocks earlier today.
>
> rm -rf /var/cache/mock/fedora-rawhide-*
> fixed it.
I did a --scrub=all just to go ahead and clean everything out but now
I'm getting the following in build.log:
Found '/builddir/build
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I did a --scrub=all just to go ahead and clean everything out but now
> I'm getting the following in build.log:
>
> Found '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/openshot-1.4.2-1.fc17.x86_64' in
> installed files; aborting
F
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> I did a --scrub=all just to go ahead and clean everything out but now
>> I'm getting the following in build.log:
>>
>> Found '/builddir/build/BUILD
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> It just requires a whole lot of time to finish. I might queue them one
> at a time next time. f16/i686 has finished after 268 minutes :)
Ahh... That's a long build time!
Thanks,
Richard
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:20 PM, David Timms wrote:
> I see some steps where taken in infra bug:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2170
>
> I resubmitted my audacity build again. It ran for 3 minutes, but failed.
> ===
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following the recent mass rebuilt that was delayed for several reasons,
> here is a list of package that fail to build from sources.
>
> Please note that we are currently expecting to branch at the same time
> as fedora, but becau
I'm still getting weird build errors for various reasons. I can't get
mythtv to build for devel due to some kind of mock timeout and while I
did get a good build for F16, I got this for F15:
-
error: Directory not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/myt
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/2/10 Richard Shaw :
>> I'm still getting weird build errors for various reasons. I can't get
>> mythtv to build for devel due to some kind of mock timeout and while I
>> did get a good build for F16, I g
Ok, now I'm totally stumped. I figured out what the build error is but
not the root cause.
The mythweather plugin requires perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8602 or
something like that. I've verified it is getting installed in root.log
but for some reason configure does not find it and disables the
mythweat
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Someone needs to volunteer to maintain mplayer within RPM Fusion, at
> this step nobody has volunteer and the previous maintainer is very
> busy.
>
> I wonder if I will remove mplayer from the F-17 tree at all if it's not
> updated.
I don
Ok, ran into my first problem:
cfg-common.h:530:5: error: initializer element is not constant
cfg-common.h:530:5: error: (near initialization for 'common_opts[114].p')
The line in cfg-common.h is using pp_help which is provided by the
ffmpeg header:
/usr/include/ffmpeg/libpostproc/postprocess.h
W
2012/2/18 Göran Uddeborg :
> Richard Shaw:
>> Now what?
>
> The configure.log doesn't give any hints?
No additional hints. For some reason the test for the perl module
fails on the RPM Fusion builder but not in a local mock build.
Richard
2012/2/18 Sérgio Basto :
> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 14:44 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Ok, now I'm totally stumped. I figured out what the build error is but
>> not the root cause.
>>
>> The mythweather plugin requires perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8602 or
>> so
2012/2/18 Sérgio Basto :
> I grab mythtv-0.24.2-1.fc15.src.rpm with wget
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-15-rpmfusion_free/11881-mythtv-0.24.2-1.fc15/mythtv-0.24.2-1.fc15.src.rpm
>
> and I build successfully with mock in fedora-15-i386 and
> fedora-15-x86_64
> ...
> MythWeather plug
Infra bug submitted:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2185
Thanks,
RIchard
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/2/19 Richard Shaw :
>> Infra bug submitted:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2185
> Can you verify if there is a difference in the package version from
> the buildsys root.log and yours
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> You migh be able to install a CentOS 6 x86_64 host to reproduce
Nope. Created a minimal CentOS 6 install in VirtualBox and was able to
build a package without issue... Must be something specific to the
builder.
Thanks,
Richard
I tried this build twice, the second several hours later to make sure
it wasn't a sync problem:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/11964-openshot-1.4.2-4.fc18/noarch/job.log
And I got the same/similar error:
Error Downloading Packages:
polkit-0.104-5.fc17.i686:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> This is due to:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2188
Whoops, looks like I put in a duplicate ticket then...
Thanks,
Richard
Looks like it's fixed!
Richard
I had a scriptlet error causing the icons to not be displayed after
install. Please push these builds directly to stable.
On a side note. I don't remember seeing lately if it's safe to build
for F-16 yet?
Thanks,
Richard
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> You probably mean F-17. And no, at least bug #2184 is not fixed yet and
> builds will fail.
Yes! Sorry.
Thanks,
Richard
One of my packages, imagination, relies on sox for audio support. Of
course this is provided by Fedora with MP3 disabled and can not be
duplicated in RPM Fusion.
I remember a review request that used a binary diff to add whatever
was not allowed in Fedora, and although it seems a rather messy way
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Isn't sox modular enought to allow plugins ?
> It might be an option for the fedora package.
Yes, it does offer plugins with dlopen support but from my research[1]
it seems that it still needs to pull in the required -devel packages
for th
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> You missunderstood, more basically:
> You pick the sox package, you rename it with sox-freeworld.
> You add the lame-devel and others and remove the final files that are
> already provided by sox.
> Probably that the sox binary is more or l
Ok, I tried the options and they seemed to work except for libmad...
checking mad.h usability... no
checking mad.h presence... no
checking for mad.h... no
checking whether to dlopen mad... yes
...
mp3dyn
id3tagyes
lame..yes
dlopen
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/2/24 Richard Shaw :
>> Ok, I tried the options and they seemed to work except for libmad...
>>
>> checking mad.h usability... no
>> checking mad.h presence... no
>> checking for mad.h... no
>>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 02/25/2012 03:52 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Nicolas Chauvet
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/2/24 Richard Shaw:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I tried the options and th
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>> I understand that we wouldn't use those options for the RPM Fusion
>> package, but wouldn't the Fedora package need these options enabled in
>> order to look for the additional plugin lib
Ok, I just "did" it and sox does find the mp3 plugin. I also built the
amrwb and amrnb plugins, but if we decide to keep those I'll have to
create a freeworld-free (mp3) and freeworld-nonfree (amr) package.
That being said. Do we have to stick with the freeworld name? Couldn't
we just call it:
so
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The standard we've come up for this, is to do 2 packages:
>
> sox-plugins-freeworld
> sox-plugins-nonfree
>
> Which would then have subpackages like this:
> sox-plugins-freeworld
> sox-plugins-freeworld-mp3
> sox-plugins-freeworld-ffmpeg
>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
[SNIP]
> I just changed the way ffmpeg support is queried since it was patched
> anyway and now everything builds. Please test as I do not have a F-17
> machine set up.
Does the previous download link you posted have this change? I have
F17
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/2/26 Nicolas Chauvet :
>> Thx Xavier, the F-17 build target seems restored.
>>
>> Please requeue your build.
>>
>> Nicolas (kwizart)
>
> F-17 target is restored "again" !
> (I've set glib2 in overrides as in fedora.)
Nicolas,
Along t
I'm sure most already do something similar, but in case you don't,
here's a simple one-liner I came up with:
for pkg in $(ls -d */); do cvs co $pkg; done
I end up running this twice because I keep the free and non free trees
in separate directories.
HTH,
Richard
Packages submitted:
sox-plugins-freeworld (mp3)
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2205
sox-plugins-nonfree (amrwb, armnb)
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2206
Thanks,
Richard
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/3/1 Richard Shaw :
>> I can build MythTV on F-17 or devel because of the following error:
>>
>> F-17:
>> DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: transcode-1.1.6-1.fc16.x86_64
> Can you remember why you wou
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Transcode is currently FTBFS and I have no time to fix it.
> Help welcomed.
Ok, two issues...
1. I still have to use the rawhide mock cfg to get F17 builds. Should
I put in a BZ to get the package updated?
2. mock can't install all the B
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> Transcode is currently FTBFS and I have no time to fix it.
>> Help welcomed.
>
> Ok, two issues...
>
> 1. I still have to use the rawhide mock cfg to get
2012/3/4 Sérgio Basto :
> Don't understand well all, you wrote: BR, stands for what Build Root ?
> For mplayer updates we have ffmpeg-0.10
Sorry, that's shorthand for BuildRequirement in spec files.
Thanks,
Richard
I know the policy is to not change from sysv init to systemd within a
release but I was thinking that akmods is pretty low risk. The main
reason being you're not likely to want to install it and then disable
it. Presumably, if you install it you want it to run.
I was only thinking about this for F
I still can't get a build for F15 due to the perl module issue[1] but
since it's the oldest supported Fedora release (and there's no major
showstopper bugs fixed by 0.24.2) I'm going to leave it alone for now.
The 16/17 builds should go ahead and get pushed into testing.
Thanks,
Richard
[1] http
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/3/5 Richard Shaw :
>> I know the policy is to not change from sysv init to systemd within a
>> release but I was thinking that akmods is pretty low risk. The main
>> reason being you're not likely to want to i
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/3/6 Richard Shaw :
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>> 2012/3/5 Richard Shaw :
>>>> I know the policy is to not change from sysv init to systemd within a
>>>> releas
I'm having trouble building a package that uses TBB, but only the
32bit builds are failing with this error:
libOpenImageIO.so.1.0.0: undefined reference to `__TBB_machine_store8_slow'
Any ideas? For now I'm %ifarch'ing around the problem.
Thanks,
Richard
While getting my package reviewed[1] it was discovered that sox is
bundling two libraries, libgsm and lpc10.
libgsm is already available so we're using the configure option to use
the system installed library and patching around configure still
looking for the directory (since it's now removed in
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ken Dreyer wrote:
>> I agree. If an upstream project eventually emerges, we can readdress
>> it, but otherwise it sounds really hairy. Provides: lpc10 would be
>> good.
>
> That should probably be Provides: bundled(lpc10) unless the shipped l
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> 2012/3/29 Sérgio Basto :
>> On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 12:45 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>>> 2012/3/29 Sérgio Basto :
>>> > Hi,
>>> > other question about kmod , when I install VirtualBox-OSE , shouldn't
>>> > Requires: kmod-VirtualBox-OSE ?
>>>
>>> On
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>> 2012/3/29 Sérgio Basto :
>>> On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 12:45 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>>>> 2012/3/29 Sérgio Basto :
>>>> > Hi,
>>>>
Ok, still strange...
# repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 --provides kmod-VirtualBox-OSE
VirtualBox-OSE-kmod = 4.1.10-1.fc16.1
kmod-VirtualBox-OSE = 4.1.10-1.fc16.1
kmod-VirtualBox-OSE(x86-32) = 4.1.10-1.fc16.1
kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-PAE = 4.1.10-1.fc16.1
kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-smp = 4.1.10-1.fc16.1
kmod-Vi
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> I'm trying to import and build my first package according to
> http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Import_your_package. I run into below. No
> joy, everything is new, eons since I used cvs, and I'm not brave enough to
> just try... Any hint out t
Did you get your problem sorted out?
Richard
I still can not get mythtv 0.24.2 to build for Fedora 15. For whatever
reason configure doesn't find perl-Format-DateTime-ISO8601 even though
it's installed. I can build it locally using mock so I have to assume
it's some sort of kernel issue with the build server.
So my question is: Can I do the
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/4/10 Richard Shaw :
>> I still can not get mythtv 0.24.2 to build for Fedora 15. For whatever
>> reason configure doesn't find perl-Format-DateTime-ISO8601 even though
>> it's installed. I can build it
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:22:59AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> Yes, the package builds fine locally for F15 in mock on a F16 host.
>> I've also setup a minimal CentOS 6 virtual machine and was able to
>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Which failure ?
> You can do a
> ./configure || cat config.log
Since it only happens on the build server I can't run configure
manually but if you do a search for the first instance of DateTime in
the build log[3] then you'll see what I'm
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> What happens if you run the perl test directly in the spec file? Something
> like
>
> %prep
> ...
> perl -e 'use DateTime::Format::ISO8601;'
> echo "Found, status: $?"
Well I just tried but now for some reason I'm getting an ssl handshake
erro
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> What happens if you run the perl test directly in the spec file? Something
>> like
>>
>> %prep
>> ...
>> perl -e 'use DateTime::Format::ISO8
Thanks to Alec for suggesting a way to capture the error message!
Here it is:
+ perl -e 'use DateTime::Format::ISO8601;'
The 'regex' parameter ("(?x-ism:^ (\d{4}) (\d\d) (\d\d) $)") to
DateTime::Format::Builder::Parser::create_single_parser was an
'unknown', which is not one of the allowed types:
I saw in the packaging report that the libfame build was "invalid".
I'm not sure what causes that but I went ahead and bumped the revision
and tagged a new build since the devel package was packaging a static
library. I went ahead and moved it to a -static sub-package for now
but we probably don't
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/4/10 Richard Shaw :
>> Author: hobbes1069
>>
>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/libfame/EL-6
>> In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv11440
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> libfame.spec
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/4/10 Richard Shaw :
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>> 2012/4/10 Richard Shaw :
>>>> Author: hobbes1069
>>>>
>>>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/libfame
Ok, I just verified MythTV doesn't need libfame... What should we do?
I can go ahead and build for F16 & F17 to harmonize it with EL6, but
I'm guessing it should be retired.
Richard
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/4/11 Richard Shaw :
>> Ok, I just verified MythTV doesn't need libfame... What should we do?
>> I can go ahead and build for F16 & F17 to harmonize it with EL6, but
>> I'm guessing it should be retir
I often try to build my packages for rawhide locally to make sure they
build with the latest gcc since new versions seem to be more
restrictive/picky.
In trying to build MythTV 0.25 for rawhide I get the following during
the package dependency install portion:
Error: Package: ffmpeg-libs-0.8.9-1.
2012/4/26 Sérgio Basto :
> though that wiki
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Testing#Testing_graphical_packages_with_mock_and_Xnest
> Testing graphical packages with mock and Xnest
>
> could help you, somehow
As I'm the author of the above wiki link, please let me know if this
helps you
Ok, *HOPEFULLY* everything is right this time. I've re-fixed the
logrotate issues (not sure what happened there) for both F-15 (SysV)
and F-16+ (SystemD) and added a new requirement for mytharchive that I
don't think was mentioned in the release notes.
Thanks,
Richard
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> FYI.
>
> Here is the current list of packages that Fail To Build From Sources
> from the RPM Fusion 17 tree.
> This is based on the dist tag from the development/17 repo.
>
> imagination
I forgot about this since before the fork
Ok I'm about to pull my hair out.
I'm trying to build my OpenImageIO package for EL6 but for some reason
qt3-devel keeps getting installed for the BuildRequirement.
In my spec file only "qt-devel" is specified. I've even gone to the
extent of spec'ing:
BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 4
and qt3-deve
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> FYI.
>>
>> Here is the current list of packages that Fail To Build From Sources
>> from the RPM Fusion 17 tree.
>> This is
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Ok I'm about to pull my hair out.
>
> I'm trying to build my OpenImageIO package for EL6 but for some reason
> qt3-devel keeps getting installed for the BuildRequirement.
>
> In my spec file only "qt-devel&quo
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/5/1 Richard Shaw :
>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> Ok I'm about to pull my hair out.
>>>
>>> I'm trying to build my OpenImageIO package for EL6 but for some re
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 01:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> Ok I'm about to pull my hair out.
>>
>> I'm trying to build my OpenImageIO package for EL6 but for some reason
>> qt3-devel keeps getting installed for
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> -- free --
> avidemux ?
Not sure what's up with avidemux. Built fine in mock for me. Bumped
the release and rebuilding...
Richard
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> -- free --
>> avidemux ?
>
> Not sure what's up with avidemux. Built fine in mock for me. Bumped
> the release and rebuilding...
Build succeeded.
Richard
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/5/4 Richard Shaw :
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>>> -- free --
>>>> avidemux ?
>>>
>>>
I'm attempting to update my ZFS kmod packages and I released that for
the akmods package I also need a systemd service file so that it runs
early enough, but also so that the SPL kmod is built before the ZFS
kmod.
kmodtool doesn't give me any way to modify what files are packaged for
the akmods pa
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm attempting to update my ZFS kmod packages and I released that for
> the akmods package I also need a systemd service file so that it runs
> early enough, but also so that the SPL kmod is built before the ZFS
> kmod.
>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/5/23 Richard Shaw :
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> I'm attempting to update my ZFS kmod packages and I released that for
>>> the akmods package I also need a syst
Yay!
Richard
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
wrote:
> Can someone take a look?
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2338
>
> I tested it in file-roller with:
>
> - single volume rar files
> - multi-volume rar files
> - password protected rar files
>
> If I didn't sc
I have someone ready to test the EL-6 mythtv build as soon as it's
available in the repository. I would appreciate if it got signed and
pushed sooner rather than later.
Thanks,
Richard
Unless something other than libaacs will use the freeworld package, I
think this is a prime example of why there needs to be exceptions to
the rules :)
I don't know of any formal approval mechanism here, but my vote would
be to allow the bundled/static linking for this and just following the
Fedor
I would really like someone to review FreeCAD:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2300
I know this is considered non-free because it depends on OCE so I
understand why some would rather avoid it.
Is there anyone who needs something reviewed that is not opposed to this?
Thanks,
Richa
Just an FYI, mlt 0.8.0 is released.
If no one objects I would like to update it and I believe that I am a
co-maintainer of kdenlive, which is the only package that I can tell
would need to be rebuilt.
# repoquery --whatrequires mlt
kdenlive-0:0.8-1.fc16.x86_64
kdenlive-0:0.8.2-1.fc16.x86_64
kdenl
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> On 06/19/2012 10:21 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> Just an FYI, mlt 0.8.0 is released.
>>
>> If no one objects I would like to update it and I believe that I am a
>> co-maintainer of kdenlive, which is the only
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Would you mind waiting for ffmpeg-0.11.1? The rebuilds should kick off
> this weekend IIRC.
Too late for rawhide, but I'll wait on the rest.
Thanks,
Richard
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/6/19 Richard Shaw :
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>> Would you mind waiting for ffmpeg-0.11.1? The rebuilds should kick off
>>> this weekend IIRC.
>>
>> Too late
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> rpm.livna.org is throwing 403 errors for all accesses today. Add to that
> that the mirrors have all been stale for eons (they don't have any directory
> newer than 14) and you get an entirely broken repo.
Yup... I pretty much gave up
During the review process for freecad[1] it was discovered that it had
a bundled copy of PyCXX. It's unusual as it is not designed to be
built into a stand alone library, static or shared. In fact it does
not contain a make file.
The package currently does not exist in Fedora, however, a review
re
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/7/2 Richard Shaw :
>> Author: hobbes1069
>>
>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/mpg123/EL-6
>> In directory old02.ovh.rpmfusion.lan:/tmp/cvs-serv22845
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> .cvsignore
1 - 100 of 571 matches
Mail list logo
