On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 20:56 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Karel Volný [06/06/2011 19:49] :
unfortunately, the new version
mplayer-1.0-0.123.20110412svn.fc15.x86_64 crashes on my system
every time I try to pause the playback
I'm getting the same thing here.
I met kwizart IRL
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 18:06 -0400, Randy Yates wrote:
How do I get off this mailing list?
you got instructions on headers of this emails :
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/mailman/listinfo/rpmfusion-developers
I send to you a message to confirm unsubscribe.
This message will have a link that you
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 14:22 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Hello,
I would like the multimedia stack update to be tested accurately
tested for F-15.
The key feature is the ffmpeg update to a pre-0.7 snapshot before the
x264 bump requirement of 115 ABI (instead of 114 that we have in
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 11:57 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 19/08/2011 07:53, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
One package is not IIRC.
Just check my repo.
just libdvdcss still need livna repo but since 2008 doesn't change
http://download.videolan.org/pub/libdvdcss/1.2.10/
I got .x86_64 1.2.10-1
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 08:19 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I was bitten by the akmods bug[1] when I upgraded to F15. Is anyone
working on this? The fix seems to be pretty simple...
Thanks,
Richard
[1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1813
well, I use this command to
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 09:04 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
Ok, not looking before I lept I'm in deep again now having all the
open akmods bugs assigned to me! :)
I'll start reviewing them as I have time. Does anyone have suggestions
on which are the most serious? I'm thinking I should deal with
Hi Richard ,
After set resolution to FIXED , you may change to CLOSE.
So we need 2 steps to really close the bug.
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 21:28 +0200, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 15:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
2011/10/6 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
Hi Richard ,
After set resolution to FIXED , you may change to CLOSE.
So we need 2 steps to really close the bug.
That's annoying... Does it really need to be CLOSED or or is
Resolved:FIXED
Hi,
I recently update one laptop with Fedora 14 and nvidia graphics drives,
and once more I don't got X after kernel upgrade.
As my experience in rpmfusion, I got akomd which build kmod and
everything works great .
So to avoid this happens often after upgrade kernel, I suggest on wiki
howto ,
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 19:11 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2011/10/15 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
Hi,
I recently update one laptop with Fedora 14 and nvidia graphics drives,
and once more I don't got X after kernel upgrade.
As my experience in rpmfusion, I got akomd which build kmod
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 05:30 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
You're supposed to upgrade using gnome-packagekit or KPackageKit,
which will
display a list of updates. If you see a kernel update without a
matching
kmod update in the list, just uncheck it, where's the problem?
To much work or a
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 08:31 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
* deal with any resulting errors, because some kernel API changed and
the
akmod was not updated for it.
In stable releases not often change kernel major version , better , and
it is better than not boot .
which happens to me all the
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 08:31 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
A common user surely does NOT want to:
* install a compiler toolchain,
* install kernel development headers,
just one time , at first installation, never have to do it again .
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 19:49 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
I'm not sure to understand what your problem is ?
So you prefer akmod.., and then?
So I suggest on wiki howto , recommend use akmods specially for kmods
of video graphics
example: http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia
Please remind that
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 13:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
The Fedora 16 update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xine-lib-1.1.20-1.fc16
is now queued for stable.
This has now hit stable on the Fedora mirrors, we need
xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.20-3.fc16
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 14:19 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 13:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
The Fedora 16 update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xine-lib-1.1.20-1.fc16
is now queued for stable.
This has now hit stable on the Fedora
hi,
talking with Josh Stone on fedora-devel ML, F15 kernel have been fixed
to compile all modules of kmods of VirtualBox.
Josh Stone said: All of them can compile now, including vboxpci.
from here
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-December/160262.html
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 12:59 +0100, rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org
wrote:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/16: 9
VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.6-4.fc16
Hi,
On F-16 any objection on pushing virtualBox 4.1.6 to updates stable ?
We don't had any error reported and 4.1.8 is out , and will be the next
packages on updates/testing
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 17:46 +0100, rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org
wrote:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 15
VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.2-1.fc15
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 22:11 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2011/12/23 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 17:46 +0100, rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org
wrote:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 15
VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.2-1.fc15
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 21:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I have to review hal things on F-15 , like re-add, BuildRequires:
hal-devel
I had review F-15, I think, HAL could be removed since F-13 , anyway I
think nothing important was missing.
So plan is:
rawhide - VB 4.1.8 (not yet pushed)
F
On Sat, 2011-12-24 at 13:00 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
So plan is:
rawhide - VB 4.1.8 (not yet pushed)
F-16 stable - VB 4.1.6 (pushed)
F-16 testing - VB 4.1.8 (not yet build)
F-15 stable - VB 4.1.6 (4.1.2 was pushed , VB 4.1.6 build but
kmod-4.1.6 fails to build with Error
On Sat, 2011-12-24 at 14:50 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
F-15 stable - VB 4.1.2 (was pushed, but miss VB-4.1.2-kmod), lets
move
forward to VB 4.1.6 (VB 4.1.6 build but VB-kmod-4.1.6 fails to build
with Error: No Package found for VirtualBox-OSE-kmodsrc = 4.1.6 ?!) .
Now I could build VirtualBox
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 12:42 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Author: kwizart
Update of /cvs/free/rpms/VirtualBox-OSE/devel
In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv3904/devel
Modified Files:
VirtualBox-OSE.spec
Log Message:
Fix with install -D
Index:
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 22:40 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:01:21 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
About indentation , I use coding style my tabs have 4 spaces.
:vim set expandtab set softtabstop=4 set ts=4 set sw=4
so all .spec have a mixed with really
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 23:52 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
I'm more interested by having the changelog diff between devel and
F-16 sorted out.
diff devel/ F-16/ -u
I had done more changelogs on devel, because I do and undo some
patches , when I copy from devel to F-16 , I wrote changelog again
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 19:20 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
This ends to have /etc/init.d/builddir/build/SOURCES/vboxweb-service
which will not work.
It could use $(basename ${SOURCE10}) but then there is no interest in
using install -D at first step.
May I update F-15 also ? with yours patch
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 21:30 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
I would like to test a local mock build of a kmod package for rawhide,
but yum is not happy:
$ mock rebuild openafs-kmod-1.6.1-0.pre1.fc17.src.rpm
[snip]
-- 10:buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-current-16-5.i686
Error: Package:
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 15:45 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
2012/1/2 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
I guess the problem is that you have :
%define buildforkernels current
when in rawhide we should use
%define buildforkernels akmod
Thanks for the reply. As an aside, I was interested to see
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 15:59 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
2012/1/2 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
With your suggestion, mock does build my kmod- package successfully,
but I'm more interested in testing out the full package builds, and
not only akmods.
you have other option :
-%define
Hi,
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 00:03 +0100, rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org
wrote:
VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-4.1.8-1.fc16.1, VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-4.1.8-1.fc16.2
and VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-4.1.8-1.fc16.3 are on updates with
VirtualBox-4.1.6-1.fc16.5, I think that you forgot push
VirtualBox-4.1.8-1.fc16.1-1.f
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 00:17 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
As you might know, gcc-4.7 is available in the buildroot.
I will proceed with a mass rebuild on the 12/01, the same as fedora.
VirtualBox doesn't build with gcc-4.7
I had alter 2 patches begging to build
Should I commit it ?
, but it
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 02:45 +0100,
rpmfusion-build...@lists.rpmfusion.org wrote:
11341 (VirtualBox-OSE): Build on target fedora-16-rpmfusion_free succeeded.
Build logs may be found at
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-16-rpmfusion_free/11341-VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.8-2.fc16/
Hi, I
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:53 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 16.01.2012 14:48, Sérgio Basto pisze:
Hi, so if I do :
yum list \*mame\*
Installed Packages
gmameui.x86_640.2.10-1.fc12 @rpmfusion-nonfree
mame.x86_64 0.144u5-1
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2113
Sebastian Vahl is active ? or smplayer have co-maintainers?
, bug report have one month
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
Hi,
I updated bug #2113, with external src.rpm .
May I be co-maintainer of this package (smplayer) ?
If yes ? what should I do next ?
Thanks,
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 19:09 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
I think he is unavailable
On 1/28/12, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
https
Sorry for that newbie question
make a formal ACL change request
How I do that ?
where is this explain on wiki ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 10:32 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Sorry for that newbie question
make a formal ACL change request
How I do that ?
where is this explain on wiki ?
This is the general procedure:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 00:02 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Please comment.
We got many problems to compile VirtualBox on F-17 , but UsrMove is not
one of them .
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 04:30 +0100,
rpmfusion-build...@lists.rpmfusion.org wrote:
11595 (VirtualBox-OSE): Build on target fedora-15-rpmfusion_free succeeded.
Build logs may be found at
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-15-rpmfusion_free/11595-VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.8-1.fc15/
Hi,
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 23:26 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/1/31 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
Hi,
I updated bug #2113, with external src.rpm .
May I be co-maintainer of this package (smplayer) ?
If yes ? what should I do next ?
Thanks,
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 19:09 +0800
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 04:29 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 00:54 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Looking at the KDE-related ones:
Looking randomly , I saw one or two with BuildRequires:i586
don't remember exactly where, sorry ! , but it is an obvious lack of
maintainers
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 14:27 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/2/11 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 04:29 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 00:54 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Looking at the KDE-related ones:
Looking randomly , I saw one or two
Since in this thread we are talking about cleanups , I remembered that
we could retire properly:
sdlmess-data.noarch sdlmess-tools.x86_64 sdlmess.x86_64 sdlmame.x86_64
sdlmame-tools.x86_64
since they are obsolete by
mess-data-0.145-1.fc16.noarch
mess-tools-0.145-1.fc16.x86_64
Hi, I need an update of mock-rpmfusion-free and mock-rpmfusion-nonfree
which ships F17.
mock-1.1.21-1.fc16.noarch already have it .
or how do you test F-17 builds ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 14:44 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
Ok, now I'm totally stumped. I figured out what the build error is but
not the root cause.
The mythweather plugin requires perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8602 or
something like that. I've verified it is getting installed in root.log
but for
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 15:38 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
2012/2/18 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 14:44 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
Ok, now I'm totally stumped. I figured out what the build error is but
not the root cause.
The mythweather plugin requires perl
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 02:47 -0800, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
I just wanted to update everyone on my progress in trying to build a
newer package for mplayer.
I filed this bug report with the mplayer group:
http://bugzilla.mplayerhq.hu/show_bug.cgi?id=2043
I'm not sure if they will honor it
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 08:28 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone needs to volunteer to maintain mplayer within RPM Fusion, at
this step nobody has volunteer and the previous maintainer is very
busy.
I wonder if I
as a quick answer
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 10:00 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Can you please pick a known version of x264 from RPM Fusion devel,
branch.
well ./configure of ffmpeg requires x264 = 0.118 which x264 from RPM
Fusion devel doesn't met that require.
Maintaining x264 is another
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 13:22 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
In case anyone is interested, I am willing to discuss the packaging on
IRC sometime on Sunday - my nick is belegdol and I can be found in
rpmfusion-devel.
OK I will meet you there my nick is sergiomb or sergiomb1 depends on
the mood
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 13:20 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 26.02.2012 12:49, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
2012/2/26 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com:
W dniu 26.02.2012 11:18, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
2012/2/26 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was trying to update mplayer and
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 14:10 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 27.02.2012 13:54, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 27.02.2012 13:20, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
On 02/27/2012 12:40 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 27.02.2012 07:16, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
On 02/27/2012 02:55 AM, Kevin Kofler
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 14:49 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 27.02.2012 05:16, Andrew Schultz pisze:
Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to update mplayer and most of the problems I am having are
due to using shared ffmpeg, which is discouraged and unsupported by
upstream.
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 16:20 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
There is only mplayer src.rpm there:
https://share.ols.inode.at/JWTTUS3OVG1C0CJ3QQCHDQKFW1BG3J9MF2F0UIYP
One cannot I am afraid. This hosting is quite bad but that's all I
have
given that using fedorapeople for mplayer is a no-go.
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 18:08 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/2/29 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 00:41 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hi,
after taking care of mplayer in F-17+ I have tried to check which is the
latest mplayer compiling w/ ffmpeg in F-16
Hi,
as a quick note.
yesterday , I saw virtualbox commits , and they do more than 5 patches,
to fix gcc compiles, so I think in next release of VirtualBox, I will be
able to compile on F-17 .
Regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:24 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 03/03/2012 12:32 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 17:08 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 20:27 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Miro fails its build during the check phase on Fedora 16
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 16:56 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Transcode is currently FTBFS and I have no time to fix it.
Help welcomed.
Ok, two
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 13:18 +0100, Karel Volný wrote:
Hi,
...
2. mock can't install all the BR's:
Error: Package: ffmpeg-libs-0.8.9-1.fc17.x86_64
(rpmfusion-free-rawhide) Requires: libopenjpeg.so.3()(64bit)
I'm still hitting this issue trying to build in devel (rawhide)
with
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:22 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 03/04/2012 01:13 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:24 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
The tests involve importing some libraries that fail if DISPLAY
is not set, thus the reason for using xvfb-run
Hi,
when I commit VirtualBox-kmod for new release
I change
-%define buildforkernels newest
+%define buildforkernels akmod
I guess, when define akmod, kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.10-1.fc16.1.x86_64
requires akmod-VirtualBox-OSE
kmod-VirtualBox-OSE is just a meta package, but what is the
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:56 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/3/28 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
Hi,
when I commit VirtualBox-kmod for new release
I change
-%define buildforkernels newest
+%define buildforkernels akmod
You are never expected to use akmod in stable branches. only
Hi,
other question about kmod , when I install VirtualBox-OSE , shouldn't
Requires: kmod-VirtualBox-OSE ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 12:45 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
2012/3/29 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
Hi,
other question about kmod , when I install VirtualBox-OSE , shouldn't
Requires: kmod-VirtualBox-OSE ?
On PAE kernels, this would unnecessarily require the non-PAE kernel
and non-PAE kmod
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 14:09 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
# repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 --provides kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-PAE
VirtualBox-OSE-kmod = 4.1.8-1.fc16.16
kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-PAE = 4.1.8-1.fc16.16
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 08:09 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Sorry, hit the Shortcut for sending mail :-/
Sérgio Basto wrote on 30.03.2012 00:59:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 14:09 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
# repoquery
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 08:09 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Sorry, hit the Shortcut for sending mail :-/
Sérgio Basto wrote on 30.03.2012 00:59:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 14:09 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
# repoquery
I had to clean this , I have a local repo called VirtualBox, so we see two
VirtualBox
yum install VirtualBox-OSE
Installing:
VirtualBox-OSE x86_64 4.1.12-1.fc16
Installing for dependencies:
kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-3.3.0-8.fc16.x86_64 x86_64
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 09:57 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
You need to issue kmod-VirtualBox-OSE or kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-PAE on
kernel-PAE.
You might have a corner case when a previous kmod isn't built for an
installed kernel.
are you saying that we need do :
yum install VirtualBox-OSE
I will take care of this for new kernel ASAP.
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 19:29 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Author: kwizart
Update of /cvs/free/rpms/VirtualBox-OSE-kmod/F-15
In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv16333
Modified Files:
VirtualBox-OSE-kmod.spec
Log Message:
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 02:21 +, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
New releases comes very fast now. smplayer-0.8.0 and smtube-1.1 released.
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/smplayer/smplayer-0.8.0.tar.bz2
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/smplayer/smtube-1.1.tar.bz2
Hi,
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 14:09 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
# repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 --provides kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-PAE
VirtualBox-OSE-kmod = 4.1.8-1.fc16.16
kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-PAE = 4.1.8-1.fc16.16
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 11:41 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 02:21 +, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
New releases comes very fast now. smplayer-0.8.0 and smtube-1.1 released.
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/smplayer/smplayer-0.8.0.tar.bz2
http
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 11:41 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 02:21 +, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
New releases comes very fast now. smplayer-0.8.0 and smtube-1.1 released.
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/smplayer/smplayer-0.8.0.tar.bz2
http
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:48 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:13:25 -0500
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to Alec for suggesting a way to capture the error message!
Here it is:
+ perl -e 'use DateTime::Format::ISO8601;'
The 'regex' parameter
After Fedora rebuild kBuild with gcc 4.7, kmk_sed doesn't work
correctly.
I reported upstream http://svn.netlabs.org/kbuild/ticket/112 .
I couldn't find any solution, but I found one workaround which is use
kBuild bundle in VirtualBox.
May I do this exception until we find what happen to kBuild
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 00:06 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:15:57 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:48 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:13:25 -0500
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to Alec
Hi,
we got an open bug https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272
complains about it .
But was is missing is akmod-VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.12
yum install akmod-VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.12
No package akmod-VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.12 available.
I saw that I built it in
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 00:23 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
we got an open bug https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272
complains about it .
But was is missing is akmod-VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.12
Sorry I have some typos here I mean bug complains about
VirtualBox-OSE-kmodsrc fails
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 00:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Rebuild kmod with buildforkernels = current again ?
OK Nicolas did that, before I wrote this email :)
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
Hi, I can't build kmods with current even locally I got :
10:buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-current-17-0.2.x86_64
Error: Package:
10:buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-current-17-0.2.x86_64
(rpmfusion-free-needsign)
Requires: kernel-devel-uname-r = 3.3.0-1.fc17.x86_64
-kerneldevpkgs-current is blocking build to a
specific kernel and should be possible to build to the available kernel.
Other opinion is just have one F17 , don't see advantages in having
testing branch, but is just my opinion I may not have the all picture.
Thanks,
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 17:40 +0100, Sérgio
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 01:46 +0200, rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org
wrote:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 17: 87
(...)
NEW akmods-0.4.0-3.fc17 : Automatic kmods build and install tool
hum this akmods is not in
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 01:04 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 01:46 +0200, rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org
wrote:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 17: 87
(...)
NEW akmods-0.4.0-3.fc17 : Automatic kmods build and install tool
hum this akmods
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:22 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 03/04/2012 01:13 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:24 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
The tests involve importing some libraries that fail if DISPLAY
is not set, thus the reason for using xvfb-run
Hi,
One question Nicolas, you have done an update for UsrMove, on
VirtualBox-OSE-kmod.spec.
Should I commit same update on F16 and F15 ?
Reference :
http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/VirtualBox-OSE-kmod/devel/VirtualBox-OSE-kmod.spec?root=freer1=1.63r2=1.62view=patch
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 22:09 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 11:41 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 02:21 +, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
New releases comes very fast now. smplayer-0.8.0 and smtube-1.1 released.
http
On Ter, 2012-05-01 at 20:23 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
mjpegtools
needs a patch for gcc 4.7
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=3515859group_id=5776atid=305776
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php?group_id=5776atid=305776file_id=440578aid=3515859
send to you patch
On Qua, 2012-05-02 at 10:40 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/5/2 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
On Ter, 2012-05-01 at 20:23 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
mjpegtools
needs a patch for gcc 4.7
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=3515859group_id=5776atid=305776
On Sex, 2012-05-04 at 08:35 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/5/1 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com:
Hello,
.
Here is an updated package list,
Hi,
-- free --
avidemux ?
avidemux is one FTBFS in F-17 ?
streamdvd (orphan ?)
On Qua, 2012-05-09 at 21:42 +0200, rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org
wrote:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/17: 7
VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-4.1.14-2.fc17
right
On Qui, 2012-05-10 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Le 9 mai 2012 23:17, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com a écrit :
On Qua, 2012-05-09 at 21:42 +0200,
rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org
wrote
Hi
On Qua, 2012-05-16 at 04:58 +0200,
rpmfusion-build...@lists.rpmfusion.org wrote:
Error: could not check out VirtualBox-4_1_14-6_fc18 from
fedora-development-rpmfusion_free - output was:
cvs server: cannot find module `VirtualBox' - ignored
cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules
On Qua, 2012-05-16 at 23:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
So I'm talking to a guy on IRC (freegz), who uses the NVIDIA driver. It
seems that when he converted from non-graphical grub2 to graphical grub2
(which we've changed relatively recently in F17), the NVIDIA driver
stopped working. It
:Kernel module for VirtualBox-OSE
Group: System Environment/Kernel
@@ -96,6 +96,9 @@
%changelog
+* Thu May 24 2012 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com - 4.1.14-2.1
+- Rebuilt for updated kernel
+
* Fri May 11 2012 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com - 4.1.14-2
- build new current
On Dom, 2012-05-27 at 12:46 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/5/27 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com:
Dear RPM Fusion developers,
ffmpeg-0.11 was released a few days ago. Do you think we should try to
push it to Fedora 17?
I'm not against having it as an update, but:
- Is the ABI
On Qua, 2012-06-13 at 17:37 +0200, rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org
wrote:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 17: 2
VirtualBox-4.1.16-3.fc17
VirtualBox-kmod-4.1.16-1.fc17.1
This release VirtualBox-4.1.16-3 , have new udev rules, which just make
USB works,
On Qui, 2012-06-14 at 18:41 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
By scheduling the update for the next weekend, would you prefer me
to
wait with with building ffmpeg until then? Or would you prefer me to
build it right away to give the maintainers more time to test?
There is a certain number of
1 - 100 of 1246 matches
Mail list logo
