On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 17:21 +0100, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 18:08 +0200, Sergio Pascual via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > Hello, I requested a new branch for nonfree/pgplot a few months
> > ago
> > by cl
Hi,
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/wxsvg/
as you can see I'm the main maintainer of this package, why in Fedora I
just have commit permissions ?
I don't mind that you move things to Fedora , if you maintain it ,
which is not the case. As far as I know wxsvg is only used by
Thank you Dominik, for being understanding and for all the information.
OK I see the purpose
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:35 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> On Friday, 01 September 2023 at 12:07, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 18:08 +0200, Sergio Pascual via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hello, I requested a new branch for nonfree/pgplot a few months ago
> by clicking a button in https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb, but it
> still says "awaiting for review".
>
> Is there a newer method for
you need use koji version of centos 7 i.e. rpmfusion needs one older
koji client version
please check is this is the fix [1] can be completely unrelated ...
https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/3889
On Sat, 2023-10-28 at 19:03 +0200, Michal Schorm via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> I tried
Hello,
I happily announce that RPM Fusion Fedora 39 is General Available (GA).
Thank you all that make it happen .
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an
ok , I will try not forget check this one also , I checked that f39
mirrors are working but f38 is the one that got broken :)
On Thu, 2023-08-17 at 10:51 +0200, Adrian Reber via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 08:13:47AM +0200, Ralf Corsépius via
> rpmfusion-developers
On Wed, 2023-08-16 at 15:41 +, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> but mock fails because the openh264 repos for rawhide are returning
> http 404. I'll give it some time to settle then will try again later.
but is a problem of mock repos configuration or mirrors ?
from mock configuration [1] we got
On Fri, 2023-08-25 at 15:26 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> I ran rfpkg retire on master branch
> and opened https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6753 to
> retire
> in pkgdb
I fixed rfpkg in PR [1] to allow retire packages in pkgdb , of course,
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 23:25 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > I tried a scratch build on RPM Fusion which I haven't done in some
> > time and was greeted with the following
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> I tried a scratch build on RPM Fusion which I haven't done in some
> time and was greeted with the following:
>
> $ rfpkg scratch-build --srpm
>
> setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1673913600
> Wrote:
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:34 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:29 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 23:25 +0000, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
> > developers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600,
Hi,
I did a wiki page where have instructions how tunneling matrix user to
access to #rpmfusion on Libera.Chat
https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/Matrix%20tunneling
the most complicated is register your user on IRC Nickserver because
#rpmfusion channel only accept registered users
Happy hacking !
BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
EPEL 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170821
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 10:18 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 19:43 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On 3/19/23 12:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
> > EPEL 8
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170821
> >
> >
>
> Added you.
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 19:17 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 19:37 +0100, Karel Volný via rpmfusion-
> developers
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to retire qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld
> >
> > So I
//github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-tools/blob/master/mass-rebuild.py#L33
>
> On 19/02/2023 22:41, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I spent this weekend understanding why when update my vm to F38
> > branched I got a lot of [1] the
Hi,
I spent this weekend understanding why when update my vm to F38
branched I got a lot of [1] the key ID d651ff2e is "our" key RPM-GPG-
KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-2020
For an introduction to this topic I recommend this 2 articles [2] .
In resume rpm sign with SHA1 aren't installed in F38
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 19:37 +0100, Karel Volný via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to retire qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld
>
> So I have followed
> https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package
>
> But trying rfpkg retire, I got
>
> [kvolny@kvolny
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> As fedora has branched already ('or close'), here is the plan for
> rpmfusion.
>
> I'm proposing that we skip the mass-rebuild this time.
I can do the mass-rebuild this weekend
> The Main reason is, we are
On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 08:45 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Le ven. 10 févr. 2023 à 02:33, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers
> a écrit :
> >
> > Too late, rpmfusion is branched,
> >
> > On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
>
> On 10/02/2023 12:03, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 08:45 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
> > developers wrote:
> > > Le ven. 10 févr. 2023 à 02:33, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-
> > > developers
&g
On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 18:10 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> On Saturday, 08 July 2023 at 14:59, Petr Menšík wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > tried to rebuild it on f38. It failed to start in default
> > configuration:
> >
> > čec 08 14:45:00 pemensik-t460
2022-02-27, Sunday :: MPlayer 1.5 released , I take it
On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 11:16 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I decided to orphan mplayer as I haven't used it for years. Feel free
> to
> pick it up.
>
> Regards,
> Dominik
> --
> Fedora
=6692
>
The bug was opened today
>
> Upstream is virtually dead.
>
>
> https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/mplayer.git/shortlog
>
Thank you for the tip
> On 30/05/2023 11:09, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > 2022-02-27, Sunday :: MPlayer 1.5 released
Hi,
Mass rebuild for F39 is complete .
And we have this failures :
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
Failed builds: 17
Package: EmptyEpsilon
Package: audacity-freeworld
Package: cannonball
Package: d1x
Package: deadbeef
Package: freeguide
Package:
via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Motion build fixed.
>
> сб, 5 авг. 2023 г. в 14:47, Vascom :
> >
> > Motion fix on the way.
> > May be 2-3 days.
> >
> > пт, 4 авг. 2023 г., 05:16 Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
> > :
> > >
&
a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
>
> From: Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 8:15 AM
> To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org>
> Cc: Vascom ; Sérgio
not sure how relevant the freeguide package is anymore, but I
> > > went ahead and fixed it.
> > > It just needed its min Java source number bumped up.
> > >
> > > However, I don't seem to have permission to push changes to this
> > > package
to go
> >
> > Failed builds: 7
> > Package: d1x
> > Package: freeguide
> > Package: gsview
> > Package: lives
> > Package: mplayer
> > Package: pcsx2
> > Package: telegram-desktop
> >
Hi,
I'm going do a sidetag this weekend I will rebuild the 15 dependencies
[1] let me know, if you know of any impediment.
Thank you
[1]
Depending on: jpegxl (15)
ImageMagick (maintained by: dcavalca, epel-packagers-sig, kalev, luya,
ngompa, remi, salimma, sergiomb)
Hi,
Mass rebuild for jpegxl-0.8.1 finished, all packages built successfully
and sent to rawhide:
aom-3.6.0-2.fc39
darktable-4.2.1-4.fc39
ffmpeg-6.0-7.fc39
geeqie-2.0.1-5.fc39
gimp-2.10.34-5.fc39
gthumb-3.12.2-8.fc39
ImageMagick-7.1.1.11-2.fc39
imlib2-1.11.1-2.fc39
jpegxl-0.8.1-2.fc39
Just resend it , because the late email was delivered 3 days later
Delivery-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 21:07:43 +0100
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 12:52 +0100, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the RPMFusion f39 branch is ready and also mass rebuild was done and
> is
09:14 +0300, Vascom via rpmfusion-developers
> wrote:
> > Motion build fixed.
> >
> > сб, 5 авг. 2023 г. в 14:47, Vascom :
> > >
> > > Motion fix on the way.
> > > May be 2-3 days.
> > >
> > > пт, 4 авг. 2023 г., 05:16 Sérgi
Hi,
the RPMFusion f39 branch is ready and also mass rebuild was done and is
completed.
if you find any problem, please let us know.
Happy hacking
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To
> On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 17:21 +, Andrew Bauer via rpmfusion-
> > > developers wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure how relevant the freeguide package is anymore, but
> I
> > > > went ahead and fixed it.
> > > > It just needed its min Java source number bumped
Hi,
I happily announce that RPMFusion f40 branch is ready to use
if you find any problem, please let us know.
Happy hacking,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an
Hi Emmanuel ,
Please add me to bugzilla components:
- lpf-cleartype-fonts
- lpf-mscore-fonts
- lpf-mscore-tahoma-fonts
- lpf-spotify-client
- discord
I missed lpf-spotify and discord bug reports
Thank you,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
I think we will need vlc-freeworld
# codecs which cannot be shipped in Fedora proper
%bcond freeworld 0
%bcond faad2 %{with freeworld}
%bcond x264 %{with freeworld}
%bcond x265 %{with freeworld}
On Fri, 2023-12-15 at 10:30 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:
> commit
it is an known bug , you need an old koji client , I use centos 7 vm
or apply this [1] on /usr/lib/python3.11/site-
packages/koji_cli/commands.py
[1]
https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/3889#request_diff
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 10:13 +, Martin Gansser via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
>
smplayer is moving to Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256940
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 09:46 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> As the mass rebuild is currently occurring in fedora we'd better wait
> for it's publication , also there are probably some pending ABI
> update
> in fedora side waiting for the mass rebuilt to
, repo = f40-free
Package: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia, repo = f40-nonfree
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 12:37 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 09:46 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > As the m
dnf install telegram-desktop
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package qadwaitadecorations-qt6-0.1.3-
2.fc38.x86_64
- package qadwaitadecorations-qt6-0.1.3-2.fc38.x86_64 from @System
requires libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6.6)(64bit), but none of the providers can
be installed
- package
esktop.
>
> вс, 19 нояб. 2023 г., 16:32 Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
> :
> >
> > dnf install telegram-desktop
> >
> > Error:
> > Problem: problem with installed package qadwaitadecorations-qt6-
> > 0.1.3-
> > 2.fc38.x86_64
>
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 08:22 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> I don't think you can revert to such an older version that way and
> still assume spotify to still work.
> Better not to support el8 for spotify, unless you can get a copr
> repository with the needed deps.
>
It works, I tested first .
I lost all recent mail about this subject and also
https://lists.rpmfusion.org/archives/list/rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org/2024/1/
F40 Mass rebuild in RPM Fusion original message is from 2024-01-25
https://www.mail-archive.com/rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org/msg27581.html
I
I fixed gtetrinet with "Disable type safety check" on gcc compile flags
%global build_type_safety_c 0
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/gtetrinet.git/commit/?id=eb2f6d625e028beb9a1d782189e7cd5d184a5c9e
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html (this link is updated
manually be me
missing in Fedora and CMake wants
> to
> download them during RPM build.
> - In Fedora 41+, EmptyEpsilon actives experimental code of GLM-1.0.1;
> so, we need to bundle GLM-0.9.9.8
> - EmptyEpsilon looks running fine in Fedora 39 x86_64
>
> Do you want to try it before commit
And in F40 ? compat-ffmpeg5 will be dropped also ?
On Sat, 2024-03-23 at 13:00 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:
> commit b9f004a649292480fd6649f0123ca275b4cad6f1
> Author: Leigh Scott
> Date: Sat Mar 23 12:00:56 2024 +
>
> No longer needed
>
> .gitignore | 2 -
>
I happily announce that RPM Fusion Fedora 40 is General Available (GA).
Thank you all that make it happen .
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sat, 2024-01-06 at 05:31 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> smplayer is moving to Fedora
>
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256940
Hi,
smplayer was build for Fedora 39+, F38 is almost EOL so it was skipped.
and also built smplayer for EPEL 9. Fedora EPEL 8 and 7 don't have
52 matches
Mail list logo
