See the review request:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Note that I'm leaning towards just making a chromium-freeworld instead of
this package. Please see the request and leave your feedback there.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Newton wrote:
> I want to do this, bu
I want to do this, but I've been swamped at work recently. If someone beats
me to it, feel free.
I believe it's as simple as enabling "freeworld" and exclude all the other
files (as they would be duplicated from Fedora). I'll look into it tonight,
and if I get a working solution, i'll make a revie
Well I'm not skilled enough but I'm surprised that nobody in RPMFusion
is interested since it looks to be relatively simple.
> 2016-11-12 13:44 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Nouhaud :
> Hello,
>
> According to Tom 'spot' Callaway it's possible to build a
> chromium-libs-media-freeworld package to make availabl
2016-11-12 13:44 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Nouhaud :
> Hello,
>
> According to Tom 'spot' Callaway it's possible to build a
> chromium-libs-media-freeworld package to make available proprietary codecs
> to chromium. It will be great if that can be add to RPMFusion !
Feel free to maintain the work in RPM Fus
Hello,
According to Tom 'spot' Callaway it's possible to build a chromium-
libs-media-freeworld package to make available proprietary codecs to
chromium. It will be great if that can be add to RPMFusion !
https://www.reddit.com/r/Fedora/comments/5buozn/how_to_enable_mse_h264_
in_chromium/
https:
Hello,
Any progress on the codec handling of Chromium ?
Thanks !
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> libffmpeg.so is not provided anymore in the approved fedora build.
> So I think there is nothing much to replace, but instead to provide
> the shared library as a complement.
If it's not build as a shared library, then it's statically linked and
cannot be replaced at all
2016-08-07 1:18 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler :
> Jeremy Nouhaud wrote:
>> According to this comment from Spot it is possible to make, I quote,
>> "an rpmfusion addon package to replace the ffmpegsumo.so".
>
> And that comment is incorrect (or at least poorly formulated and
> incomplete):
> 1. There is no
I don't know why he say that if it's not really possible. Maybe you can
talk with him to have some clarifications ?
Jeremy Nouhaud wrote:
> According to this comment from Spot it is possible to make, I quote,
> "an rpmfusion addon package to replace the ffmpegsumo.so".
And that comment is incorrect (or at least poorly formulated and
incomplete):
1. There is no "ffmpegsumo.so" in his package (nor in any other c
According to this comment from Spot it is possible to make, I quote,
"an rpmfusion addon package to replace the ffmpegsumo.so".
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/chromium-52.0.2743.82-2.fc24#co
mment-464045
11 matches
Mail list logo
