Imho, it's rather the contrary: Since new nodes are added only very
rarely, the overhead of adding new nodes is rather irrelevant and, thus,
it's not sensible to _not_ fix that bug.
OK.. I agree with this.
Anyway, this should be easy to fix. See the patch, I'll send in a
minute. Beware,
Today kevin brintnall wrote:
Anyway, this should be easy to fix. See the patch, I'll send in a
minute. Beware, though, that I do not have a RRDCacheD setup, so the
patch is mostly untested - it compiles though ;-)
Your patch doesn't address the problem. I will email another shortly.
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 07:01:38AM -0500, kevin brintnall wrote:
Anyway, this should be easy to fix. See the patch, I'll send in a
minute. Beware, though, that I do not have a RRDCacheD setup, so the
patch is mostly untested - it compiles though ;-)
Your patch doesn't
