Today Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
|
| Jake Brutlag wrote:
|
| Tobi wrote:
| so if we can find a format for rrd which is better to accomodate
| future changes, I think it would be worth while doing the changes
| now, and find a way to keep on reading old rrd files instead of
|
so if we can find a format for rrd which is better to accomodate
future changes, I think it would be worth while doing the changes
now, and find a way to keep on reading old rrd files instead of
adding more hacks and going to a better ormat later having evben
more difficulty supporting old
This sounds like a great idea to me. I bet we could regain that lost
efficiency (and more) by using mmap(2) instead of stdio for the actual
access to the RRD data.
Tobi and I also discussed creating a native and portable (xml?) data
format for RRD data files. I think this is a good idea, but
Monday Jake Brutlag wrote:
| Obviously there are some problems that changing the format could resolve,
| but I didn't want to be the one to propose it. In a past life (okay, just 5
| years ago), I was working in tech support for a small database company and
| there I learned that backwards
