Re: [rrg] Reminder
No Toni. Those two ideas are neither "the" nor "premise" for the work of the RRG. They are ideas that we are looking at that, in some peoples judgment, for some architectural directions, are likely to be helpful. Joel Toni Stoev wrote: Dear fellow (re)searchers, I like to remind you of the following: Naming node, not interface, with locator and separating inter-domain from intra-domain routing are both together the premises for reaching the design goal of significantly improved routing scalability. Toni ___ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg ___ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
Re: [rrg] Reminder
Hi folks, Remember this? I¹ve seen one submission. Are folks working on things? Tony Hi all, We've had a bit of a schedule slip. We are still trying to hit a final document date of Mar. 8. That gives us just less than 7 weeks. The next deadline for a rebuttal is Feb. 9. The deadline for counterpoints will then be Mar. 2. This will give us a few days for final document prep. The word count limit for the rebuttal is 500 words. Regards, Tony ___ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
Re: [rrg] Reminder
Hi Tony. I will write a "rebuttal" for Ivip, but at present I am working on critiques for proposals which don't yet have one. I hope to post a preliminary GLI-Split discussion and critique today. - Robin > Hi folks, > > Remember this? I’ve seen one submission. Are folks working on things? > > Tony > > > Hi all, > > We've had a bit of a schedule slip. We are still trying to hit a final > document date of Mar. 8. That gives us just less than 7 weeks. The next > deadline for a rebuttal is Feb. 9. The deadline for counterpoints will > then be Mar. 2. This will give us a few days for final document prep. > > The word count limit for the rebuttal is 500 words. > > Regards, > Tony ___ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
