An issue I've run into is with a controller using the active_scaffold
plugin, which injects a method that modifies the search path for
partial files. When I try to run a spec on a a_s partial it reports
the file cannot be found.
I think this is the a_s code that does it but I'm not sure
I've tried running Heckle with rspec on some of my classes, but keep
getting (what I believe to be) an infinite recursion. Is there some
way to supply extra options to heckle via. rspec?
Scott
___
rspec-users mailing list
Hi,
How are people specifying models which act_as_list?
I'm thinking that it would be possible to check that acts_as_list
instance methods have been added to a class using something like this:
describe Page, acts_as_list do
it should act as a list do
Page.ancestors.should
On 8/15/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried running Heckle with rspec on some of my classes, but keep
getting (what I believe to be) an infinite recursion. Is there some
way to supply extra options to heckle via. rspec?
Currently not. What options do you want to supply?
On Aug 15, 2007, at 7:57 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On 8/15/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried running Heckle with rspec on some of my classes, but keep
getting (what I believe to be) an infinite recursion. Is there some
way to supply extra options to heckle via. rspec?
On Aug 15, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Scott Taylor wrote:
On Aug 15, 2007, at 7:57 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On 8/15/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried running Heckle with rspec on some of my classes, but keep
getting (what I believe to be) an infinite recursion. Is there some
On 8/15/07, Courtenay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/15/07, Priit Tamboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
describe ApplicationController do
it method login_required should redirect to home path without login do
heh. it is so out of place here :)
I agree. The goal is to describe behaviours of
On 8/15/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/15/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/07, Zach Dennis
