Re: [rspec-users] Mocks? Really?

2007-12-14 Thread Pat Maddox
On Dec 8, 2007 4:06 AM, Dan North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I prefer the mantra "mock roles, not objects", in other words, mock things > that have behaviour (services, components, resources, whatever your > preferred term is) rather than stubbing out domain objects themselves. If > you have to m

[rspec-users] RSpec poll

2007-12-14 Thread pat eyler
If anyone's interested in voting, I'm in the last couple of days of a poll about RSpec. If you'd like to toss in your vote (or a comment), I'd appreciate it: http://on-ruby.blogspot.com/2007/12/ruby-dev-tools-survey-results.html -- thanks, -pate - Duty makes us do

Re: [rspec-users] new home for the rspec website

2007-12-14 Thread Rick DeNatale
On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 9:12 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We've moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > > > http://rspec.org, of co

Re: [rspec-users] new home for the rspec website

2007-12-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On Dec 14, 2007 9:28 AM, Bart Zonneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 14 dec 2007, at 16:05, David Chelimsky wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The 1.1.0 docs are there. The 1.0.8 docs are still at > > http://rspec.rubyforge.org for the time being. We'll be archiving them > > at the new site soon. >

Re: [rspec-users] new home for the rspec website

2007-12-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On Dec 14, 2007 9:55 AM, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2007, at 10:05 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We've moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > > to respond to my e

Re: [rspec-users] new home for the rspec website

2007-12-14 Thread Scott Taylor
On Dec 14, 2007, at 10:05 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > Hi all, > > We've moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > to respond to my email :( > So now will you update the site more frequently than before? I re

Re: [rspec-users] new home for the rspec website

2007-12-14 Thread Bart Zonneveld
On 14 dec 2007, at 16:05, David Chelimsky wrote: > Hi all, > > The 1.1.0 docs are there. The 1.0.8 docs are still at > http://rspec.rubyforge.org for the time being. We'll be archiving them > at the new site soon. Sweet! Any idea when the docs for the plain text Stories are online? I'm strugglin

Re: [rspec-users] new home for the rspec website

2007-12-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On Dec 14, 2007 9:12 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We've moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > > to respond to my e

Re: [rspec-users] new home for the rspec website

2007-12-14 Thread Cody P. Skidmore
David Chelimsky wrote: > We've moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > to respond to my email :( Squatters make getting a decent domain name nearly impossible these days. When searching for a .com, I'm almost e

Re: [rspec-users] new home for the rspec website

2007-12-14 Thread Rick DeNatale
On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We've moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > to respond to my email :( > > The 1.1.0 docs are there. Cool. You might want to change the upg

[rspec-users] new home for the rspec website

2007-12-14 Thread David Chelimsky
Hi all, We've moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet to respond to my email :( The 1.1.0 docs are there. The 1.0.8 docs are still at http://rspec.rubyforge.org for the time being. We'll be archiving them at the ne

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] RSpec-1.1.0 is released

2007-12-14 Thread Rick DeNatale
On 12/14/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote: > > shadowfax:~/ssanta/vendor/plugins/rspec rick$ svn switch > > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/rspec > > svn: Connection closed unexpectedly > > > > k$ svn switch http://rspec.rubyforg

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] RSpec-1.1.0 is released

2007-12-14 Thread Scott Taylor
On Dec 14, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote: > On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I'd switch this to http: >> >> Trunk: >> http://rspec.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/rspec >> http://rspec.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/rspec_on_rails > > H > > shadowfax:~/ssanta/vendor/pl

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] RSpec-1.1.0 is released

2007-12-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On Dec 14, 2007 7:29 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'd switch this to http: > > > > Trunk: > > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/rspec > > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/rspec_on_rails > > H > > shadowfa

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] RSpec-1.1.0 is released

2007-12-14 Thread Rick DeNatale
On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd switch this to http: > > Trunk: > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/rspec > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/rspec_on_rails H shadowfax:~/ssanta/vendor/plugins/rspec rick$ svn switch http://rspec.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/r

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] RSpec-1.1.0 is released

2007-12-14 Thread Rick DeNatale
On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 7:18 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another question. > > > > Will http://rspec.rubyforge.org/ be updated or is there already an > > official source for updated docs? > > We've had numerous permissions probl

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] RSpec-1.1.0 is released

2007-12-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On Dec 14, 2007 7:15 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The RSpec Development Team is pleased as glug (that's kind of like > > punch, but more festive) to announce RSpec-1.1.0. > > Now I'm hoping that for those of us who have t

[rspec-users] Vim integration.

2007-12-14 Thread Erik Terpstra
Hi, Does anybody have a vim script that enables me to run specs from within vim and have the cursor positioned on the right line in case of a backtrace? TIA, Erik. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/l

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] RSpec-1.1.0 is released

2007-12-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On Dec 14, 2007 7:18 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another question. > > Will http://rspec.rubyforge.org/ be updated or is there already an > official source for updated docs? We've had numerous permissions problems uploading the new docs over the last couple of years. It's been a

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] RSpec-1.1.0 is released

2007-12-14 Thread Rick DeNatale
Another question. Will http://rspec.rubyforge.org/ be updated or is there already an official source for updated docs? -- Rick DeNatale My blog on Ruby http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://r

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] RSpec-1.1.0 is released

2007-12-14 Thread Rick DeNatale
On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The RSpec Development Team is pleased as glug (that's kind of like > punch, but more festive) to announce RSpec-1.1.0. Now I'm hoping that for those of us who have the two rspec plugins installed as svn externals in a Rails 2.0.1 project th

Re: [rspec-users] Problem running examples with spec_server

2007-12-14 Thread David Nolan
OK I am studip. The reason "spec -X" does not output anything is because it does not specify a directory with any examples in it. "spec ./spec -X" works as expected. Cheers, Dave On 13/12/2007, David Nolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > It doesn't output any error messages. It doesn't out

Re: [rspec-users] RSpec book

2007-12-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On Dec 14, 2007 2:35 AM, Tom Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14 Dec 2007, at 06:36, Chris Olsen wrote: > > BTW. Has anyone heard if the pragmatic rspec book is still planned to > > be released this month? > > I second this -- O'Reilly owe me a book for the November hackfest and > I'm wonder

Re: [rspec-users] RSpec book

2007-12-14 Thread Tom Stuart
On 14 Dec 2007, at 06:36, Chris Olsen wrote: > BTW. Has anyone heard if the pragmatic rspec book is still planned to > be released this month? I second this -- O'Reilly owe me a book for the November hackfest and I'm wondering whether I should ask for a rain check until the RSpec tome arrives