On Dec 29, 2007 1:29 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 28, 2007 11:00 PM, Andrew WC Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was looking over some of my specs.
> > I was thinking that the following:
> >
> > @game.should_receive(:name).and_return('The Battle for Blaze')
> > @game.sh
On Dec 29, 2007 5:46 PM, Francis Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if anyone else will find this thought useful, but:
>
>
> I think different programmers have different situations, and they
> often force different sorts of priorities. I feel like a lot of the
> talk about mocking -- p
I wrote the following in my spec:
emails = ActionMailer::Base.deliveries
emails.length.should eql(2)
response.should send_email {
with_tag('tr', @contact_info[:full_name])
}
knowing that 1) an email is being sent; and 2) the contact info is in
a 'p' tag and only in a
I don't know if anyone else will find this thought useful, but:
I think different programmers have different situations, and they
often force different sorts of priorities. I feel like a lot of the
talk about mocking -- particularly as it hedges into discussions of
modeling, design as part o
Hi all - I've been keeping an eye on this thread and I've just been
too busy with holiday travel and book writing to participate as I
would like.
I'm just going to lay out some thoughts in one fell swoop rather than
going back through and finding all the quotes. Hope that works for
you.
First - "
El sáb, 29 de dic de 2007, a las 02:00:25 -0500, Andrew WC Brown dijo:
> I was looking over some of my specs.
> I was thinking that the following:
>
> @game.should_receive(:name).and_return('The Battle for Blaze')
> @game.should_receive(:people).and_return(500)
> @game.should_receive(:activate
On Dec 29, 2007 6:00 PM, Andrew WC Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just see these large blocks of:
>
> @shopping_list.should_receive(:milk)..and_return('milk')
> @shopping_list.should_receive(:bagel).and_return('bagel')
> @shopping_list.should_receive(:coffee).and_return('coffee')
>
> and it
eg.
I'm going to the store to buy one milk
I'm going to the store to buy one bagel
I'm going to the store to buy one coffee
@shopping_list.should_receive(:milk).once.and_return('milk')
@shopping_list.should_receive(:bagel).once.and_return('bagel')
@shopping_list.should_receive(:coffee).once.and_re
On Dec 28, 2007 11:00 PM, Andrew WC Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking over some of my specs.
> I was thinking that the following:
>
> @game.should_receive(:name).and_return('The Battle for Blaze')
> @game.should_receive(:people).and_return(500)
> @game.should_receive (:activated)
Below I've pasted a ./script/story command I've been using for about a
week. It has three modes of operation:
1. ./script/story with no arguments will run all *.story files in the story path
2. ./script/story with a path or glob will run the specified stories
3. If input is passed in via STDIN, it
On Dec 29, 2007 7:44 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2007 4:28 PM, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I had to patch RSpec in the below manner to get it running
> > on Ruby 1.9, but I doubt these fixes can be the culprit.
> >
> > --- lib/spec/runner
On Dec 27, 2007 4:28 PM, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I happily hand-compiled Ruby 1.9.0-0 into /home/shot/opt/ruby today
> and I'm running into a strange error with RSpec – all my examples work
> perfectly with Ruby 1.8 but are considered peding on Ruby 1.9.
> Pe
On Dec 28, 2007 11:56 PM, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm moving an older project to Rails 2.0.2 and ran into a roadblock on
> the version matching. Here's script/console session:
>
> >> Spec::VERSION::REV
> => "1785"
> >> Spec::Rails::VERSION::REV
> NoMethodError: undefined method `run='
I was looking over some of my specs.
I was thinking that the following:
@game.should_receive(:name).and_return('The Battle for Blaze')
@game.should_receive(:people).and_return(500)
@game.should_receive(:activated).and_return(true)
Would it look cleaner if I could do this instead?
@game.shoul
14 matches
Mail list logo
